Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cranioplasty: Does Timing Have Any Effect on the Degree of Neurological Recovery or the Complication Rate?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence for Neurosurgery

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy is commonly performed to relieve elevated intracranial pressure caused by trauma, stroke, hemorrhage, or edema [1–9]. Cranioplasty is often subsequently performed to restore cranial cosmesis, provide cerebral protection, and facilitate neurological rehabilitation [10, 11]. Cranioplasty itself has been shown to provide neurological improvement and the question of how long to wait before cranioplasty has received considerable attention [12–18]. Most surgeons wait for recovery from the initial indication for decompressive craniectomy with resolution of edema and inflammation, but often these patients can be lost to follow up for months to years [19]. Recent studies indicate that earlier cranioplasty may improve neurologic recovery and avoid certain complications [12, 15, 18, 19]. This chapter will use findings from two published meta-analyses on the association between the timing of cranioplasty on neurological improvement and complication rate to evaluate the current level of evidence and provide clinical and research recommendations [12, 18].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA, Carusillo B, Karimy JK, Gerzanich V, et al. Complications associated with decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(2):292–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohman L-E, Schuster JM. Decompressive craniectomy for management of traumatic brain injury: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13(11):392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(3):215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening edema trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(4):326–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fung C, Murek M, Z’Graggen WJ, Krähenbühl AK, Gautschi OP, Schucht P, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esquenazi Y, Savitz SI, El Khoury R, McIntosh MA, Grotta JC, Tandon N. Decompressive hemicraniectomy with or without clot evacuation for large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;128:117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao B, Zhao Y, Tan X, Cao Y, Wu J, Zhong M, et al. Primary decompressive craniectomy for poor-grade middle cerebral artery aneurysms with associated intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;133:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang US, Shin HS, Lee SH, Koh JS. Decompressive surgery in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clipping with simultaneous decompression versus coil embolization followed by decompression. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2014;16(3):254–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Holsgrove DT, Kitchen WJ, Dulhanty L, Holland JP, Patel HC. Intracranial hypertension in subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome after decompressive craniectomy. In: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. 53–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dujovny M, Aviles A, Agner C, Fernandez P, Charbel FT. Cranioplasty: cosmetic or therapeutic? Surg Neurol. 1997;47(3):238–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feroze AH, Walmsley GG, Choudhri O, Lorenz HP, Grant GA, Edwards MSB. Evolution of cranioplasty techniques in neurosurgery: historical review, pediatric considerations, and current trends. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(4):1098–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Chokshi F, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, et al. Early cranioplasty is associated with greater neurological improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(3):278–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Piedra MP, Ragel BT, Dogan A, Coppa ND, Delashaw JB. Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(1):109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuss P, Vatter H, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Ulrich CT, Seifert V, et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(6):1090–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(4):1124–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Servadei F, Iaccarino C. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(2):133–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mustroph CM, Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, et al. Cranioplasty infection and resorption are associated with the presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;33:39–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thavarajah D, Lacy PD, Hussien A, Sugar A. The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection-a case series of 82 patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26(1):78–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):873–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Group OL of EW. The Oxford levels of evidence 2 [Internet]. Centre for evidence-based medicine. 2009. Available from, http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653

  23. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bender A, Heulin S, Röhrer S, Mehrkens JH, Heidecke V, Straube A, et al. Early cranioplasty may improve outcome in neurological patients with decompressive craniectomy. Brain Inj. 2013;27(9):1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paredes I, Castaño-León AM, Munarriz PM, Martínez-Perez R, Cepeda S, Sanz R, et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. A prospective series analyzing complications and clinical improvement. Neurocirugia. 2015;26(3):115–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang YH, Lee TC, Yang KY, Liao CC. Is timing of cranioplasty following posttraumatic craniectomy related to neurological outcome? Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):886–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM. The incidence of neurologic susceptibility to a skull defect. World Neurosurg. 2016;86:147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cho KC, Park SC. Safety and efficacy of early cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury patients. J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc. 2011;7(2):74–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cong Z, Shao X, Zhang L, Zhao D, Zhou X, Yi C, et al. Early cranioplasty improved rehabilitation in patients with traumatic skull injuries. Neurosurg Q. 2016;26(2):103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuo JR, Wang CC, Chio CC, Cheng TJ. Neurological improvement after cranioplasty–analysis by transcranial doppler ultrasonography. J Clin Neurosci. 2004;11(5):486–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang G, Yang W, Jiang Y, Zeng T. Extensive duraplasty with autologous graft in decompressive craniectomy and subsequent early cranioplasty for severe head trauma. Chinese J Traumatol. 2010;13(5):259–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nagayama K, Yoshikawa G, Somekawa K, Kohno M, Segawa H, Sano K, et al. Cranioplasty using the patient’s autogenous bone preserved by freezing–an examination of post-operative infection rates. Neurol Surg. 2002;30(2):165–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim Y-W, Yoo D-S, Kim D-S, Huh P-W, Cho K-S, Kim J-G, et al. The infection rate in case of cranioplasty according to used materials and skull defect duration. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2001;30:S216–20.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Archavlis E, Carvi Y, Nievas M. The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(6):1055–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D. Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):1120–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaturvedi J, Botta R, Prabhuraj AR, Shukla D, Bhat DI, Indira Devi B. Complications of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(2):264–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cheng YK, Weng HH, Yang JT, Lee MH, Wang TC, Chang CN. Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(10):1115–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chun H-J, Yi H-J. Efficacy and safety of early cranioplasty, at least within 1 month. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(1):203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26(6):E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hng D, Bhaskar I, Khan M, et al. Delayed cranioplasty: outcomes using frozen autologous bone flaps. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;08(03):190–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Im SH, Jang DK, Han YM, Kim JT, Chung DS, Park YS. Long-term incidence and predicting factors of cranioplasty infection after decompressive craniectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;52(4):396–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SP, Kang DS, Cheong JH, Kim JH, Song KY, Kong MH. Clinical analysis of epidural fluid collection as a complication after cranioplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56(5):410–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Haq I, Hettige S, Martin AJ. Complications of titanium cranioplasty–a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(5):989–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Piitulainen JM, Kauko T, Aitasalo KMJ, Vuorinen V, Vallittu PK, Posti JP. Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(5):708–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosseto RS, Giannetti AV, De Souza Filho LD, Faleiro RM. Risk factors for graft infection after cranioplasty in patients with large hemicranial bony defects. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Song J, Liu M, Mo X, Du H, Huang H, Xu GZ. Beneficial impact of early cranioplasty in patients with decompressive craniectomy: evidence from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(1):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsang AC-O, Hui VK-H, Lui W-M, Leung GK-K. Complications of post-craniectomy cranioplasty: Risk factor analysis and implications for treatment planning. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(5):834–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Walcott BP, Kwon C-S, Sheth SA, et al. Predictors of cranioplasty complications in stroke and trauma patients. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(4):757–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang S, Park H, Cho S. The current analysis of the risk factors for bone graft infection after cranioplasty. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2013;9(2):57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(3):187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50(2):177–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index a simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md State Med J. 1965;14:56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ditunno JFJ. Functional assessment measures in CNS trauma. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S301–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):127–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F, Li G, Lou R, Liu WG, et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir. 2008;150(12):1241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Annan M, De Toffol B, Hommet C, Mondon K. Sinking skin flap syndrome (or syndrome of the trephined): a review. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(3):314–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stiver SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26(6):E7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Halani SH, Chu JK, Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Allen JW, Grossberg JA, et al. Effects of cranioplasty on cerebral blood flow following decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(2):204–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stiver SI, Wintermark M, Manley GT. Reversible monoparesis following decompressive hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(2):245–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Winkler PA, Stummer W, Linke R, Krishnan KG, Tatsch K. Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(1):53–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lazaridis C, Czosnyka M. Cerebral blood flow, brain tissue oxygen, and metabolic effects of decompressive craniectomy. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(3):478–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stelling H, Graham L, Mitchell P. Does cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy improve consciousness? Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25(3):407–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Muramatsu H, Takano T, Koike K. Hemiplegia recovers after cranioplasty in stroke patients in the chronic stage. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(2):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Coulter IC, Pesic-Smith JD, Cato-Addison WB, Khan SA, Thompson D, Jenkins AJ, et al. Routine but risky: a multi-centre analysis of the outcomes of cranioplasty in the Northeast of England. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(7):1361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Clark SW, Bovenzi CD, Saigh M, et al. Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(1):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Waziri A, Fusco D, Mayer SA, McKhann GM, Connolly ES. Postoperative hydrocephalus in patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Piedra MP, Thompson EM, Selden NR, Ragel BT, Guillaume DJ. Optimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;10(4):268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rocque BG, Amancherla K, Lew SM, Lam S. Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12(2):120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Zayan Mahmooth

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    James G. Malcolm, Rima S. Rindler & Faiz U. Ahmad

Authors
  1. Zayan Mahmooth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James G. Malcolm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rima S. Rindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Faiz U. Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zayan Mahmooth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Ronald H. M. A. Bartels

  2. Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Maroeska M. Rovers

  3. Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Gert P. Westert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahmooth, Z., Malcolm, J.G., Rindler, R.S., Ahmad, F.U. (2019). Cranioplasty: Does Timing Have Any Effect on the Degree of Neurological Recovery or the Complication Rate?. In: Bartels, R., Rovers, M., Westert, G. (eds) Evidence for Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16323-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16323-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16322-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16323-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation