Skip to main content

Assessing the Effects of Different Urban Forms on Social Sustainability: The Case of Tehran

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban and Transit Planning

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

  • 1899 Accesses

Abstract

One of the main functions of cities is to facilitate the participation of citizens in urban life through the use of urban spaces. Many urban areas lack the acceptable conditions for most urban behaviors and in general urban sustainability and sociability around the world. The concept of sustainable neighborhoods is one of the key factors in developed cities toward achieving sustainable development. Sustainable neighborhoods are related to different physical and social factors of the neighborhoods, which should have been investigated carefully. Although sustainability’s three main aspects are economic, social, and environmental, we have sought to focus our attention on the social aspect and examine how it is affected by various typologies of urban form. This work analyzes the physical and social organizations in neighborhoods and proposes patterns of social aspects of sustainability. It is based on models in the city of Tehran, Iran. Three neighborhoods representing the wide diversity of social sustainability and urban from among 22 neighborhoods were selected. This selection was made based on a GIS analysis which provided a North-South corridor containing enough diversity to model the whole city. From this corridor, we selected these three neighborhoods based on the Delphi method and systematic sampling. Applying the Delphi method to our model, neighborhoods with similar characteristics were removed and using three were chosen to represent the diversity of organic, planned, and mixed neighborhoods. In order to ensure a comprehensive understanding of both social aspects of sustainability and urban form for each neighborhood, field studies and the data collected from our questionnaire were combined. Field studies relied primarily on the expertise of the urban planner, while the questionnaire involved asking the residents, workers as well as the visitors a set of pre-designed questions covering a range of social factors. Subsequently, factor analysis was used to analyze the data gathered from the three neighborhoods. A basic general model indicating the relationship between urban form and social aspect of sustainably was derived. The general model was run in the three typologies, resulting in three distinct models for each typology, each model included a unique relationship between urban form factors and factors affecting social aspects of sustainability. The insights of this article in the relationship between social aspect of sustainability and urban form can enable the planner, through a collaborative scheme with users, to increase social aspect of sustainability by modifying urban form factors in neighborhoods with different typologies in the city of Tehran. The same process conducted here can be applied in any other city in the world, although the models would be different depending on the area’s culture, context, and socioeconomic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. https://Www.Google.Com/Books?Hl=En&Lr=&Id=V8cvcgaaqbaj&Oi=Fnd&Pg=Pp9&Dq=Sustainable+Communities&Ots=Aajctxatxn&Sig=Degzpubn-Py_Whk8i7qjn2knkpm.

  • Åhman, H. (2013). Social aspect of sustainability—Society at the intersection of development and maintenance. Local Environment, 18, 1153–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S., & Andersson, K. (2013). Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio, 42, 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barretti, G. (1996). The transport dimension. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form (pp. 171–180). London: E & Fn Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social aspect of sustainability and urban form: Evidence from british cities. Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (1992). The contradictions of the compact city: A review. In Michael Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable Development and Urban Form (pp. 138–159). London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: Just or just compact a preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 37, 1969–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M., & Kirk, K. (1998). Sustainable by 2020? A strategic approach to urban regeneration for Britain’s cities. Policy: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, E., & Lee, G. (2008). Critical factors for improving social aspect of sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clercq, F., & Bertolini, L. (2003). Achieving sustainable accessibility: An evaluation of policy measures in the amsterdam area. Built Environment, 29(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conzen, M. (2001). The study of urban form in the United States. Urban Morphology, 5(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social aspect of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drakakis-Smith, D. (1995). Third world cities: Sustainable urban development, 1. Urban Studies, 32(4–5), 659–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, T., Mclaren, D., & Hillman, M. (1991). Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development. London: Friends Of The Earth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, T. (2010). Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folahan, A. A., Rukayat, A. B., & Kola Gbolagade, K. O. (2018). Urban sustainability concepts and their implications on urban form. Urban and Regional Planning, 3(1), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieller, E., Littig, B. (2004). Soziale Nachhaltigkeit; Arbeiterkammer Wien, Ed.; Informationen Zur Mweltpolitik 160:Wien, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. (2006). Sustainable urban forms their typologies, models and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In Dobson A (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M. (2000). The acceptability of urban intensification. In K. Williams, E. Burton, & M. Jenks (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form. London: E & Fn Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2005). Future forms and design for sustainable cities. Oxford: Architectural.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2007). Defi Ning the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research. Town Planning Review, 78, 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. (2005). Territorial justice and devolution. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2009). Space: social product and use value. In N. Brenner & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, state, world: selected essays (pp. 185–195). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social aspect of sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge (Sept 2), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meegan, R., & Mitchell, A. (2001). ‘It’s not community round here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 38, 2167–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T. (1994). The land use—Air quality linkage: How land use and transportation affect air quality. Sacramento: California Air Resources Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, J. (2002). Tackling social exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, A., & Houghton, J. (2007). Jigsaw cities: Big places, small spaces. policy: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon And Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragَn-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D., & Solecki, W. (2014). Urban areas. Climate change, pp. 535–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., & Woolley, H. (2003). Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment, 29(2), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkington, R., & Sangster, K. (2006). From housing to social mix: Housing’s contribution to social aspect of sustainability. Town And Country Planning, 75, 184–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Task Force. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance. London: Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, S., Perkins, H., & Dixon, J. (2011). What is social aspect of sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinthagen, S. (2013). Ten theses on why we need a “social science panel on climate change. Acme International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., & Rees, W. (1997). Urban density and ecological footprints—An analysis of Canadian households. In Mark Roseland (Ed.), Eco-City dimensions: Healthy communities, healthy planet. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehand J (1992) The making of the urban landscape. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiftachel, O., & Hedgcock, D. (1993). Urban social aspect of sustainability: The planning of an Australian city. Cities, 10, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1988). The postmodern debate over urban form. Theory, Culture & Society, 5(2–3), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homa Hedayat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hedayat, H. (2020). Assessing the Effects of Different Urban Forms on Social Sustainability: The Case of Tehran. In: Bougdah, H., Versaci, A., Sotoca, A., Trapani, F., Migliore, M., Clark, N. (eds) Urban and Transit Planning. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics