Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sociology and Ethics

Doing the Right Thing

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity

Abstract

The state of ethics in sociology today hinges, in part, on models which are inappropriate for many forms of social science research and, in part, move away from the hegemony of these models, with varying success across countries and regions. Australia and parts of Europe, for example, have made considerable strides in this matter. Considerations of ethics in sociology have expanded dramatically in a turn toward recognizing the agency of those whom we study. Conversations today center around mitigating power dynamics between researchers and participants, reflexivity on the part of the researcher, and an engagement with feminist and Indigenous methods. This has led to a proliferation of work on community-based research and the importance of trust-based relationships in social science work. Concerns around anonymity and confidentiality remain but are often at odds with the movement toward community-based and public policy research. Debates emphasize the challenge of doing ethical research under the current regime of regulatory boards, which operate in a legalistic and often exclusively positivist framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler PA (1993) Wheeling and dealing: an ethnography of an upper-level drug dealing and smuggling community. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PA, Adler P (1993) Ethical issues in self-censorship: Ethnographic research on sensitive topics. In: Renzetti CM, Lee RM (eds) Research Sensitive Topics. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker HS (1967) Whose side are we on? Soc Probl 14(3):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Blease K, Freyd JJ (2006) Research participants telling the truth about their lives: the ethics of asking and not asking about abuse. Am Psychol 61(3):218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell K (2014) Resisting commensurability: against informed consent as an anthropological virtue. Am Anthropol 116(3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergum V (1991) Being a phenomenological researcher. In: Morse J (ed) Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. Sage, London, pp 55–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya K (2007) Consenting to the consent form: what are the fixed and fluid understandings between the researcher and the researched? Qual Inq 13(8):1095–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe CH et al (2007) Regulating creativity: research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern Univ Law Rev 101(2):593–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Boser S (2007) Power, ethics, and the IRB: dissonance over human participant review of participatory research. Qual Inq 13(8):1060–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosk CL, De Vries RG (2004) Bureaucracies of mass deception: institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 595(1):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner E (2004) Ethnographic practice and human subjects review. Anthropol Newsl 45(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castleden H, Sloan Morgan V, Lamb C (2012) ‘I spent the first year drinking tea’: exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community-based participatory research involving indigenous peoples. Can Geogr 56(2):160–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress H (2006) The anthropologist and the crayons: changing our focus from avoiding harm to doing good. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 1(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T (2018) Collateral damage. In: Kleinknecht S, van den Scott L-JK, Sanders CB (eds) The craft of qualitative research. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, pp 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen P (2007) As ethics panels expand grip, no field is off limits” in New York Times 28 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn LG (2008) Ethics policy as audit in Canadian clinical settings: exiling the ethnographic method. Qual Res 8(4):499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty DS, Kramer MW (2005) Organizational power and the institutional review board. J Appl Commun Res 33(3):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA (1993) Ten lies of ethnography: moral dilemmas of field research. J Contemp Ethnogr 22(3):267–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine GA (1996) Kitchens: the culture of restaurant work. University of CA Press, Berkeley/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grills S (2018) Reconsidering relations in the field: attending to dominance processes in the ethnographic encounter. In: Kleinknecht S, van den Scott L-JK, Sanders CB (eds) The craft of qualitative research. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, pp 152–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (2009/2011) Ethical decision making in social research: a practical guide. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (2011) Ethical decision making in qualitative research. Qual Res 11(4):443–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (2017) Conclusion: guiding the ethics of online social media research – adaption or renovation? Adv Res Ethics Integr 2:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine JM (2012) Can’t ask, can’t tell: how institutional review boards keep sex in the closet. Contexts 11(2):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 19:173–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITK and NRI (2006) Nickels S, Shirley J, Laidler G (eds) Negotiating research relationships with Inuit communities: a guide for researchers. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute, Ottawa and Iqaluit. https://www.nri.nu.ca/sites/default/files/public/files/06-068_itk_nrr_booklet.pdf

  • Jacobs S (1980) Where have we come? Soc Probl 27:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz J (2007) Toward a natural history of ethical censorship. Law Soc Rev 41(4):797–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau A (2014) Unequal childhoods: class, race, and family life. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland JF (1971) Analyzing social settings. Wadsworth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus EF (2008) Perils of provocative scholarship. APS Obs 21(5). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/perils-of-provocative-scholarship

  • Lynch M (2000) Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Cult Soc 17(3):26–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Mah C (2018) Collecting social media data in qualitative research. In: Kleinknecht S, van den Scott L-JK, Sanders CB (eds) The craft of qualitative research. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, pp 245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddephatt AJ, Shaffir W, Kleinknecht SW (2009) Ethnographies revisited: constructing theory in the field. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo R (1993) Culture and truth: the remaking of social analysis. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DE (2010) Institutional ethnography as practice. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • South African San Institute (2017) San code of research ethics. Trust: equitable research partnerships. http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf

  • Spicker P (2011) Ethical covert research. Sociology 45(1):118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley JP (1979) The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurairajah K (2018) ‘The person behind the research:’ Reflexivity and the qualitative process. In: Kleinknecht S, van den Scott L-JK, Sanders CB (eds) The craft of qualitative research. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, pp 10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker A, Coomber V (2004) University research ethics committees: their role, remit and conduct. King’s College, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tummons J (2017) Institutional ethnography, theory, methodology, and research: Some concerns and some comments. In: Reid J, Russell L (eds) Perspectives on and from institutional ethnography. Studies in qualitative methodology, vol 15. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 147–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard WC (2011) The seduction of ethics: transforming the social sciences. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard DK (2012) Qualitative research in action. Oxford University Press, Don Mills

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard WC, Hamilton A (2016) The ethics rupture: exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Scott L-JK (2012) Science, politics, and identity in northern research ethics licensing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 7(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Scott L-JK (2013) Working with aboriginal populations: an attitude of learning. In: Sieber J, Tolich M (eds) Planning ethically responsible research, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 128–129

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Scott L-JK (2016) The socialization of contemporary students by ethics boards: malaise and ethics for graduate students. In: van den Hoonaard WC, Hamilton A (eds) The ethics rupture: exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 230–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Scott L-JK (2018) Role transitions in the field and reflexivity: from friend to researcher. Studies in Qual Method: (Special Issue) Emotion and the Researcher: Sites, Subjectivities and Relationships 16:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles R, Charles V, Crow G, Heath S (2006) Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics. Qual Res 6(3):283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield K, Iphofen R (2018) Introduction to volume 2: the ethics of online research. Adv Res Ethics Integr 2:1–12

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Smith LT (2012) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books Ltd., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard WC, van den Hoonaard DK (2016) Essentials of thinking ethically in qualitative research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada

    Lisa-Jo K. van den Scott

Authors
  1. Lisa-Jo K. van den Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa-Jo K. van den Scott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chatelaillon Plage, France

    Ron Iphofen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

van den Scott, LJ.K. (2020). Sociology and Ethics. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation