Abstract
This chapter introduces the concept of anthropocentrism and its relevance for climate change: what is anthropocentrism, and what are the alternatives? In what sense is it a root cause of climate change? And to what extent are anthropocentric values reflected in proposed solutions? The first section provides an overview of anthropocentrism, looking at some of the main critiques of the concept made by environmental philosophers and ethicists and at the main non-anthropocentric alternatives they proposed, such as biocentrism and ecocentrism. The next section examines the connection between anthropocentrism and climate change, showing how anthropocentrism both legitimizes the practices that contribute to climate change and remains an obstacle to addressing it adequately. It also critically analyzes two important objections: first, the focus on anthropocentrism as the root cause of climate change unfairly implicates all humans and ways of life as the problem, and second, it obscures potentially more relevant causes such as capitalism. The last section considers the extent to which anthropocentrism is reflected in one specific plan of action to address climate change: the rapid transition to renewable energy. Taking into account the objections raised against anthropocentrism, this section suggests that an awareness of the anthropocentric dimensions of proposed solutions to climate change can help bring into focus important considerations about what values they uphold and who they truly serve.
References
Almiron, N., & Tafalla, M. (2019). Rethinking the ethical challenge in the climate deadlock: Anthropocentrism, ideological denial and animal liberation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09772-5
Attfield, R. (2014). Environmental ethics: An overview for the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Attfield, R. (2018). Environmental ethics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Barca, S. (2020). Forces of reproduction: Notes for a counter-hegemonic Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press.
Battistoni, A. (2017). Bringing in the work of nature: From natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory, 45(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716638389
Bookchin, M. (2005). What is social ecology? In M. E. Zimmerman, J. B. Callicott, K. J. Warren, I. J. Klaver, & J. Clark (Eds.), Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology (4th ed., pp. 462–478). Pearson Education.
Buller, A. (2022). The value of a whale. Manchester University Press.
Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. SUNY Press.
Carrington, D. (2022, November 7). Revealed: US and UK fall billions short of ‘fair share’ of climate funding. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/nov/07/us-uk-fall-billions-short-climate-funding-cop27
Crist, E. (2016). On the poverty of our nomenclature. In J. E. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism (pp. 14–33). PM Press.
Crist, E. (2019). Abundant Earth: Toward an ecological civilization. University of Chicago Press.
Davis, H., & Todd, Z. (2017). On the importance of a date, or, decolonizing the Anthropocene. Acme: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1539
Droz, L. (2022). Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: A review. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 22, 25–49. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00200
Friedman, L. (2019, February 21). What is the green new deal? A climate proposal explained. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html
Goodpaster, K. E. (1978). On being morally considerable. Journal of Philosophy, 75(6), 308–325.
Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and animals: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2011). Summary for policymakers. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, & C. von Stechow (Eds.), IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/SRREN_Full_Report-1.pdf
Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a dark time: Why the struggle against climate change failed – And what it means for our future. Oxford University Press.
Keller, D. R. (2010). In D. R. Keller (Ed.), Environmental ethics: The big questions. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Kingsnorth, P. (2017). Confessions of a recovering environmentalist and other essays. Faber & Faber.
Krenak, A. (2020). Ideas to postpone the end of the world. House of Anansi Press.
Lakhani, N. (2022, December 7). The food emissions ‘solutions’ alarming experts after COP27. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/07/false-food-solutions-experts-climate-cop27
Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.
Light, A. (2002). Contemporary environmental ethics from metaethics to public philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 33(4), 426–449.
Maitland, A., Lawson, M., et al. (2022). Carbon Billionaires: The investment emissions of the world’s richest people. Oxfam International. https://doi.org/10.21201/2022.9684
McKibben, B. (2022, November 22). Dimming the sun to cool the planet is a desperate idea, yet we’re inching toward it. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-a-warming-planet/dimming-the-sun-to-cool-the-planet-is-a-desperate-idea-yet-were-inching-toward-it
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper Collins.
Moore, J. E. (2019a, November 4). Who is responsible for the climate crisis? Maize. https://www.maize.io/magazine/what-is-capitalocene/
Moore, J. E. (Ed.). (2019b). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
Naess, A. (1995a). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. In A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology (pp. 3–9). North Atlantic Books.
Naess, A. (1995b). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. In A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology (pp. 13–30). North Atlantic Books.
Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6(2), 131–148.
OECD/FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en
Oppermann, S., & Iovino, S. (2017). The environmental humanities and the challenges of the Anthropocene. In S. Oppermann & S. Iovino (Eds.), Environmental humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Pearson, K. & Such, M. (2022, September 23). Inflation reduction act and renewable energy development: Its advantages and limitations. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/inflation-reduction-act-renewable-energy-development-its-advantages-limitations-2022-09-23/
Peterson, K. R. (2020). A world not made for us: Topics in critical environmental philosophy. SUNY Press.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge.
Rolston, H., III. (2005). Challenges in environmental ethics. In M. E. Zimmerman, J. B. Callicott, K. J. Warren, I. J. Klaver, & J. Clark (Eds.), Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology (4th ed., pp. 82–101). Pearson Education.
Sheldrake, M. (2020). Entangled life: How fungi make our worlds, change our minds & shape our futures. Random House.
Singer, P. (2005). All animals are equal. In M. E. Zimmerman, J. B. Callicott, K. J. Warren, I. J. Klaver, & J. Clark (Eds.), Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology (4th ed., pp. 25–38). Pearson Education.
Stone, C. D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Towards legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450–501.
Taylor, P. (1981). The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, 3(3), 197–218.
Taylor, M. & Watts, J. (2019, October 9). Revealed: The 20 firms behind a third of all carbon emissions. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions
Urkidi, L., & Walter, M. (2017). Environmental justice and large-scale mining. In R. Holifield, J. Chakraborty, & G. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environmental justice (pp. 374–387).
Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.
White, L., Jr. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1720120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tokay, E. (2023). Climate Change, Environmental Philosophy, and Anthropocentrism. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_107-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_107-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities