Skip to main content
  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we present two ontology-driven learning support systems, which intend to provide meaningful learning environment: a customizable language learning support system (CLLSS) and a visualization learning support system for e-book users (VSSE). CLLSS was built to provide an interface for the learning objects arrangement which displays the visual representation of knowledge points and their relations. The intention underlying the development of CLLSS is to encourage instructors to orient their teaching materials to specific knowledge points and even directly to relations between knowledge points. With these orientations, CLLSS is able to provide an environment in which learners can readily distinguish between related knowledge points. In the other hand, VSSE is designed and developed to help e-book learners to effectively construct their knowledge frameworks. Making use of e-book logs, VSSE supports not only meaningful receptive learning but also meaningful discovery learning. In other words, two learning modes are provided in VSSE: (a) reception comparison mode, in which learners are provided directly with complete versions of relation maps; and (b) cache-cache comparison mode, where all information concerning relations is hidden at the first stage of learning, and in the second stage learners are encouraged to actively create them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, K. K., Lee, C. I., & Tsai, R. S. (2011). Ontology technology to assist learners’ navigation in the concept map learning system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 11293–11299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicheva, D., & Dichev, C. (2006). TM4L: creating and browsing educational topic maps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Albarran, M., & Jimenez-Diaz, G. (2009). Recommendation and students’ authoring in repositories of learning objects: A case-based reasoning approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 4, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). Using ontological engineering to organize learning/instructional theories and build a theory-aware authoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2004). A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources and influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(7), 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. H., & Segev, A. (2012). Knowledge maps for e-learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K. Y., Lee, H. W., & Grabowski, B. (2009). Does concept-mapping strategy work for everyone? The levels of generativity and learners’ self-regulated learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 606–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansur, A. B. F., & Yusof, N. (2013). Social learning network analysis model to identify learning patterns using ontology clustering techniques and meaningful learning. Computers & Education, 63, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Available at http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Development, 32(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltramari, A., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., & Masolo, C. (2002). Restructuring WordNet’s top-level: The OntoClean approach. In Workshop Proceedings of OntoLex’2, Ontologies and Lexical Knowledge Bases (LREC2002), Spain (pp. 17–26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosnovsky, S., & Gavrilova, T. (2006). Development of educational ontology for C-programming. International Journal Information, Theories & Applications, 13(4), 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsien, J. Z. (2007). The memory. Scientific American, 297(July), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Brendan, F., & Ogata, H. (2017). Semi-automatic construction of ontology based on data mining technique. In International Conference on Learning Technologies and Learning Environments (LTLE) 2017, IEEE CPS (pp. 511–515). Washington, DC: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Mendori, T. (2012). A course-centered ontology of Japanese grammar for a language learning support system. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (KES2012), 243, 654–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Mendori, T., & Xiong, J. (2013). A customizable language learning support system using ontology-driven engine. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 11(4), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., & Mendori, T. (2015). An evaluation of the learning attitude and motivation in a language learning support system. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies and Technology-enhanced Learning (ICALT 2015), Hualien, Taiwan. Washington, DC: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., Mendori, T., & Xiong, J. (2014). A language learning support system using course-centered ontology and its evaluation. Computer & Education, 78, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., Mendori, T., & Hoel, T. (2018). Strategies for multimedia learning object recommendation in a language learning support system: Verbal learners vs. Visual learners. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., Ogata, H., & Shimada, A. (2017). A meaningful discovery learning environment for e-book learners. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, April 25–28, 2017. Washington, DC: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, X., Fu, H., Xia, H., Yang, L., & Shang, M. (2015). A hybrid cognitive assessment based on ontology knowledge map and skills. Knowledge-Based Systems, 73, 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by KAKENHI Grant Number 17K17936, the Research and Development on Fundamental Utilization Technologies for Social Big Data (No. 178A03), and the Commissioned Research of National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, J. (2019). Ontology Technique and Meaningful Learning Support Environments. In: Sampson, D., Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Isaías, P., Sergis, S. (eds) Learning Technologies for Transforming Large-Scale Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15130-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15130-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15129-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15130-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics