Abstract
Iris Murdoch’s interpreters have often tried to read her as putting forward an alternative form of ethical foundationalism. On this reading, Murdoch is taken to be proposing ‘loving attention’ or ‘the Good’ as a fundamental moral principle that would play the same unifying role as the principle of utility or the categorical imperative. Here, I argue that a careful reading of chapter 17 of Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals shows that the foundationalist reading is untenable. Murdoch, I suggest, is better understood as a methodological descriptivist. She is not simply offering us an alternative moral theory, but a radically different approach to the business of moral philosophy itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antonaccio, M. 2000. Picturing the human: The moral thought of Iris Murdoch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arendt, H. 2006. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin Classics.
Banicki, K. 2017. Iris Murdoch and the varieties of virtue ethics. In Varieties of virtue ethics, ed. David Carr, James Arthur, and Kristján Kristjánsson, 89–104. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brewer, T. 2011. The retrieval of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, B. 2012. Iris Murdoch and the prospects for critical moral perception. In Iris Murdoch, philosopher, ed. Justin Broackes, 227–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Denham, A.E. 2001. Envisioning the Good: Iris Murdoch’s moral psychology. Modern Fiction Studies 47 (3): 602–629.
Driver, J. 2012. ‘For every foot its own shoe’: Method and moral theory in the philosophy of Iris Murdoch. In Iris Murdoch, philosopher, ed. Justin Broackes, 275–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hämäläinen, N. 2016. Descriptive ethics: What does moral philosophy know about morality? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hämäläinen, N. 2018. Iris Murdoch and the descriptive aspect of moral philosophy. Iris Murdoch Review 9: 23–30.
Hopwood, M. 2017. Murdoch, moral concepts, and the universalizability of moral reasons. Philosophical Papers 46 (2): 245–271.
Hopwood, M. 2018. ‘The extremely difficult realization that something other than oneself is real’: Iris Murdoch on love and moral agency. European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1): 477–501.
Jay, Martin. 1993. Force fields: Between intellectual history and cultural critique. New York: Routledge.
McDowell, J. 1979. Virtue and reason. The Monist 62 (3): 331–350.
McDowell, J. 1995. Eudaimonism and realism in Aristotle’s Ethics. In Aristotle and moral realism, ed. Robert Heinaman, 201–218. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Millgram, E. 2004. Kantian crystallization. Ethics 114 (3): 511–513.
Millgram, E. 2005. Murdoch, practical reasoning, and particularism. In Ethics done right: Practical reasoning as a foundation for moral theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murdoch, I. 1993. Metaphysics as a guide to morals (Abbreviated MGM). New York: Viking.
Murdoch, I. 1999. Existentialists and mystics: Writings on philosophy and literature. New York: Penguin Books.
Nussbaum, M. 1999. Virtue ethics: A misleading category? Journal of Ethics 3 (3): 163–201.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Why practice needs ethical theory: Particularism, principle, and bad behavior. In Moral particularism, ed. Brad Hooker and Margaret Olivia Little, 227–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robjant, D. 2011. As a Buddhist Christian: The misappropriation of Iris Murdoch. Heythrop Journal 52 (6): 993–1008.
Velleman, J.D. 1999. Love as a moral emotion. Ethics 109 (2): 338–374.
Zagzebski, L. 2017. Exemplarist moral theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hopwood, M. (2019). Fields of Force: Murdoch on Axioms, Duties, and Eros (MGM Chapter 17). In: Hämäläinen, N., Dooley, G. (eds) Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18966-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18967-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)