Abstract
This chapter challenges stereotypical depictions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a neoliberal discourse and argues that there is a need for greater awareness of the ‘varieties of liberalism’ at play in CSR. It shows how the work of Michel Foucault and post-Foucauldian studies on neoliberalism can be used to disentangle ideological strands in the CSR debate that are often jumbled together, but which differ from each other in important ways. While the chapter distinguishes between four varieties of liberalism, its main analytical focus is how understandings of CSR informed by classical liberalism are different from understandings embodying a neoliberal mindset. It argues that the foremost exemplars of a neoliberal imagination in the broad field of CSR are Michael Porter and Mark Kramer, who, with their work on strategic CSR/creating shared value, are explicitly turning social responsibility into an economic value proposition. Overall, the chapter makes a contribution toward clarifying the political language with which we can speak about different approaches to CSR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We should mention that Friedman (1970) also speaks of ‘shared values’. He does, however, attribute a very different meaning to the term. He argues that there are no ‘social’ responsibilities in any other sense than the shared values and responsibilities of individuals. In other words, he uses this term to argue for the primacy of the individual over the social, not to argue for the prospects of economic value creation.
References
Aakhus, M., & Bzdak, M. (2012). Revisiting the role of “shared value” in the business-society relationship. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 31(2), 231–246.
Amable, B. (2011). Morals, politics and the ideology of neo-liberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 3–30.
Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility—The good, the bad and the ugly. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Boas, T. C., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 137–161.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism (pp. 2–32). Oxford: Blackwell.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of ‘creating shared value’. California Management Review, 56(2), 130–149.
Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2008). The corporate social responsibility agenda. In A. Crane, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 3–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crook, C. (2005, January 22). The good company—A sceptical look at corporate social responsibility. The Economist, 1–8.
Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2015). Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 231–267.
Driver, M. (2012). An interview with Michael Porter: Social entrepreneurship and the transformation of capitalism. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 421–431.
Flew, T. (2012). Michel Foucault’s the birth of biopolitics and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven, 108(1), 44–65.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of bio-politics: Lectures at Collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2007). Moral views of market society. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 285–311.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 17.
Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2014). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 483–509.
Gamble, A. (2001). Neo-liberalism. Capital and Class, 25, 127–134.
Garsten, C., & Jacobsson, K. (2013). Post-political regulation: Soft power and post-political visions in global governance. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 421–437.
Hanlon, G. (2008). Rethinking corporate social responsibility and the role of the firm—On the denial of politics. In A. Crane, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 156–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The corporation in a democratic society: In whose interest ought it and will it be run? In I. Ansoff (Ed. 1969), Business Strategy (pp. 225–239). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue—False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Hursh, D. W., & Henderson, J. A. (2011). Contesting global neoliberalism and creating alternative futures. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(2), 171–185.
Jones, D. S. (2012). Masters of the universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the birth of neoliberal politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Karnani, A. (2011). Doing well by doing good: The grand illusion. California Management Review, 53(2), 69–86.
Kinderman, D. (2011). ‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of corporate social responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 29–57.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine. The rise of disaster capitalism. London: Allen Lane.
Konings, M. (2010). Neoliberalism and the American state. Critical Sociology, 36(5), 741–765.
Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25.
Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture and Society, 26(6), 109–133.
Leitner, H., Sheppard, E. S., Sziarto, K., & Maringanti, A. (2007). Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In H. Leitner, E. S. Sheppard, & J. Peck (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 1–25). New York: Guilford Press.
Lemke, T. (2001). The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.
Lemke, T. (2007). An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 43–64.
Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–50.
Levy, D. L., & Kaplan, R. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and theories of global governance: Strategic contestation in global issue areas. In A. Crane, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 432–451). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lohr, S. (2011, August 13). First, make money. Also, do good. New York Times.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.
Midttun, A. (2005). CSR: Realigning roles and boundaries between government, business and civil society. Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(3), 159–174.
Mirowski, P. (2009). Postface: Defining neoliberalism. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 417–455). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.) (2009). The Road from Mont Pèlerin. USA: Harvard University Press.
Mudge, S. L. (2008). The state of the art. What is neo-liberalism? Socio-Economic Review, 6, 703–731.
Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002, December). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 5–16.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006, December). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January–February). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 62–78.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2014). A response to Andrew Crane et al. article by Michael E. Porter & Mark R. Kramer. California Management Review, 56(2), 149–51.
Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36.
Richter, U. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.
Sadler, D., & Lloyd, S. (2009). Neo-liberalising corporate social responsibility: A political economy of corporate citizenship. Geoforum, 40, 613–622.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.
Shamir, R. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669–689.
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.
Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Science, 43, 49–72.
Turner, R. (2007). The ‘rebirth of liberalism’: The origins of neo-liberal ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 12(1), 67–83.
Utting, P. (2007). CSR and equality. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 697–712.
Vallentin, S. (2015). Instrumental and political currents in the CSR Debate: On the demise and (possible) resurgence of ‘ethics’. In A. Pullen & C. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge companion to ethics, politics and organizations (pp. 13–31). London: Routledge.
Vallentin, S., & Murillo, D. (2012). Governmentality and the politics of CSR. Organization, 19(6), 825–843.
Vallentin, S., & Spence, L. (2017). Strategic CSR: Ambitions and critiques. In A. Rasche, M. Morsing, & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility—Strategy, communication, governance (pp. 63–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Horn, R. & Mirowski, P. (2009). The rise of the Chicago school of economics and the birth of neoliberalism. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 139–178). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
van Oosterhout, J., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2008). Much ado about nothing: A conceptual critique of corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 197–223). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vallentin, S., Murillo, D. (2019). CSR and the Neoliberal Imagination. In: Sales, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change. Ethical Economy, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15407-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15407-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15405-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15407-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)