Skip to main content

Cultures as Semiotic Systems: Reconceptualizing Culture in a Systemic Perspective

  • Chapter
Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift
  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

This paper incorporates a broad understanding of culture into Mario Bunge’s systemist philosophy. Cultures are viewed as semiotic systems. Semiotic systems are symbolic systems along with their users. This approach makes it possible to relate immaterial symbolic systems to real material social systems via semiotic systems, which are neither purely material nor purely ideal, but combine elements of both. The goal is to sketch an ontology of culture that is consistent with emergentist materialism, and useful for the integration of culture into social science analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bunge’s definition of the concept of a system is as follows: “Complex object every part or component of which is related to at least one other component. Examples: an atom is a physical system composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons; […] a valid argument is a system of propositions held together by the relation of implication and the rules of inference; a language is system of signs held together by concatenation, meaning, and grammar” (Bunge 2003, p. 282).

  2. 2.

    “State-society” refers to modern societies contained in a territorial state, the standard sociopolitical system globally today.

  3. 3.

    This problem of “institutional transfer” has been widely discussed in development and post-communist transformation debates.

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1981). Scientific materialism. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1996). Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1998). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (2003). Philosophical dictionary (Enlarged ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., & Mahner, M. (Eds.). (2001). Scientific realism. Selected essays of Mario Bunge. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (2012). Tiny publics: A theory of group action and culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, R. (1998). Narrative analysis – Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullwiley, D. (2014). The ‘Contemporary Synthesis’: When politically inclusive genomic science relies on biological notions of race. Isis, 105(4), 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for? Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodelet, D. (2008). Social representations: The beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Small, M. L. (2008). Culture matters. The role of culture in explaining poverty. In D. Harris & A. Lin (Eds.), The colors of poverty: Why racial and ethnic disparities persist (pp. 76–102). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2005). Can cultural capital theory be reconsidered in the light of world polity institutionalism? Evidence from Spain. Poetics, 33(2), 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2011). Bourdieu as a post-cultural theorist. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C. (2008). Culture and organization theory. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, H., Hammer, M. R., & Wiseman, R. L. (1998). Cognitive differences between Japanese and Americans in their perceptions of difficult social situations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2003). Explaining, and explaining with, economic nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 9(1), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2004a). Systems and mechanisms: A symposium on Mario Bunge’s philosophy of social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2&3), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2004b). Homo nationis: The psychosocial infrastructure of the nation-state order. Global Society, 18(4), 324–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2006). The problem of order in the global age: Systems and mechanisms. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2007). Rethinking systems theory: A programmatic introduction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2012). Between Homo Sociologicus and Homo Biologicus: The reflexive self in the age of social neuroscience. Science and Education, 21(10), 1507–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2013). Nations, national cultures, and natural languages: A contribution to the sociology of nations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, A. (2015). Nacionalismo y violencia: una explicación mecanísmica. Con especial referencia a las teorías de Charles Tilly y Michael Mann. In Cultura y representaciones sociales. Revista electrónica de ciencias sociales. (Mexico D.F.) número 18 (marzo), 26–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2011). The world. A Beginner’s guide. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1993). A conceptual basis for cultural psychology. Ethos, 21(2), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (2010). Cross-cultural communication and miscommunication: The role of cultural keywords. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Pickel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pickel, A. (2019). Cultures as Semiotic Systems: Reconceptualizing Culture in a Systemic Perspective. In: Matthews, M.R. (eds) Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics