Abstract
In recent years, the ability to gather and store information has increased dramatically, and the ability to make use of these increasing volumes of data has improved. This advent of big data has opened up new opportunities for scientific research, including for research on climate change. These changes are associated with a number of interesting philosophical questions. This chapter provides an introduction to these questions. It starts by first clarifying terminological issues concerning “big data” and related terms and by giving an overview of big data elements that can be found in climate research. Second, it discusses data in climate research with a focus on new developments regarding the increase in the volume and complexity of climate data and on how the uncertainty of climate datasets may be assessed. Finally, the chapter addresses the topic of machine learning in climate research and specifically the use of machine learning for the data-driven modeling of climate phenomena. The focus of this discussion is on the representational accuracy of data-driven models and how it might be assessed and what this implies for their use for predictions and for understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Andersen, H., Cermak, J., Fuchs, J., Knutti, R., & Lohmann, U. (2017). Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and properties with global observations using neural networks. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 9535–9546. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-282
Barras, H., Hering, A., Martynov, A., Noti, P.-A., Germann, U., & Martius, O. (2019). Experiences with >50,000 crowdsourced hail reports in Switzerland. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(8), 1429–1440. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0090.1
Baumberger, C. (2019). Explicating objectual understanding taking degrees seriously. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 50, 367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09474-6
Baumberger, C., Knutti, R., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017). Building confidence in climate model projections: An analysis of inferences from fit. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(3), e454. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.454
Bokulich, A. (2018). Using models to correct data: Paleodiversity and the fossil record. Synthese, 198, 5919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x
Bokulich, A., & Parker, W. (2021). Data models, representation, and adequacy-for-purpose. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00345-2
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Buckner, C. (2019). Deep learning: A philosophical introduction. Philosophy Compass, 14(10), e12625. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12625
Chadwick, R., Coppola, E., & Giorgi, F. (2011). An artificial neural network technique for downscaling GCM outputs to RCM spatial scale. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 18(6), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-18-1013-2011
Cowtan, K., & Way, R. G. (2014). Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140(683), 1935–1944. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2297
Creel, K. A. (2020). Transparency in complex computational systems. Philosophy of Science, 87(4), 568–589. https://doi.org/10.1086/709729
Dahinden, F., Fischer, E. M., & Knutti, R. (2017). Future local climate unlike currently observed anywhere. Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 084004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa75d7
De Mauro, A., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features. Library Review, 65(3), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2015-0061
de Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding scientific understanding. Oxford University Press.
Deo, R. C., & Şahin, M. (2015). Application of the extreme learning machine algorithm for the prediction of monthly Effective Drought Index in eastern Australia. Atmospheric Research, 153, 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.016
Douglas, H. (2000). Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855
Elliott, K. C., & Rosenberg, J. (2019). Philosophical foundations for citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.155
Elmore, K. L., Flamig, Z. L., Lakshmanan, V., Kaney, B. T., Farmer, V., Reeves, H. D., & Rothfusz, L. P. (2014). MPING: Crowd-sourcing weather reports for research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(9), 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00014.1
Floridi, L. (2012). Big data and their epistemological challenge. Philosophy & Technology, 25(4), 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4
Frigg, R., Thompson, E., & Werndl, C. (2015). Philosophy of climate science part I: Observing climate change: Observing climate change. Philosophy Compass, 10(12), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12294
Frisch, M. (2015). Predictivism and old evidence: A critical look at climate model tuning. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-015-0110-4
Gagne, D. J., II, Haupt, S. E., Nychka, D. W., & Thompson, G. (2019). Interpretable deep learning for spatial analysis of severe hailstorms. Monthly Weather Review, 147(8), 2827–2845. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0316.1
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning, New York, pp. 1–10.
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G., & Yacalis, G. (2018). Could machine learning break the convection parameterization deadlock? Geophysical Research Letters, 45(11), 5742–5751. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078202
Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1086/425063
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2008). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer. Retrieved from http://www.myilibrary.com?id=18743
Hawkins, E., & Sutton, R. (2016). Connecting climate model projections of global temperature change with the real world. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00154.1
Hirsch Hadorn, G., & Baumberger, C. (2019). What types of values enter simulation validation and what are their roles? In C. Beisbart & N. J. Saam (Eds.), Computer simulation validation (pp. 961–979). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_40
Huntingford, C., Jeffers, E. S., Bonsall, M. B., Christensen, H. M., Lees, T., & Yang, H. (2019). Machine learning and artificial intelligence to aid climate change research and preparedness. Environmental Research Letters, 14, 124007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4e55
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7
Jones, G. D., Droz, B., Greve, P., Gottschalk, P., Poffet, D., McGrath, S. P., et al. (2017). Selenium deficiency risk predicted to increase under future climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11), 2848–2853. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611576114
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., et al. (2017). Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(10), 2318–2331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2720168
Kashiwao, T., Nakayama, K., Ando, S., Ikeda, K., Lee, M., & Bahadori, A. (2017). A neural network-based local rainfall prediction system using meteorological data on the Internet: A case study using data from the Japan Meteorological Agency. Applied Soft Computing, 56, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.015
Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In Proceedings of the 31st conference on neural information processing systems, Long Beach, pp. 1–11.
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G. (2016). What makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130
Knüsel, B. (2020). Epistemological issues in data-driven modeling in climate research (Diss. ETH No. 26626, ETH Zurich). ETH Zurich, Zurich. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000399735
Knüsel, B., & Baumberger, C. (2020). Understanding climate phenomena with data-driven models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 84, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.08.003
Knüsel, B., Zumwald, M., Baumberger, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Fischer, E. M., Bresch, D. N., & Knutti, R. (2019). Applying big data beyond small problems in climate research. Nature Climate Change, 9, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0404-1
Knüsel, B., Baumberger, C., Zumwald, M., Bresch, D. N., & Knutti, R. (2020). Argument-based assessment of predictive uncertainty of data-driven environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104754
Knutti, R., Baumberger, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2019). Uncertainty quantification using multiple models—Prospects and challenges. In C. Beisbart & N. J. Saam (Eds.), Computer simulation validation: Fundamental concepts, methodological frameworks, and philosophical perspectives. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2
Krasnopolsky, V. M., & Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S. (2006). Complex hybrid models combining deterministic and machine learning components for numerical climate modeling and weather prediction. Neural Networks, 19(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.002
Kryvasheyeu, Y., Chen, H., Obradovich, N., Moro, E., Van Hentenryck, P., Fowler, J., & Cebrian, M. (2016). Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science Advances, 2(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500779
Leonelli, S. (2012). Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.001
Leonelli, S. (2015). What counts as scientific data? A relational framework. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 810–821. https://doi.org/10.1086/684083
Leonelli, S. (2019a). Data—From objects to assets. Nature, 574, 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03062-w
Leonelli, S. (2019b). What distinguishes data from models? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0246-0
Lloyd, E. A. (2012). The role of “complex” empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43(2), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.02.001
Lloyd, E. A. (2015). Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 49, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.12.002
López-Rubio, E., & Ratti, E. (2019). Data science and molecular biology: Prediction and mechanistic explanation. Synthese, 198, 3131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02271-0
Lyon, A. (2015). Data. In P. Humphreys (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of science. Oxford University Press.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. John Murray. Retrieved from https://books.google.ch/books?id=DReelwEACAAJ
Medhaug, I., Stolpe, M. B., Fischer, E. M., & Knutti, R. (2017). Reconciling controversies about the “global warming hiatus”. Nature, 545(7652), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22315
Meinshausen, N. (2006). Quantile regression forests. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 983–999.
Muller, C. L., Chapman, L., Johnston, S., Kidd, C., Illingworth, S., Foody, G., et al. (2015). Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: Current status and future potential. International Journal of Climatology, 35(11), 3185–3203. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4210
Nasseri, M., Tavakol-Davani, H., & Zahraie, B. (2013). Performance assessment of different data mining methods in statistical downscaling of daily precipitation. Journal of Hydrology, 492, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.017
National Research Council. (2013). Frontiers in massive data analysis. The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/18374
Northcott, R. (2019). Big data and prediction: Four case studies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 81, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.09.002
Overeem, A., Robinson, J. C., Leijnse, H., Steeneveld, G. J., Horn, B. K. P., & Uijlenhoet, R. (2013). Crowdsourcing urban air temperatures from smartphone battery temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(15), 4081–4085. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50786
Overpeck, J. T., Meehl, G. A., Bony, S., & Easterling, D. R. (2011). Climate data challenges in the 21st century. Science, 331(6018), 700–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197869
Parker, W. S. (2010). Whose probabilities? Predicting climate change with ensembles of models. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1086/656815
Parker, W. S. (2016). Reanalyses and observations: What’s the difference? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(9), 1565–1572. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00226.1
Parker, W. S. (2017). Computer simulation, measurement, and data assimilation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv037
Parker, W. S. (2018). Climate science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/climate-science/
Parker, W. S. (2020). Model evaluation: An adequacy-for-purpose view. Philosophy of Science, 87(3), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/708691
Pietsch, W. (2015). Aspects of theory-ladenness in data-intensive science. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1086/683328
Pietsch, W. (2016). The causal nature of modeling with big data. Philosophy & Technology, 29(2), 137–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0202-2
Preis, T., Moat, H. S., Bishop, S. R., Treleaven, P., & Stanley, H. E. (2013). Quantifying the digital traces of Hurricane Sandy on Flickr. Scientific Reports, 3(3141), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03141
Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007). Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process – A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(11), 1543–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven earth system science. Nature, 566, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2014). Mapping the data shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the sociospatial dimensions of “big data”. Geoforum, 52, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.006
Sippel, S., Meinshausen, N., Fischer, E. M., Székely, E., & Knutti, R. (2020). Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale. Nature Climate Change, 10(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0666-7
Steele, K., & Werndl, C. (2018). Model-selection theory: The need for a more nuanced picture of use-novelty and double-counting. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw024
Sullivan, E. (2019). Understanding from machine learning models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73, axz035. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz035
Sun, A. Y., & Scanlon, B. R. (2019). How can Big Data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: A survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environmental Research Letters, 14(7), 073001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1b7d
Tapia, C., Abajo, B., Feliu, E., Mendizabal, M., Martinez, J. A., Fernández, J. G., et al. (2017). Profiling urban vulnerabilities to climate change: An indicator-based vulnerability assessment for European cities. Ecological Indicators, 78, 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040
Tavakol-Davani, H., Nasseri, M., & Zahraie, B. (2013). Improved statistical downscaling of daily precipitation using SDSM platform and data-mining methods. International Journal of Climatology, 33(11), 2561–2578. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3611
Tkachenko, N., Jarvis, S., & Procter, R. (2017). Predicting floods with Flickr tags. PLoS One, 12(2), e0172870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172870
Veltri, G. A. (2017). Big Data is not only about data: The two cultures of modelling. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717703997
Walker, W. E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Krayer von Krauss, M. P. (2003). Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466
Weisberg, M. (2006). Robustness analysis. Philosophy of Science, 73, 730–742.
Wilkenfeld, D. A. (2017). MUDdy understanding. Synthese, 194(4), 1273–1293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0992-x
Winsberg, E. (2018). Philosophy and climate science. Cambridge University Press.
Zumwald, M., Knüsel, B., Baumberger, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bresch, D. N., & Knutti, R. (2020). Understanding and assessing uncertainty of observational climate datasets for model evaluation using ensembles. WIREs Climate Change, 11(5), e654. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.654
Zumwald, M., Knüsel, B., Bresch, D. N., & Knutti, R. (2021). Mapping urban temperature using crowd-sensing data and machine learning. Urban Climate, 35, 100739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100739
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Knüsel, B., Baumberger, C., Knutti, R. (2023). Climate Research and Big Data. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_9-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_9-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities