Abstract
Accessibility models are important tools in evaluating economic potential and estimating inter-city transport connections. However, existing models are mostly based on infrastructure networks, where the actual arrangement of time -tables, road condition etc. are not considered. Internet booking platforms and online digital maps now provide detailed train and flight time -tables and accurate road trip recommendations, which can be synthesized into travel routes that are very close to predicting what occurs in reality. On this basis we propose a new structure of accessibility model, where the accessibility between cities are represented as the accumulation of all feasible travel routes, and the travel routes are weighted by their actual time and financial cost. By validating the model with economic data and actual traffic volume acquired through location-based services data, the model proves more effective than traditional accessibility model and network indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alperovich G (1984) The size distribution of cities: on the empirical validity of the rank-size rule. J Urban Econ 16(2):0–239
Bonacich P, Lloyd P (2001) Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Soc Netw 23(3):191–201
Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27(1):55–71
Eluru N, Chakour V, El-Geneidy AM (2012) Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: insights from McGill University members commute patterns. Publ Transp 4(2):129–149
Ettema D, Ashiru O, Polak JW (2004) Modelling timing and duration of activities and trips in response to pricing policies. Percept Mot Skills 96(1):1013–1014
Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks’ conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239
Gabaix X (1999) Zipf’s law and the growth of cities. Am Econ Rev 89(2):129–132
Jin F, Wang C, Li X (2010) China’s regional transport dominance: density, proximity, and accessibility. J Geogr Sci. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11442-010-0295-6
Katz L (1953) A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18(1):39–43
Mackenzie KD (1966) Structural centrality in communications networks. Psychometrika 31(1):17–25
Ma J, Fan ZP, Huang LH (1999) A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur J Oper Res 112(2):397–404
Marchiori M, Latora V (2000) Harmony in the small-world. Phys A 285(3):539–546
Rich DC (1978) Population potential, potential transportation cost and industrial location. Area 10(3):222–226
Sabidussi G (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31(4):581–603
Smith KV, Phillips CT, Lewis RJ (1970) Network evaluation of complex transportation systems. Transp Res 6(1):103–111
Straatemeier T (2008) How to plan for regional accessibility? Transp Policy 15(2):0–137
Zhang L, Lu Y (2007) Regional accessibility of land traffic network in the Yangtze river delta. J Geog Sci 17(3):351–364
Zhao K, Zhao H (2011) Integration of coal min resources and its influence on the economic development of Shanxi Province. Coal Econ Res 11:17–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fan, Y., Zhan, Q., Zhang, H., Wu, J. (2019). A Comprehensive Regional Accessibility Model Based on Actual Routes-of-Travel: A Proposal with Multiple Online Data. In: Geertman, S., Zhan, Q., Allan, A., Pettit, C. (eds) Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities. CUPUM 2019. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19424-6_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19423-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19424-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)