Abstract
Research students on a doctoral journey can sometimes feel like Little Red Riding Hood, observing those on the ethics committee as having shiny teeth and sharp claws, as they offer up their basket containing their research project. Understandably, students can find the idea of these additional gatekeepers with varying opinions and the power to axe their research plans an insurmountable difficulty. Suppose, however, the research student is faced with a participant who talks in an interview about something sensitive and way off topic, then cries? This is the real wolf to be avoided. If the researcher has considered these possibilities, it will be easier to deal with and pre-empt other needs, such as tissues. Guillemin and Gillam (“Reflexivity, and ethically important moments in research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280, 2004) term this “practical ethics”. If this is how ethics is approached, the ethics committee can be appreciated as a gateway on the journey to ensure that researchers have pre-thought possible hurdles, because when things happen unexpectedly, there may be little time to consider a reaction. This chapter outlines how research students will benefit from learning how to approach their research in an ethical manner.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Batty, R. 2017. Never Alone. https://lukebattyfoundation.org.au.
Ellis, C., T. Adams, and A. P. Bochner. 2011. “Auto ethnography: An overview.” Forum Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589.
Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. 2004. “Reflexivity, and ethically important moments in research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280.
Mann, S. 2016. The Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Process. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milgram, S. 1963. “Behavioral study of obedience.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (4): 371–378.
Novotney, A. 2013. “The therapist effect.” American Psychological Association 44 (2): 48.
Sanjari, M., F. Bahramnezhad, F. K. Fomani, M. Shoghi, and M. A. Cheraghi. 2014. “Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: The necessity to develop a specific guideline.” Journal of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine 7 (14). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263394.
Thomas, G. 2009. How to Do Your Research Project. London: SAGE.
Varela, F. 1999. Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom, and Cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Yousafzai, M. 2013. I Am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and Was Shot by the Taliban. New York: Little, Brown & Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newport, J. (2019). Approaching Research in a Prepared, Mindful and Ethical Manner. In: Brien, D.L., Batty, C., Ellison, E., Owens, A. (eds) The Doctoral Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18199-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18198-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18199-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)