Skip to main content

Spectacle, Trauma, Patriotism: Media and Media Studies in the Aftermath of 9/11

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
9/11 and the Academy

Abstract

To say that Media Studies changed drastically on 9/11 is an understatement. Change came in three areas. First, the media provided the means by which most people experienced the event. Second, media offered a narrative that made 9/11 more personal by telling stories of the victims and those involved in the attacks. Third, media contributed to the strengthening of an American sense of patriotism, opening the way for and justifying the “war on terror.” This chapter argues that the field of Media Studies was turned on its head on September 11, 2001.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The statement was shared during a Q&A at the “9/11 and Academia” Conference held at Emory and Henry College in November 2015.

  2. 2.

    I anticipate leaving out some elements that other scholars might find fundamental in order to understand the many ways the field has changed as a consequence of 9/11. For this, I would like to apologize in advance.

  3. 3.

    Megan O’Toole provides a brief summary of the Toronto Hearings events in this blog: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/the-truthers-are-out-there-toronto-hearings-on-the-events-of-september-11.

  4. 4.

    Excerpts of this discussion have previously been published in Prosopopeya, 9 (20142015): 59–60.

  5. 5.

    Examples can be found in at least two interviews, one on Fox with Chris Wallace: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1007046245001/exclusive-jon-stewart-on-fox-news-sunday/#sp=show-clips and one on MSNBC with Rachel Maddow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWrkGu4XpZQ.

References

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 2002. The Spirit of Terrorism: And Requiem for the Twin Towers. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Marsha, and Max Schleser (eds.). 2014. Mobile Media Making in an Age of Smartphones. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkenstein, Jee, Anna Froula, and Karen Randell (eds.). 2010. Reframing 9/11: Film, Popular Culture, and the “War on Terror”. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Jacqueline. 2004. Cultivating Critical Eyes: Teaching 9/11 Through Video and Cinema. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briefel, Aviva, and Sam J. Miller (eds.). 2011. Horror After 9/11: World of Fear, Cinema of Terror. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cettl, R. 2009. Terrorism in American Cinema: An Analytical Filmography, 1960–2008. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletta, Lisa. 2009. Political Satire and Postmodern Irony in the Age of Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart. The Journal of Popular Culture 42 (5): 856–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debord, Guy. 1977. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Wheeler W. 2004. Film and Television After 9/11. Carbondale: SIU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, Chiara Francesca. 2014–2015. The Taming of the Stew(ie): Family Guy, Italian Dubbing, and Post-9/11 Television. Prosopopeya 9: 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Matthew (ed.). 2016. Industrial Approaches to Media: A Methodological Gateway to Industry Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, L. 2005. Is Kiefer Sutherland Trying to Sell You Something. MacLean’s 118 (8): 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2012. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henry A. 2004. Pedagogy, Film, and the Responsibility of Intellectuals: A Response. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, Luke. 2009. Social News, Citizen Journalism and Democracy. New Media & Society 11 (8): 1287–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Amy Laura. 2013. Torture and Television in the United States. Muslim World 103 (2): 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hark, Ina Rae. 2004. Today Is the Longest Day of My Life. In Film and Television After 9/11, 121–141. Carbondale: SIU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Dana (ed.). 2005. The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida, Alfred, et al. 2012. Share, Like, Recommend: Decoding the Social Media News Consumer. Journalism Studies 13 (5–6): 815–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmielowski, Jay D., R. Lance Holbert, and Jayeon Lee. 2011. Predicting the Consumption of Political TV Satire: Affinity for Political Humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report. Communication Monographs 78 (1): 96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbert, R. Lance, et al. 2007. Primacy Effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young Viewers, Political Gratifications, and Internal Political Self-Efficacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 51 (1): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughey, Matthew, and Sahara Muradi. 2009. Laughing Matters: Economies of Hyper-Irony and Manic Satire in South Park and Family Guy. Humanity & Society 33: 206–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. 2004. Applied Humanism: The Re:Constructions Project. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Jeffrey P., and Geoffrey Baym. 2010. A Dialogue on Satire News and the Crisis of Truth in Postmodern Political Television. Journal of Communication Inquiry 34 (3): 278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Berenike. 2010. Narrating Violence in Post-9/11 Action Cinema: Terrorist Narratives, Cinematic Narration, and Referentiality. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kakutani, Michiko. 2008. Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America. The New York Times, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 2005. Trauma Culture: The Politics of Terror and Loss in Media and Literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas. 2010. Cinema Wars: Hollywood Film and Politics in the Bush-Cheney Era. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, Aaron Michael. 2015. Torture Porn in the Wake of 9/11: Horror, Exploitation, and the Cinema of Sensation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D. Landreville, and Michael A. Beam. 2009. The Irony of Satire Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in the Colbert Report. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (2): 212–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, Marcia. 2004. ‘America Under Attack’: Peral Harbor, 9/11, and History in the Media. In Film and Television After 9/11, ed. Wheeler Winston Dixon, 79–100. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Andrew, and Patrice Petro. 2006. Rethinking Global Security: Media, Popular Culture, and the “War on Terror”. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, Graham. 2002. Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, Jason. 2010. Television and American Culture. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren, T., and S. Shahaf (eds.). 2013. Global Television Formats: Understanding Television Across Borders. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, Megan. 2011. The Truthers Are Out There: Toronto Hearings on the Events of September 11. National Post, September 9. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/the-truthers-are-out-there-toronto-hearings-on-the-events-of-september-11. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.

  • Pakistan Press Foundation. http://www.pakistanpressfoundation.org/. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.

  • Parks, G., and M. Hughey. 2011. 12 Angry Men: True Stories of Being a Black Man in America Today. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, Lisa, and Shanti Kumar (eds.). 2003. Planet TV: A Global Television Reader. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Projansky, Sarah. 2004. Teaching Through Feelings and Personal Beliefs: 9/11 as Case Study. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retort (Collective), et al. 2005. Afflicted Powers: Capital and Spectacle in a New Age of War. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. Ruby. 2004. After the Fall: Cinema Studies Post-9/11. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Mark David, and Greg Hearn. 2010. Next-Generation ‘Filmmaking’: New Markets, New Methods and New Business Models. Media International Australia 136 (1): 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salaita, Steven. 2005. Ethnic Identity and Imperative Patriotism: Arab-Americans Before and After 9/11. College Literature 32 (2, Spring): 146–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sienkiewicz, Matt, and Nick Marx. 2014. Click Culture: The Perils and Possibilities of Family Guy and Convergence-Era. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11 (2): 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, David. 2011. 9/11 Film and Media Scholarship. Cinema Journal 51 (1, Fall): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Louise. 2004. Teaching 9/11 and Why I’m Not Doing It Anymore. Cinema Journal 43 (2): 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, Lynn. 2004. Entertainment Wars: Television Culture After 9/11. American Quarterly 56 (2): 235–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesler, M., and D.O. Sears. 2010. Obama’s Race: The 2008 Election and the Dream of a Post-racial America. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimarco, James, and Molly Hurley Depret. 2005. Wounded Nation, Broken Time. In The Selling of 9/11, 27–53. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veeren, Elspeth. 2009. Interrogating 24: Making Sense of US Counter-Terrorism in the Global War on Terrorism. New Political Science 31 (3, September): 361–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, Paul. 2002. Ground Zero. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, P. 2007. So What Are You Saying? An Oil Consortium’s Behind the Nuke?’ 24, Programme Sponsorship, SUVs, and the ‘War on Terror’. Ed. Steven Peacock, 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. Welcome to the Desert of the Real! Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Ferrari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferrari, C. (2019). Spectacle, Trauma, Patriotism: Media and Media Studies in the Aftermath of 9/11. In: Finney, M., Shannon, M. (eds) 9/11 and the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16418-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16419-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics