Skip to main content

Early Pregnancy Ultrasound

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine
  • 1035 Accesses

Abstract

Early pregnancy ultrasound is performed to assess the location of a pregnancy (intrauterine or extrauterine) and its viability. It also appraises the number of embryos and their chorionicity and amnionicity and often is instrumental in predicting the development, and dictates the management, of a pregnancy in the second and third trimester. Among the main objectives of the early pregnancy ultrasound are correct dating, evaluation of early pregnancy landmarks and placental location, and distinguishing normal from abnormal pregnancy. In addition, first trimester ultrasound allows evaluation of the ovaries and the corpus luteum.

Temporally, the first structure to be appreciated by ultrasound is the gestational sac, followed by the yolk sac, the embryo, and, when present, the embryonal cardiac activity. There is general consensus that the best technique to assess the early pregnancy is by transvaginal ultrasound: the higher resolution and the closer proximity of the transvaginal transducer allow the identification of structures such as a 2-mm gestational sac, or a 1-mm yolk sac, in addition to allowing excellent anatomical details of the embryo. In this chapter we will describe the evaluation of the first trimester singleton and multiple pregnancy using the transvaginal ultrasound technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M, Barnhart KT, Benacerraf BR, et al. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1443–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e91–e103. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagratee JS, Ragan L, Khullar V, Connolly C, Moodley J. Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:503–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Detti L, Francillon L, Christiansen ME, Peregrin-Alvarez I, Goedecke P, Boursac Z, Roman RA. Serial early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of pregnancy outcome: A logistic model. Under Revision, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tan S, Pektas MK, Arslan H. Sonographic evaluation of the Yolk sac. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Detti L, Christiansen ME, Roman RA, Peregrin-Alvarez I, Gini Ikwuezunma, Francillon L. Nomogram of yolk sac growth during the first trimester of pregnancy. Under revision, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rauch ER, Schattman GL, Christos PJ, Chicketano T, Rosenwaks Z. Embryonic heart rate as a predictor of first-trimester pregnancy loss in infertility patients after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2451–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. AIUM statement on the safe use of Doppler ultrasound during 11–14 week scans (or earlier in pregnancy). http://www.aium.org/officialStatements/42. Retrieved 2 May 2018.

  9. Jirasek JE. An atlas of human prenatal developmental mechanics: anatomy and staging. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Olive EC, Roberts CL, Nassar N, Algert CS. Test characteristics of placental location screening by transabdominal ultrasound at 18–20 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(7):944–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V, Ylostalo P. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12–16 weeks in a nonselected population. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):364–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Applebaum M. Predicting placental location – the pattern of decidual blood flow in early pregnancy using the gray-scale technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(4):299–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Detti L, Gordon J, Christiansen ME, Van de Velde NA, Francillon L, Peregrin-Alvarez I, Roman RA, Rogers AJ. Diagnosis of placental position by early first trimester ultrasound. Reprod Sci 2018;25:1218–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Magann EF, Doherty DA, Turner K, Lanneau GS Jr, Morrison JC, Newnham JP. Second trimester placental location as a predictor of an adverse pregnancy outcome. J Perinatol. 2007;27(1):9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gizzo S, Noventa M, Vitagliano A, et al. Sonographic assessment of placental location: a mere notional description or an important key to improve both pregnancy and perinatal obstetrical care? A large cohort study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13056–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(3):247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):225 e221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 150: early pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1258–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Orvieto R, Ben-Rafael Z, Ashkenazi J, Yoeli R, Messing B, Perri T, Shalev Y, Bar-Hava I. Outcome of pregnancies derived from assisted reproductive technologies: IVF versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:385–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, Chen D, Guang W, French J. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:577–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zinaman MJ, Clegg ED, Brown CC, O’Connor J, Selevan SG. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:503–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lathi RB, Milki AA. Tissue sampling technique affects accuracy of karyotype from missed abortions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:536–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Liu Y, Chen H, Li Q, Meng L, Chen L, Du T, Zhang J. Relationship of karyotype to embryo crown-rump length and maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin level in early Miscarriage. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(1):15–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stamatopoulos N, Lu C, Casikar I, Reid S, Mongelli M, Hardy N, Condous G. Prediction of subsequent miscarriage risk in women who present with a viable pregnancy at the first early pregnancy scan. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(5):464–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yi Y, Lu G, Ouyang Y, lin G, Gong F, Li X. A logistic model to predict early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization based on 2601 infertility patients. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016;14:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0147-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pillai RN, Konje JC, Richardson M, Tincello DG, Potdar N. Prediction of miscarriage in women with viable intrauterine pregnancy-A systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:122–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Datta MR, Raut A. Efficacy of first-trimester ultrasound parameters for prediction of early spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;138:325–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Berdhal DM, Blaine J, Van Voorhis B, Dokras A. Detection of enlarged yolk sac on early ultrasound is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1535–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ashoush S, Abuelghar W, Tamara T, Aljobboury D. Relation between types of yolk sac abnormalities and early embryonic morphology in first-trimester missed miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dubilet PM, Benson CB, Chow JS. Long-term prognosis of pregnancies complicated by slow embryonic heart rates in the early first trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:537–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(1):1–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Detti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Detti, L. (2019). Early Pregnancy Ultrasound. In: Stadtmauer, L., Tur-Kaspa, I. (eds) Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16699-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16699-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16698-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16699-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics