Skip to main content

What Is a Biological Individual?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Old Questions and Young Approaches to Animal Evolution

Part of the book series: Fascinating Life Sciences ((FLS))

Abstract

This paper addresses the concept of individual and its role in biological theory and practice. The ability to identify individuals, paradigmatically organisms, is central not only to address them as coherent units of variation or selection. The criteria chosen to define individuality directly affect which entities we consider worth investigating, which kind of methods and models we chose, which properties (like agency) these units possibly can have, and what kind of questions we ask about them. In this paper, first, the history of the concept of biological individuality as well as underlying criteria such as indivisibility are described. Second, it is shown that in the light of rapid developments in high-throughput technologies and novel organism-centered views of evolution in the so-called extended evolutionary synthesis (including evo-devo, epigenetics, and niche construction theory), answering the old question what a biological individual is becomes more important than ever before. This is the case as it turns out to be increasingly difficult to identify individuals, as organisms come to be understood as deeply embedded in their environment. Sometimes, they are even part of other organisms (in holobionts). The answers given to these challenges have not only theoretical and methodological consequences, such as for choosing model organisms, but also affect human life in a number of ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At least since this time, the two concepts of individual and organism were often used interchangeable.

  2. 2.

    Scaffolding describes hybrids between organisms and a living or nonliving scaffold for the use of reproduction or development. These scaffold resources are not used for fueling metabolism. Examples of scaffolds are nonliving byproducts, or leftover, of metabolism such as wood in trees (a leftover of previous living cells allowing the development of the surviving living tissues) or organisms of the same species (e.g., in viviparous animals, mothers temporarily scaffolding the development of the offspring) or different species (e.g., in symbionts and hosts of parasites).

References

  • Andersen EC, Gerke JP, Shapiro JA, Crissman JR, Ghosh R, Bloom JS, Félix M-A, Kruglyak L (2012) Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nat Genet 44(3):285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baedke J (2018) O organism, where art thou? Old and new challenges for organism-centered biology. J Hist Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9549-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boniolo G, Testa G (2012) The identity of living beings, epigenetics, and the modesty of philosophy. Erkenntnis 76(2):279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard F, Huneman P (eds) (2013) From groups to individuals: perspectives on biological associations and emerging individuality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu L, Gilbert SF (2015) The birth of the holobiont: multi-species birthing through mutual scaffolding and niche construction. Biosemiotics 8(2):191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke E (2011) The problem of biological individuality. Biol Theory 5(4):312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1987) Notebooks 1836–44. In: Barrett PH, Gautrey Peter J, Herbert S, Kohn D, Smith S (eds) Physical anthropology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • DiFrisco J (2018) Kinds of biological individuals: sortals, projectibility, and selection. Br J Philos Sci 1:axy006. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy006

  • Dupré J, Guttinger S (2016) Viruses as living processes. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 59:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwick J (2017) Distrust that particular intuition: resilient essentialisms and empirical challenges in the history of biological individuality. In: Lidgard S, Nyhart LK (eds) Biological individuality: integrating scientific, philosophical, and historical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 277–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund J, Brandmaier AM, Lewejohann L, Kirste I, Kritzler M, Krüger A, Sachser N, Lindenberger U, Kempermann G (2013) Emergence of individuality in genetically identical mice. Science 340(6133):756–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1968) In: Tallmadge May M (ed) On the usefulness of the parts of the body. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF (2014) A holobiont birth narrative: the epigenetic transmission of the human microbiome. Front Genet 5:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF (2017) Biological individuality: a relational reading. In: Lidgard S, Nyhart LK (eds) Biological individuality: integrating scientific, philosophical, and historical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 297–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Sapp J, Tauber AI (2012) A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals. Q Rev Biol 87(4):325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gissis S, Jablonka E (2011) Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer JR (2014a) Reproduction and scaffolded developmental processes: an integrated evolutionary perspective. In: Minelli A, Pradeu T (eds) Towards a theory of development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 183–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer JR (2014b) Reproduction and the scaffolded development of hybrids. In: Caporael LR, Griesemer JR, Wimsatt WC (eds) Developing scaffolding in evolution, cognition and culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 23–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel E (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, vol 2. G. Reimer, Orchard Lake, MI

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herron MD, Rashidi A, Shelton DE, Driscoll WW (2013) Cellular differentiation and individuality in the ‘minor’ multicellular taxa. Biol Rev 88:844–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig O (1893–98/1909) Allgemeine biologie. G. Fischer, Schaffhausen

    Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2010) Assessing the prospects for a return of organisms in evolutionary biology. Hist Philos Life Sci 32(2–3):341–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2014a) Individuality as a theoretical scheme. I. Formal and material concepts of individuality. Biol Theory 9(4):361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2014b) Individuality as a theoretical scheme. II. About the weak individuality of organisms and ecosystems. Biol Theory 9(4):374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1852) Upon animal individuality. Proc R Inst 1:184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarsky M, Camunas-Soler J, Kertesz M, De Vlaminck I, Koh W, Pan W, Martin L et al (2017) Numerous uncharacterized and highly divergent microbes which colonize humans are revealed by circulating cell-free DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(36):9623–9628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Nat News 514(7521):161–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc B 282(1813):20151019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Matthews B, Feldman MW (2016) An introduction to niche construction theory. Evol Ecol 30:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhoff SG, Lenhoff HM, Trembley A (1986) Hydra and the birth of experimental biology, 1744: Abraham Trembley’s mémoires concerning the polyps. The Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidgard S, Nyhart LK (2017) The work of biological individuality: concepts and contexts. In: Lidgard S, Nyhart LK (eds) Biological individuality: integrating scientific, philosophical, and historical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 17–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd VK, Brisson JA, Fitzpatrick KA, McEachern LA, Verhulst EC (2012) The epigenetics of emerging and nonmodel organisms. Genet Res Int 2012:491204. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/491204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Minelli A, Baedke J (2014) Model organisms in evo-devo: promises and pitfalls of the comparative approach. Hist Philos Life Sci 36(1):42–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minelli A, Fusco G (eds) (2008) Evolving pathways: key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossio M, Saborido C, Moreno A (2009) An organizational account of biological functions. Br J Philos Sci 60(4):813–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson DJ (2014) The return of the organism as a fundamental explanatory concept in biology. Philos Compass 9(5):347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper JW, Herron MD (2008) Does biology need an organism concept? Biol Rev 84(3):627–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EL (2016) The life organic: the theoretical biology club and the roots of epigenetics. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Müller GB (eds) (2010) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradeu T (2010) What is an organism? An immunological answer. Hist Philos Life Sci 32:247–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pradeu T (2016a) Organisms or biological individuals? Combining physiological and evolutionary individuality. Biol Philos 31(6):797–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradeu T (2016b) The many faces of biological individuality. Biol Philos 31(6):761–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T et al (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464(7285):59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter WE (1919) The unity of the organism, or, the organismal conception of life, vol 2. Gorham Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell ES (1930) The interpretation of development and heredity: a study in biological method. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze J, Schierenberg E (2011) Evolution of embryonic development in nematodes. EvoDevo 2(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-2-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skillings D (2016) Holobionts and the ecology of organisms: multi-species communities or integrated individuals? Biol Philos 31(6):875–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H (1864–67) The principles of biology. vol 2, Williams and Norgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner B (2015) Pathways to pluralism about biological individuality. Biol Philos 30(5):609–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (2000) The extended organism: the physiology of animal built structures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS (2016) Homeostasis and the physiological dimension of niche construction theory in ecology and evolution. Evol Ecol 30(2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner MR, Uller T (2015) Epigenetic determinism in science and society. N Genet Soc 34(2):177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP, Laubichler MD (2000) Character identification in evolutionary biology: the role of the organism. Theory Biosci 119(1):20–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh DM (2015) Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wray GA, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ, Lenski RE, Mackay TFC, Schluter D, Strassmann JE (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? No, all is well. Nat News 514(7521):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Baedke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baedke, J. (2019). What Is a Biological Individual?. In: Martín-Durán, J., Vellutini, B. (eds) Old Questions and Young Approaches to Animal Evolution. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18202-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics