Skip to main content

Open Versus Endoscopische Cubital Tunnel Release

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence for Neurosurgery

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome is a symptomatic ulnar nerve dysfunction at the elbow region probably caused by a combination of compression, traction and friction. Static and dynamic factors are involved, leading to ischemia or mechanical compression, secondary to repeated elbow flexion, anatomic variants of muscles and ulnar nerve subluxation. It is the second most common form of nerve entrapment after carpal tunnel syndrome [1]. Several surgical techniques exist for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release has been reported as a promising minimally invasive technique. This chapter aims to compare outcomes and complications of open cubital tunnel release (OCTR) and endoscopic tunnel release (ECTR) in the treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Studies including adults with idiopathic cubital tunnel treated exclusively by ECTR or OCTR were included. Outcomes of interest were postoperative clinical outcome, satisfaction, pain, ability to work and complications. Postoperative clinical outcomes were dichotomized into 2 categories: improved or not improved. Results: 6 studies met the inclusion criteria (1 RCT and 5 observational), representing 156 open and 247 endoscopic decompressions. In the open group, 79% experienced improvement of clinical symptoms with 16% complication rate. In the endoscopic group, 86% experienced clinical improvement with 8% complication rate. No statistical significant differences were found for satisfaction and pain scores and ability to work. Conclusions: This review demonstrates similar effectiveness between the endoscopic (ECTR) and open (OCTR) techniques for treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome with similar clinical outcomes and complication profiles. Keywords: compression neuropathy, cubital tunnel, endoscopic, ulnar nerve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Ballerini M, Ginanneschi F, Martorelli E. Incidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in the province of Siena (Italy). J Neurol Sci. 2005;234:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boone S, Gelberman RH, Calfee RP. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1897–1904; quiz 1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Morana P, Rossi S. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: predictive value of clinical and electrophysiological measurements for surgical outcomes. Electromyogr Clin Neurphysiol. 2004;44:349–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dellon L, Chang E, Coert JH, Campbell KR. Intraneural ulnar nerve pressure changes related to operative techniques for cubital tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19(6):923–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dellon L. Review of treatment results of for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14A:688–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McGowan A. The results of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1950;32B(3):293–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dellon L. Diagnosis and treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2000;4(2):127–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, Giannini F, Padua L. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(7):CD006839.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dutch Guideline for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: richtlijn neuropathie van de nervus ulnaris bij de elleboog, 2011 door Nederlandse Vereniging van Neurologie in samenwerking met de Nederlandse Vereniging voor plastiche Chirurgie en Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurochirurgie (pp. 0–88).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai T, Chen I, Majd M, Lim B. Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:21–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann R, Siemionow M. The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2006;31:23–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dellon L, MacKinnon S. Injury to the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during cubital tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Br. 1985;10:33–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ren Y, Zhou X, Qiao H, Wei Z, Fan B, Lin W, et al. Open versus endoscopic in situ decompression in cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;35:104–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchanan P, Chieng L, Hubbard Z, Law T, Chim H. Endoscopic versus open in situ cubital tunnel release: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 655 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(3):679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Furlan A, Malmivaara A, Chou R, Maher C, Deyo R, Schoene M, et al. 2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the cochrane back and neck group. Spine. 2015;40(21):1660–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl E, Rind D, Vandvik P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. A guide for health professionals to interpretet and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;72:45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysis. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watts A, Bain G. Patient-rated outcome of ulnar nerve decompression: a comparison of endoscopic and open in situ decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1492–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saint-Cyr M, Lakhiany C, Tsai T. Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparative analysis of outcome using four different techniques. Eur J Plast Surg. 2013;36:693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dützmann S, Martin K, Sobottka S, et al. Open vs retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:605–16; discussion 614–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolster M, Zöphel O, van den Heuvel E, Ruettermann M. Cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39:621–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bacle G, Marteau E, Freslon M, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92 months. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(Suppl):S205–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt S, Kleist Welch-Guerra W, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Schminke U, Schroeder H. Endoscopic vs open decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:960–70; discussion 970–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Race C, Saldana M. Anatomic course of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during cubital tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg. 1991;16:48–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lowe J, Maggi S, Mackinnon S. The position of crossing branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve during cubital tunnel surgery in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:692–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mirza A, Mirza J, Lee B, et al. An anatomical basis for endoscopic cubital tunnel release and associated clinical outcome. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:1363–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oertel J, Keiner D, Gaab M. Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:817–24; discussion 824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van der Heijden, B.E.P.A., Coert, H.J. (2019). Open Versus Endoscopische Cubital Tunnel Release. In: Bartels, R., Rovers, M., Westert, G. (eds) Evidence for Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16323-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16323-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16322-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16323-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics