Skip to main content

Sustainability in Higher Education: The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Followers’ Innovative Outcomes A Framework Proposal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability on University Campuses: Learning, Skills Building and Best Practices

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Higher Education Institutes (HEI) initiate, accelerate and facilitate regional and national development through human capital development, knowledge creation, innovation capacity building and technology transfer. As contemporary global challenges are of a mixed and multi-dimensional nature, interdisciplinary education and innovative research are needed more than ever. Thus, leaders of HEI are required to transform their institutions to respond to these challenges and the pressures created by global dynamics. This study is dedicated to designing a framework to enhance the relationship between the leadership styles and their followers’ innovative outputs. The suggested framework is based on the model of Kong et al. for leadership implicit follower theory (LIFT) and suggests the transformational leadership (TL) style to initiate the positive LIFT. This methodology proposes a set of indicators to assess innovation outputs quantitatively and intends to use engineering schools of HEIs as a sample to test the framework. It is suggested that this framework can be adjusted to examine different HEIs, colleges and R&D institutes in different contexts and at multiple leadership levels. The main outcome of this study is a framework that can be used to evaluate, assess and train existing or prospective HEI leaders, develop tailored human resources strategies, and design leadership training for students, researchers and young faculty members for their future career development in creative ventures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afuah A (1998) Innovation management. Strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alshuwaikhat HM, Abubakar I (2008) An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. J Clean Prod 16:1777–1785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis J, Cianciolo AT, Sternberg RJ (2004) Leadership: past, present, and future. In: Antonakis J, Cianciolo AT, Sternberg RJ (eds) The nature of leadership. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio BJ, Bass BM (2004) MLQ—multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Awartani M, Looney JJ (2015) Learning and well-being: an agenda for change. Presented at the WISE Summit, Qatar Foundation, Qatar, 3–5 Nov 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakkar AK (2015) Introduction to integrated development: an Islamic vision, 5th edn. Damascus, Dar Alqalam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks G (2008) Australia’s productivity challenge and human capital. In: Presentation by the chair of the productivity commission. Eidos Institute, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Rieckmann M (2012) Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. J Clean Prod 26:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1652–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj S, Menon A (2000) Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? J Prod Innov Manag 17(6):424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer P (2013) Assessing sustainability and social responsibility in higher education assessment frameworks explained. In: Caeiro S, Filho W, Jabbour C, Azeiteiro U (eds) Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Springer, UK, pp 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke J (2000) The knowledge web, 1st edn. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustani A, Lozano R (2003) Re: Preguntas sobre Desarrollo Sostenible, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2017) The global innovation index 2017: innovation feeding the world. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa J, Morales V, Pozo E (2007) Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: lessons from Spain. Ind Mark Manage 36(3):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denman BD (2009) What is a university in the 21st century? High Educ Manage Policy 17:9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch Bank (2008) The broad basis of societal progress. Deutsch Bank Research, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lima S, Alho C, Zeidler O, Muller B (2015) Assessment tool for building materials—the role of the odor. Energy Procedia 78:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disterheft A, Caeiro S, Azeiteiro UM, Filho WL (2015) Sustainable universities—a study of critical success factors for participatory approaches. J Clean Prod 106:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton L (2003) Dissemination of innovations in higher education: a change theory approach. Tert Educ Manage 9(3):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL (2005) The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In: Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B (eds) The science of well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes JB, Domm DR (2004) Creativity and productivity: resolving the conflict. SAM Adv Manage J 69(2):4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav 26(4):331–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Morales VJ, Matías-Reche F, Verdu-Jover AJ (2011) Influence of internal communication on technological proactivity, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. J Commun 61:150–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A (2009) Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Bus Res 62:461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J (2009) Visible learning; a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:1122–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung DI, Chow C, Wu A (2003) The Role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadersh Q 14(4–5):525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung D, Wu A, Chow CW (2008) Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. Leadersh Q 19(5):582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn KB (ed) (2005) The PDMA handbook of new product development, 2nd edn. Wiley, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester RJ, Eflin J, Vann J (2006) Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approach. J Clean Prod 14(9–11):769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong M, Xu H, Zhou A, Yuan Y (2017) Implicit followership theory to employee creativity: the roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. J Manage organ 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao SH, Wu CC (2010) System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Syst Appl 37:1096–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R (2003) Sustainable development in higher education. Incorporation, assessment, and reporting of sustainable development in higher education institutions. Master thesis, IIIEE, Lund University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Almeida M (2015) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EC, Martins N (2002) An organizational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. Spec Edn SA J Ind Psychol 28(4):58–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldan B, Janousková S, Hak T (2012) How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Ind 17:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder DKF (2000) From environmental training to engineering for sustainable development, a return ticket?. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadersh Q 13(6):705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00158-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod JE (2012) Essentials of educational psychology: big ideas to guide effective teaching. Pearson, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff C, Kinicki AJ, Muhammad RS (2013) Organizational culture and climate. In: Handbook of psychology, 2nd edn, pp 12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova M, Maclean R (2013) Vocationalisation of secondary and tertiary education: challenges and possible future directions. In: Maclean R, Jagannathan S, Sarvi J (eds) Skills development for inclusive and sustainable growth in developing Asia-Pacific. In: Technical and vocational education and training: issues, concerns and prospects, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri 6 (1993) Innovation by nonprofit organizations: policy and research issues. Nonprofit Manage Leadersh 3:397–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130030406

  • Petrov G (2006) The leadership foundation research on collective leadership in higher education. Leadersh Matters 7(11):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14(1):15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price RM (2007) Infusing innovation into corporate culture. Organ Dyn 36(3):320–328. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic161082.files/Reading_Materials_Week_2/Infusing_innovation_into_corp_culture.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A (2011) Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q 22(5):956–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley DJ, Sherman H (2003) The special challenges of academic leadership. Manage Decis 41(10):1058–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros JC, Cooper BK, Santora JC (2008) Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organization culture. J Leadersh Organ Stud 15:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman M, Ernst R, Gillham J, Linkins M (2009) Positive education: positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education 35:293–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton D (2008) Regional protection of human rights. Oxford University Press 1163. ISBN 9780195371659

    Google Scholar 

  • Shondrick SJ, Lord RG (2010) Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader-follower processes. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol 25(1):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka P (1998) Legal measures and tax incentives for encouraging science and technology development: the examples of Japan, Korea and India. Technol Soc 20(1):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney PT, Farmer SM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad Manage J 45(6):1137–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley P, Sy T, Johnson SK (2012) Leaders’ conceptions of followers: implications for naturally occurring pygmalion effects. Leadersh Q 23(5):822–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reem S. Al-Mansoori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Al-Mansoori, R.S., Koç, M. (2019). Sustainability in Higher Education: The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Followers’ Innovative Outcomes A Framework Proposal. In: Leal Filho, W., Bardi, U. (eds) Sustainability on University Campuses: Learning, Skills Building and Best Practices. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics