Abstract
In this chapter, we replicate previous research aimed at identifying those factors associated with solved residential burglaries, but in a large England and Wales context. A large number of factors were correlated with solved cases, but just 12 are effective solvability factors. This study confirms the findings of previous studies in identifying the following variables as effective solvability factors, a) fingerprints recovered; b) offender seen; c) witness recorded; d) offender’s vehicle sighted; e) offender disturbed; f) description of the suspect is recorded. However, this study advances the list of known solvability factors further by identifying six new variables that were traditionally overlooked and some of which result from advances in science, these are a) footwear marks; b) DNA; c) citizens’ reports on the burglary being in progress, d) the stolen property is recovered; e) articles left the scene by the offender and f) whether a vehicle was stolen in the crime. The magnitude of these effects, measured with standardised mean differences, suggest that the presence of these factors is strongly associated with solvability, some with very large effect sizes often exceeding Cohen’s d = 1.0. The analyses suggest that over 50% of all burglaries had one or more solvability factors present, and having one or more of these solvability factors was associated with over 60% accuracy in detection. If used as a screening tool, this solvability analysis approach Thames Valley Police would be required to investigate just over 40% of cases for investigation, as all other cases are unlikely to be solved. The policy implications of using solvability factors analysis is clear; implementing this approach as a screening tool enables police leaders to choose a suitable cut-off point that will allow an optimal balance between resource usage and detection levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ariel, B. (2012). Deterrence and moral persuasion effects on corporate tax compliance: findings from a randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 50(1), 27–69.
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., ... & Henderson, R. (2016a). Report: Increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: A protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3), 453–463.
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., ... & Henderson, R. (2016b). Wearing body cameras increases assaults against officers and does not reduce police use of force: Results from a global multi-site experiment. European Journal of Criminology, 13(6), 744–755.
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., ... & Henderson, R. (2017). “Contagious accountability” a global multisite randomized controlled trial on the effect of police body-worn cameras on citizens’ complaints against the police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 293–316.
Bloch, P. B., & Bell, J. (1976). Managing investigations: The Rochester system. Washington DC: The Police Foundation.
Burrows, J. (1986). Burglary: Police actions and victims’ views (Home Office Research and Planning Unit Paper 37). London: Home Office.
Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations (Home Office Research Study 295). London: Home Office.
Burrows, J., & Tarling, R. (1982). Clearing up crime. London: HMSO.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coupe, R. T., & Blake, L. (2005). The effects of patrol workloads and response strength on burglary emergencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 239–255.
Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary (Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Services, Paper 77). London: Home Office.
Donnellan, P. G. (2011). To what extent is burglary detection a consequence of effective investigation? (unpublished M.Sc. thesis). University of Cambridge.
Doyle, A. C. (1887). A study in scarlet. London: Ward, Lock and Co.
Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: The burglary investigation decision model replication. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Eck, J. E. (1983). Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery. Washington DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Eck, J. E., & Spelman, W. (1987). Who ya gonna call? The police as problem busters. Crime & Delinquency, 33(1), 31–52.
Greenberg, B., Elliot, C. V., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Greenberg, B., Yu, O., & Lang, K. (1973). Enhancement of the investigative function (Vol. I). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
Hogan-Howe, B. (2012, July 9). Total policing. Unpublished Lecture, Criminology Faculty, Cambridge University.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Robb, P., Coupe, T., & Ariel, B. (2015). ‘Solvability’ and detection of metal theft on railway property. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(4), 463–484.
Robinson, A., & Tilley, N. (2009). Factors influencing police performance in the investigation of volume crimes in England and Wales. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 209–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paine, C., Ariel, B. (2019). Population-Level Analysis of Residential Burglaries. In: Coupe, R., Ariel, B., Mueller-Johnson, K. (eds) Crime Solvability Factors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17159-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17160-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)