Skip to main content

Forecasting Post-Crisis Virginia Tax Revenue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Government Budget Forecasting

Abstract

This chapter addresses the question of whether states can improve the accuracy of revenue forecasts by using more advanced time series and Bayesian vector autoregression (BVAR) forecasting methods. Using state revenue data from Virginia, we first estimate baseline forecasts using autoregression (AR) and vector autoregression (VAR). We present the theoretical case for estimating a BVAR model, and then we present and compare forecasts based on the AR, VAR, and BVAR. Although there are gains in forecast accuracy in using the BVAR, the BVAR is not a panacea for forecasting the extremely volatile corporate income tax revenue series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Virginia is one of Governing Magazine’s “Best managed” states, winning awards from professional organizations for the high quality of its financial reporting and maintaining AAA bond rating for two decades (Conant 2010).

  2. 2.

    For a discussion of the budget preparation process, see Virginia Department of Planning and Budget (2014) and Virginia Senate Committee Staff (2006).

  3. 3.

    Although there are forecasts from the government of Virginia, we do not analyze and compare them with our model-based forecasts as the data we use are based on different definitions of the various revenue streams.

  4. 4.

    Please also see Stock and Watson (2001) for a primer on VAR modeling and Robertson and Tallman (1999) for an overview of VAR forecasting.

  5. 5.

    Krol uses real defense spending, real crude oil prices, real U.S. personal income, consumer price index, real California housing prices, and real California personal income. We use total vehicle sales, production of defense and space equipment, retail gasoline price, Virginia housing price index, Virginia personal income, and Virginia unemployment rate.

  6. 6.

    The data are available from a historical perspective rather than available in real time. This distinction can be extremely important empirically and can alter the rankings of forecast models.

  7. 7.

    This section draws from Baum (2013), Becketti (2013), Brandt and Williams (2007), Johnston and Dinardo (1997), Lütkepohl (2007), and Parker (2014).

  8. 8.

    Differencing is one of several ways to obtain stationarity. Notably, a cointegrating combination obtains, and the properties of levels forecasts can be improved by taking cointegration into account; see Engle and Yoo (1987). However, further research has shown mixed success when taking cointegration into account. Christoffersen and Diebold (1998) along with Hoffman and Rasche (1996) find mixed results while Shoesmith (1992) as well as Baghestani and McNown (1992) find improved forecasting accuracy. See also Elliott (2006) for further discussion.

  9. 9.

    See Lütkepohl (2007) and Brandt (2013) for a technical exposition of BVAR models.

  10. 10.

    Empirical results should be sensitive to the choice of model estimation period. Theoretically speaking, earlier years of the model estimation period are less relevant to explaining more recent revenues and hence reduces the accuracy of forecasts. With higher frequency data series, this assertion can be empirically verified. It is also the case that empirical results are sensitive to the choice of forecast period. Forecasts in distant future time periods are less accurate than the time periods closer to the end of the model estimation period.

  11. 11.

    In fact, publicly available revenue forecasts are made on an annual basis.

  12. 12.

    According to Elliott and Timmermann (2016), “although the BVAR forecasts generally perform well, no single approach appears to be dominant across variables and forecast horizons, illustrating the need to adopt different approaches to different situations and perhaps also consider forecast combinations.”

References

  • Baghestani, H., & McNown, R. (1992). Forecasting the federal budget with time-series models. Journal of Forecasting, 11(2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, C. F. (2013). VAR, SVAR, and VECM models: Lecture slides for EC 823. Department of Economics, Boston College (Spring). Retrieved from http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-C/S2013/823/EC823.S2013.nn10.slides.pdf.

  • Becketti, S. (2013). Introduction to time series analysis using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. J., & Dadayan, L. (2014). State tax revenue forecasting accuracy: Technical report. Retrieved from http://rockinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-09-30-Revenue_Forecasting_Accuracy.pdf.

  • Brandt, P. T. (2013). Bayesian VAR time series analysis. Lecture, ICPSR Summer Program Time Series Analysis: Advanced Topics Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI, July 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, P. T., & Williams, J. T. (2007). Multiple time series models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carriero, A., Clark, T. E., & Marcellino, M. (2015). Bayesian VARs: Specification choices and forecast accuracy. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(1), 46–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriero, A., Mumtaz, H., & Theophilopoulou, A. (2012). Forecasting fiscal variables using Bayesian VARs with constant and drifting coefficients. Unpublished (PDF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P. F., & Diebold, F. X. (1998). Cointegration and long-horizon forecasting. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16(4), 450–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. K. (2010). Budget deficits in the states: Virginia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(1), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. K., Bunch, B., Duncombe, W., Lauth, T. P., Robbins, M., Simonsen, B., et al. (2012). State budgeting in the aftermath of the great recession: A comparative perspective. Municipal Finance Journal, 33(2), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G. (2006). Forecasting with trending data. In G. Elliott, W. J. Granger, & A. Timmermann (Eds.), Handbook of economic forecasting (Vol. 1, pp. 555–604). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, G., & Timmermann, A. (2016). Economic forecasting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Yoo, B. S. (1987). Forecasting and testing in co-integrated systems. Journal of Econometrics, 35(1), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, M. P., & Knittel, M. J. (1997). Revenue forecasting in Michigan. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association (pp. 313–318). Washington, DC: National Tax Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D. F., & Hubrich, K. (2011). Combining disaggregate forecasts or combining disaggregate information to forecast an aggregate. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(2), 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Rasche, R. H. (1996). Assessing forecast performance in a cointegrated system. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(5), 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. (1997). Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, S. (2013). Forecasting with Bayesian vector autoregression. In G. Elliott & A. Timmermann (Eds.), Handbook of economic forecasting (Vol. 2B, 1st ed., pp. 791–897). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L., & Lütkepohl, H. (2017). Structural vector autoregressive analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krol, R. (2010). Forecasting state tax revenue: A Bayesian vector autoregression approach. Northridge: California State University. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~hcecn001/published/BVAR_Forecast.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl, H. (2007). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichol, E. C. (2014). Improving state revenue forecasting: Best practices for a more trusted and reliable revenue estimate. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities-CBPP, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/8-7-14sfp.pdf.

  • McShea, M. F. (2011). Forecasting Virginia state revenues: A vector autoregression approach. Unpublished (PDF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. A. (2014). Vector autoregression and vector error-correction models. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Reed College (Spring). Retrieved from http://academic.reed.edu/economics/parker/s14/312/tschapters/S13_Ch_5.pdf.

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. (2015). Managing volatile tax collections in state revenue forecasts. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2015/03/managing-volatile-tax-collections-in-state-revenue-forecasts.

  • Robertson, J. C., & Tallman, E. W. (1999). Vector autoregressions: Forecasting and reality. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 84(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoesmith, G. L. (1992). Co-integration, error correction and improved medium-term regional VAR forecasting. Journal of Forecasting, 11(2), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. A., & Zha, T. (1998). Bayesian methods for dynamic multivariate models. International Economic Review, 39(4), 949–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stata Corporation. (2013). Vector error correction models: Stata Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/manuals13/tsvec.pdf.

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. M. (1984). Improving economic forecasting with Bayesian vector autoregression. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Department of Planning and Budget. (2010). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://dpb.virginia.gov/budget/faq.cfm.

  • Virginia Department of Planning and Budget. (2014). Overview of Virginia’s economic and revenue forecasting. File attachment to e-mail correspondence from John Layman, Chief Economist for State of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Senate Committee Staff. (2006). Understanding Virginia’s budget process. Richmond. Retrieved from http://sfc.virginia.gov/pdf/understandingvirginiasbudgetprocess.ppt.

  • Yaffee, R. A. (2010). Forecast evaluation with Stata. Paper presented at the United Kingdom Stata Users Group Conference, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa McShea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McShea, M., Cordes, J. (2019). Forecasting Post-Crisis Virginia Tax Revenue. In: Williams, D., Calabrese, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Government Budget Forecasting. Palgrave Studies in Public Debt, Spending, and Revenue. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18195-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18194-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18195-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics