Abstract
One of the main functions of cities is to facilitate the participation of citizens in urban life through the use of urban spaces. Many urban areas lack the acceptable conditions for most urban behaviors and in general urban sustainability and sociability around the world. The concept of sustainable neighborhoods is one of the key factors in developed cities toward achieving sustainable development. Sustainable neighborhoods are related to different physical and social factors of the neighborhoods, which should have been investigated carefully. Although sustainability’s three main aspects are economic, social, and environmental, we have sought to focus our attention on the social aspect and examine how it is affected by various typologies of urban form. This work analyzes the physical and social organizations in neighborhoods and proposes patterns of social aspects of sustainability. It is based on models in the city of Tehran, Iran. Three neighborhoods representing the wide diversity of social sustainability and urban from among 22 neighborhoods were selected. This selection was made based on a GIS analysis which provided a North-South corridor containing enough diversity to model the whole city. From this corridor, we selected these three neighborhoods based on the Delphi method and systematic sampling. Applying the Delphi method to our model, neighborhoods with similar characteristics were removed and using three were chosen to represent the diversity of organic, planned, and mixed neighborhoods. In order to ensure a comprehensive understanding of both social aspects of sustainability and urban form for each neighborhood, field studies and the data collected from our questionnaire were combined. Field studies relied primarily on the expertise of the urban planner, while the questionnaire involved asking the residents, workers as well as the visitors a set of pre-designed questions covering a range of social factors. Subsequently, factor analysis was used to analyze the data gathered from the three neighborhoods. A basic general model indicating the relationship between urban form and social aspect of sustainably was derived. The general model was run in the three typologies, resulting in three distinct models for each typology, each model included a unique relationship between urban form factors and factors affecting social aspects of sustainability. The insights of this article in the relationship between social aspect of sustainability and urban form can enable the planner, through a collaborative scheme with users, to increase social aspect of sustainability by modifying urban form factors in neighborhoods with different typologies in the city of Tehran. The same process conducted here can be applied in any other city in the world, although the models would be different depending on the area’s culture, context, and socioeconomic status.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. https://Www.Google.Com/Books?Hl=En&Lr=&Id=V8cvcgaaqbaj&Oi=Fnd&Pg=Pp9&Dq=Sustainable+Communities&Ots=Aajctxatxn&Sig=Degzpubn-Py_Whk8i7qjn2knkpm.
Åhman, H. (2013). Social aspect of sustainability—Society at the intersection of development and maintenance. Local Environment, 18, 1153–1166.
Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S., & Andersson, K. (2013). Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio, 42, 215–228.
Barretti, G. (1996). The transport dimension. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form (pp. 171–180). London: E & Fn Spon.
Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social aspect of sustainability and urban form: Evidence from british cities. Environment.
Breheny, M. (1992). The contradictions of the compact city: A review. In Michael Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable Development and Urban Form (pp. 138–159). London: Pion.
Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: Just or just compact a preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 37, 1969–2001.
Carley, M., & Kirk, K. (1998). Sustainable by 2020? A strategic approach to urban regeneration for Britain’s cities. Policy: Bristol.
Chan, E., & Lee, G. (2008). Critical factors for improving social aspect of sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85, 243–256.
Clercq, F., & Bertolini, L. (2003). Achieving sustainable accessibility: An evaluation of policy measures in the amsterdam area. Built Environment, 29(1), 36–47.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Conzen, M. (2001). The study of urban form in the United States. Urban Morphology, 5(1), 3–14.
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social aspect of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19, 289–300.
Drakakis-Smith, D. (1995). Third world cities: Sustainable urban development, 1. Urban Studies, 32(4–5), 659–677.
Elkin, T., Mclaren, D., & Hillman, M. (1991). Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development. London: Friends Of The Earth.
Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Fischer, T. (2010). Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 62–69.
Folahan, A. A., Rukayat, A. B., & Kola Gbolagade, K. O. (2018). Urban sustainability concepts and their implications on urban form. Urban and Regional Planning, 3(1), 27–33.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Grieller, E., Littig, B. (2004). Soziale Nachhaltigkeit; Arbeiterkammer Wien, Ed.; Informationen Zur Mweltpolitik 160:Wien, Austria.
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.
Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5, 419–436.
Jabareen, Y. (2006). Sustainable urban forms their typologies, models and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 38–52.
Jacobs, M. (1999). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In Dobson A (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jenks, M. (2000). The acceptability of urban intensification. In K. Williams, E. Burton, & M. Jenks (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form. London: E & Fn Spon.
Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2005). Future forms and design for sustainable cities. Oxford: Architectural.
Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2007). Defi Ning the neighbourhood: Challenges for empirical research. Town Planning Review, 78, 153–177.
Kay, A. (2005). Territorial justice and devolution. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 544–560.
Lefebvre, H. (2009). Space: social product and use value. In N. Brenner & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, state, world: selected essays (pp. 185–195). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social aspect of sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 65–79.
Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge (Sept 2), London.
Meegan, R., & Mitchell, A. (2001). ‘It’s not community round here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 38, 2167–2194.
Parker, T. (1994). The land use—Air quality linkage: How land use and transportation affect air quality. Sacramento: California Air Resources Board.
Pierson, J. (2002). Tackling social exclusion. London: Routledge.
Power, A., & Houghton, J. (2007). Jigsaw cities: Big places, small spaces. policy: Bristol.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon And Schuster.
Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragَn-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D., & Solecki, W. (2014). Urban areas. Climate change, pp. 535–612.
Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., & Woolley, H. (2003). Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment, 29(2), 94–106.
Turkington, R., & Sangster, K. (2006). From housing to social mix: Housing’s contribution to social aspect of sustainability. Town And Country Planning, 75, 184–185.
Urban Task Force. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance. London: Spon.
Vallance, S., Perkins, H., & Dixon, J. (2011). What is social aspect of sustainability? A Clarification of Concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.
Vinthagen, S. (2013). Ten theses on why we need a “social science panel on climate change. Acme International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12, 155–176.
Walker, L., & Rees, W. (1997). Urban density and ecological footprints—An analysis of Canadian households. In Mark Roseland (Ed.), Eco-City dimensions: Healthy communities, healthy planet. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Whitehand J (1992) The making of the urban landscape. Blackwell.
Yiftachel, O., & Hedgcock, D. (1993). Urban social aspect of sustainability: The planning of an Australian city. Cities, 10, 139–157.
Zukin, S. (1988). The postmodern debate over urban form. Theory, Culture & Society, 5(2–3), 431–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hedayat, H. (2020). Assessing the Effects of Different Urban Forms on Social Sustainability: The Case of Tehran. In: Bougdah, H., Versaci, A., Sotoca, A., Trapani, F., Migliore, M., Clark, N. (eds) Urban and Transit Planning. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17307-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17308-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)