Skip to main content

Non-financial Information and Risk Disclosure: Compliance Levels with Mandatory Requirements in the Italian Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Risk Management, Volume II

Abstract

The study examines compliance levels of non-financial information (NFI thereafter) of 50 Italian listed companies, with a special emphasis on risk disclosure. We determine whether and to what extent companies are compliant with the Directive 2014/95/EU on NFI and risk disclosures. To achieve such objectives, the study develops a NFI disclosure score based on 165 items and analyzes the 2017 non-financial statements in accordance with the law; overall, 8250 text-units are collected. With reference to risks and opportunities, the findings suggest that companies unanimously identify potential risks but rarely disclose the potential dangers of these risks and the boundaries at which these risks may occur, which, in turn, may negatively influence business activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Public-interest entities are companies exceeding the criterion of the average number of 500 employees during the financial year and covering, at the end of the financial year, one of the following boundary: (a) total assets: 20,000,000 Euro, and (b) total revenues: 40,000,000 Euro.

Bibliography

  • Abdelrehim, N., Linsley, P., & Verma, S. (2017). Understanding risk disclosures as a function of social organisation: A neo-Durkheimian institutional theory-based study of Burmah Oil Company 1971 e 1976. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, S., & Shrives, P. J. (2014). Improving the relevance of risk factor disclosure in corporate annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1998). Jenkins Committee. Improving business reporting: A customer focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, E., Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (2003). Do financial analysts get intangibles? European Accounting Review, 12(4), 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., & Imam, S. (2008). Analysts’ perceptions of ‘earnings quality’. Accounting and Business Research, 38(4), 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39, 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2008). Quality versus quantity: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(3), 333–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0802300304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bini, L., Dainelli, F., & Giunta, F. (2017). Is a loosely specified regulatory intervention effective in disciplining management commentary? The case of performance indicator disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9334-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett, A., & Rezaee, Z. (2012). Corporate sustainability: Integrating performance and reporting. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, S. F., De Villiers, C., Jeter, D. C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2016). Are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross-country evidence. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 579–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1064009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantino, V., & Cortese, D. (2017). Integrated report system in Italian law. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, B. (1995). Accounting, ambiguity and the new institutionalism. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelli, M., Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2018). Normativity in environmental reporting: A comparison of three regimes. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3128-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. E. (1989). Disclosure in corporate annual reports of Swedish companies. Accounting and Business Research, 19(74), 113–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPA Canada. (2014). Management’s discussion and analysis—Guidance on preparation and disclosure.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk, M., de Villiers, C., & van Staden, C. (2015). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure on share prices: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devalle, A., Rizzato, F., & Busso, D. (2016). Disclosure indexes and compliance with mandatory disclosure—The case of intangible assets in the Italian market. Advances in Accounting, 35, 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., & Marques, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1039476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkens, M., Paugam, L., & Stolowy, H. (2015). Non-financial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, 21(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.213.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2017). Guidelines on non-financial reporting (methodology for reporting non-financial information). Official Journal of the European Union (December 2014), 1–20. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017XC0705(01)&from=EN.

  • European Parliament and the Council. (2013). Directive 2013/34/EU amending Directive 2006/43/EC and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings. Official Journal of the European Union (June 2013), L 182/19-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/.

  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2017). Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU—A comprehensive overview of how Member States are implementing the EU Directive on Non-financial and Diversity Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, O. (2015). Voluntary risk disclosure in corporate annual reports: An empirical review. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(17), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, A., Link, M., & Groß, T. (2017). The term ‘non-financial information’—A semantic analysis of a key feature of current and future corporate reporting. Accounting in Europe, 9480, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1374548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure—Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW. (2000). No surprises: The case for better risk reporting. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajüter, P., & Winkler, C. (2003). Die Risikoberichterstattung der DAX100-Unternehmen im Zeitvergleich. Kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, 5(2003), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G. S. (2014). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2014.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2017). What do stakeholders care about? Investigating corporate social and environmental disclosure in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2844-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangena, M., Li, J., & Tauringana, V. (2016). Disentangling the effects of corporate disclosure on the cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 31(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14541443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Frías-aceituno, J. V. (2015). Relationship between sustainable development and financial performance. International empirical research, 39(July 2013), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1803.

  • Martínez-Ferrero, J., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2015). Effect of financial reporting quality on sustainability information disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melloni, G., Caglio, A., & Perego, P. (2017). Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in integrated reports. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miihkinen, A. (2012). What drives quality of firm risk disclosure? The impact of a national disclosure standard and reporting incentives under IFRS. International Journal of Accounting, 47(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2012.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30, 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. (2017a). Are the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosures associated with the innate and discretionary earnings quality? Journal of Business Ethics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3546-y.

  • Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. (2017b). Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance. Advances in Accounting, 39(May 2016), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.08.001.

  • Robb, S. W. G., Single, L. E., & Zarzeski, M. T. (2001). Nonfinancial disclosures across Anglo-American countries. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T., Michelon, G., & Paananen, M. (2018). Environmental and social matters in mandatory corporate reporting: An academic note. Accounting Perspectives, 17(2), 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12173.

  • Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (2000). The chairman’s statement—A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010353738.

  • Stolowy, H., & Paugam, L. (2018). The expansion of non-financial reporting: An exploratory study. Accounting and Business Research, 4788. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470141.

  • Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2015). Secondary stakeholder influence on CSR disclosure: An application of stakeholder salience theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2623-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Rizzato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

Ref.

Directive 2014/95/EU

Topic disclosure

N. items

% of companies disclosing such information

Related references

Art. 19a—environmental issues

Materials

3

24

GRI 301 –

G4-EN1, EN2, EN28

Energy

4

42

GRI 302-1

G4-EN3, EN4, EN5, EN6, EN7

Water

3

33

GRI 303 –

G4-EN8, EN9, EN10

Biodiversity

4

12

GRI 304 –

G4-EN11

Emissions

7

52

GRI 305 –

G4-EN15, EN16, EN17, EN18, EN19, EN20, EN21

Effluents and waste

5

26

GRI 306 – EN22, EN23, EN24, EN25, EN26

Environmental compliance

1

54

GRI 307 –

G4-EN29

Supplier environmental assessment

2

25

GRI 308 –

G4-EN32, EN33

Art. 19a—social issues

Local communities

2

35

GRI 413 –

G4-SO1, SO2

Supplier social assessment

2

41

GRI 414 –

G4-HR10, HR11

Public policy

1

32

GRI 415 – SO6

Customer health and safety

2

42

GRI 416 – PR1, PR2

Marketing and labeling

3

38

GRI 417 –

G4-PR3, PR4, PR7

Customer privacy

2

56

GRI 418 –

G4-PR8, PR9

Socioeconomic compliance

1

52

GRI 419-1 –

G4-PR9

Art. 19a—employees

Employment

3

58.6

GRI 401-1 –

G4-LA1, LA2, LA3

Labor/management relations

1

54

GRI 402-1 –

G4-LA4

Occupational health and safety

4

42

GRI 403-1 –

G4-LA5, LA6, LA7, LA8

Training and education

3

62

GRI 404-1 –

G4-LA9, LA10, LA11

Art. 19a—human rights

Non-discrimination

1

60

GRI 406-1,

G4-HR3

Freedom of association and collective bargaining

1

34

GRI 407-1 –

G4-HR4

Child Labor

1

32

GRI 408-1 – G4-HR5

Forced or Compulsory Labor

1

28

GRI 409-1 – G4-HR6

Security practices

1

16

GRI 410-1 – G4-HR7

Rights of indigenous peoples

1

16

GRI 411-1 –

G4-HR8

Human rights assessment

3

30

GRI 412-1 –

G4-HR9, HR2, HR1

Art. 19a—anti-corruption

Anti-corruption

3

62.6

GRI 205-1 –

G4-SO3, SO4, SO5

Anti-competitive behavior

1

50

GRI 206-1 –

G4-SO7

Diversity

Diversity and equal opportunity

2

71

GRI 405-1 –

G4-LA12, LA13

“Context” Topics

Art. 19a—business model, policies, outcomes, risks and opportunities, KPIs

Business model (general description)

3

55.3

<IR> Framework

BM—input

1

48

<IR> Framework

BM—business activities

3

64.7

<IR> Framework

BM—outcomes

4

35

<IR> Framework

Management approach (materiality, topic boundaries, targets, responsibilities, actions and practices, mechanisms to evaluate the management process)

14

65.2

GRI 103-1, GRI 103-2, GRI 103-3

Materiality determination process

2

64

<IR> Framework

Qualitative disclosure of material matters—current period

5

56.5

Authors’ elaboration

Qualitative disclosure of material matters—present period

5

96.4

Authors’ elaboration

Qualitative disclosure of material matters—forward-looking period

5

15

Authors’ elaboration

Risk and opportunities (for each topic: identification, effects on the business relationship, actions to manage)

15

57.8

Authors’ elaboration

KPIs (for each topic): current period

5

74

Authors’ elaboration

 

KPIs (for each topic): prior period

5

58

 
 

KPIs (for each topic): forward-looking period

5

6

 
 

KPIs (for each topic): benchmark

5

3

 
 

KPIs (for each topic): measurement methods

5

24

 

Others

Economic performance

4

38.5

GRI 201-1 –

G4-EC1, EC2, EC3, EC4

Market presence

2

24

GRI 202-1 –

G4-EC5, EC6

Indirect economic impacts

2

34

GRI 203-1 –

G4-EC7, EC8

Procurement practices

1

54

GRI 204-1 –

G4-EC9

Ethics and integrity

2

69

GRI 102-16 –

G4-56, G4-57

Stakeholder engagement

4

85.5

GRI 102-40, 42, 43, 44 – G4-24, G4-25, G4-26, G4-27

 

Total

165

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rizzato, F., Busso, D., Fiandrino, S., Cantino, V. (2019). Non-financial Information and Risk Disclosure: Compliance Levels with Mandatory Requirements in the Italian Market. In: De Vincentiis, P., Culasso, F., Cerrato, S. (eds) The Future of Risk Management, Volume II. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16526-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16526-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16525-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16526-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics