Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Media in Health Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Web and Health Research

Abstract

In the past 10 years, social media usage and the development of new social media platforms have grown rapidly in the United States. This new technology enables users to socialize and exchange knowledge with other users in a virtual community. Social media also has a number of advantages over other modes of communication including the ability to track and analyze communication, tailor information for individual users, and reach a broad audience in a short amount of time. Many health care providers have already started piloting social media-based interventions to improve patient care and population health. This chapter describes the current application of social media in health communication, beginning with a definition of social media and health communication, and then focusing on examples of social media usage across the spectrum of health care. The chapter also reviews current guidelines for health care professionals’ use of social media and limitations of social media use, such as privacy and quality concerns. The chapter concludes with implications for future research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Statista: most famous social network sites worldwide as of July 2018, ranked by number of active users (in millions). 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.

  2. Statista: number of social media users worldwide from 2010 to 2021 (in billions). 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/.

  3. Statistica: social media usage in the United States—Statistics & Facts. 2017. https://www.statista.com/topics/3196/social-media-usage-in-the-united-states/.

  4. Social Media & User-Generated Content: United States: number of social network users 2015–2022: Statista. 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278409/number-of-social-network-users-in-the-united-states/.

  5. Social Media & User-Generated Content: share of U.S. population with a social media profile 2008–2018: Statista. 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273476/percentage-of-us-population-with-a-social-network-profile/.

  6. Statistica: daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2017 (in minutes). 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/.

  7. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(2):169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Correa T, Hinsley AW, de Zúñiga HG. Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(2):247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2007;12(4):1143–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e14118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavallo DN, Tate DF, Ries AV, Brown JD, DeVellis RF, Ammerman AS. A social media–based physical activity intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):527–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bull SS, Levine DK, Black SR, Schmiege SJ, Santelli J. Social media–delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):467–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Project Hope). 2009;28(2):361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance tracking online health information and cyberbehavior for public health. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S154–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL. Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(3):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Hanson CL, McKenzie JF. Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9(4):338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma M, Yadav K, Yadav N, Ferdinand KC. Zika virus pandemic—analysis of Facebook as a social media health information platform. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(3):301–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seeman N, Ing A, Rizo C. Assessing and responding in real time to online anti-vaccine sentiment during a flu pandemic. Healthc Q (Toronto, Ont). 2010;13:8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khatri C, Chapman SJ, Glasbey J, Kelly M, Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, et al. Social media and internet driven study recruitment: evaluating a new model for promoting collaborator engagement and participation. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Frandsen M, Walters J, Ferguson SG. Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;16(2):247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bull SS, Levine D, Schmiege S, Santelli J. Recruitment and retention of youth for research using social media: experiences from the Just/Us study. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud. 2013;8(2):171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016;25(2):113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17(4):541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chou W-yS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kontos EZ, Emmons KM, Puleo E, Viswanath K. Communication inequalities and public health implications of adult social networking site use in the United States. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 3):216–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. De Bruyn A, Lilien GL. A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. Int J Res Mark. 2008;25(3):151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mo PKH, Coulson NS. Exploring the communication of social support within virtual communities: a content analysis of messages posted to an Online HIV/AIDS Support Group. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(3):371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liang B, Scammon DL. E-Word-of-Mouth on health social networking sites: an opportunity for tailored health communication. J Consum Behav. 2011;10(6):322–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shaw LH, Gant LM. In defense of the internet: the relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002;5(2):157–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart M, Craig D, MacPherson K, Alexander S. Promoting positive affect and diminishing loneliness of widowed seniors through a support intervention. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18(1):54–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dickerson FB, Sommerville J, Origoni AE, Ringel NB, Parente F. Outpatients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder: do they differ in their cognitive and social functioning? Psychiatry Res. 2001;102(1):21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moreno MA, Kaseeska K, Gorzkowski J, Harris D, Pbert L, Davis J, et al. Testing a pediatrician-delivered guidelines–based social media intervention. Pediatrics. 2018;141(1 MeetingAbstract):241.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mingoia J, Hutchinson AD, Gleaves DH, Wilson C. The impact of a social media literacy intervention on positive attitudes to tanning: a pilot study. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;90:188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang J, Brackbill D, Yang S, Centola D. Efficacy and causal mechanism of an online social media intervention to increase physical activity: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:651–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Gnagnarella P, Misotti AM, Santoro L, Akoumianakis D, Del Campo L, De Lorenzo F, et al. Nutritional online information for cancer patients: a randomized trial of an internet communication plus social media intervention. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(3):472–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Adams SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: an inter-disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):391–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fernandez-Luque L, Elahi N, Grajales FJ 3rd. An analysis of personal medical information disclosed in YouTube videos created by patients with multiple sclerosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:292–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Friedman DB, Koskan A, Rose ID. Prostate cancer guidelines on Web 2.0-based sites: the screening dilemma continues online. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(1):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Statista: percentage of population using the internet in the United States from 2000 to 2016. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Statista: share of adults in the United States who use the internet in 2018, by ethnicity. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Statista: countries with the highest internet penetration rate as of 2016. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Governing Institute: Internet Connectivity, Usage Statistics for States. 2013. http://www.governing.com/gov-data/internet-usage-by-state.html.

  46. USNEWS: Internet Access Rankings: measuring how well and how fast citizens can access the internet. 2018. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/infrastructure/internet-access.

  47. Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, Walsh SP. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):739–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Handbook of personality: theory and research, vol. 2. New York: Guilford; 1999. p. 102–38.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Amichai-Hamburger Y. Internet and personality. Comput Hum Behav. 2002;18(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2003;19(1):71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Wainapel G, Fox S. “On the Internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002;5(2):125–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53(1):59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Obar JA, Wildman SS. Social media definition and the governance challenge—an introduction to the special issue. Telecommun Policy 2015;39(9):745–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Merriam-Webster: social media. 2018. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20media.

  55. Grajales Iii FJ, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Statista: Share of internet users in the United States with accounts on selected social media platforms as of February 2018, by age group. 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/200548/users-with-social-site-accounts-by-age-group/.

  57. Pew Research Center: Teens, Social Media & Technology. 2018. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.

  58. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: ACM The Free Press (Sept. 2001); 1995. p. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chang HC. A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: diffusion of innovation theory. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;47(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)—The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF): Health Communication and Health Information Technology. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: What is Health Communications? 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/healthbasics/WhatIsHC.html.

  62. Services H. Healthy people 2010: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what’s in a name? Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Finnegan JR, Viswanath K. Communication theory and health behavior change: the media studies framework. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice; 2002. p. 363–84.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rothman AJ, Bartels RD, Wlaschin J, Salovey P. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun. 2006;56(suppl_1):S202–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Brewer NT, Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(2–3):107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Langford CPH, Bowsher J, Maloney JP, Lillis PP. Social support: a conceptual analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(1):95–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kreuter MW, Buskirk TD, Holmes K, Clark EM, Robinson L, Si X, et al. What makes cancer survivor stories work? An empirical study among African American women. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(1):33–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kreuter MW, Green MC, Cappella JN, Slater MD, Wise ME, Storey D, et al. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(3):221–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Chou W-YS, Hunt Y, Folkers A, Augustson E. Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: a narrative analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Olson JK. Relationships between nurse-expressed empathy, patient-perceived empathy and patient distress. Image J Nurs Scholarsh. 1995;27(4):317–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kim K, Kwon N. Profile of e-patients: analysis of their cancer information-seeking from a national survey. J Health Commun. 2010;15(7):712–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Black PC, Penson DF. Prostate cancer on the internet—information or misinformation? J Urol. 2006;175(5):1836–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wikblad KF. Patient perspectives of diabetes care and education. J Adv Nurs. 1991;16(7):837–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):507–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care. Interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(2):105–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson Hohne S, Hu TM, Levine BA, Conlin PR. Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1624–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S. Health professionals’ attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(3):287–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Doull M, O’Connor AM, Welch V, Tugwell P, Wells GA. Peer support strategies for improving the health and well-being of individuals with chronic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD005352.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dennis CL. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40(3):321–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Takahashi Y, Uchida C, Miyaki K, Sakai M, Shimbo T, Nakayama T. Potential benefits and harms of a peer support social network service on the internet for people with depressive tendencies: qualitative content analysis and social network analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Egan KG, Moreno MA. Prevalence of stress references on college freshmen Facebook profiles. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(10):586–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Househ M. Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: a cross-sectional study. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(3):470–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Tips From Former Smokers. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/index.html.

  89. Increases in quitline calls and smoking cessation website visitors during a national tobacco education campaign—March 19-June 10, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(34):667–70.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Smith AK, Van Wagenen SB. Adoption and use of social media among public health departments. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Harris JK, Mueller NL, Snider D. Social media adoption in local health departments nationwide. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):1700–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Gardner M, Steinberg L. Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Moreno MA, VanderStoep A, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Kurth A, Christakis DA. Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: a randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(1):35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Patten CA, Rock E, Meis TM, Decker PA, Colligan RC, Pingree S, et al. Frequency and type of use of a home-based, internet intervention for adolescent smoking cessation. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(5):437–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Veinot TC, Campbell TR, Kruger D, Grodzinski A, Franzen S. Drama and danger: the opportunities and challenges of promoting youth sexual health through online social networks. AMIA Ann Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1436–45.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Young SD, Rice E. Online social networking technologies, HIV knowledge, and sexual risk and testing behaviors among homeless youth. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(2):253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: E-cigarette Ads and Youth. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/ecigarette-ads/index.html.

  99. Richardson A, Ganz O, Vallone D. Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising. Tob Control. 2015;24(4):341–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. Youth Internet users at risk for the most serious online sexual solicitations. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(6):532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Institute of Medicine Committee on institutional policy-level strategies for increasing the diversity of the U.S. Healthcare Workforce. In: Smedley BD, Stith BA, Bristow LR, editors. In the Nation’s compelling interest: ensuring diversity in the health-care workforce. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  102. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. HHS action plan to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities: a nation free of disparities in health and health care. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. People H. Conclusion and future directions: CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report—United States, 2013. MMWR Suppl. 2013;62(3):184–6.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Anderson M. Pew Research Center: Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/03/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-lower-income-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption/.

  106. Perrin A. Pew Research Center: Smartphones help blacks, Hispanics bridge some—but not all—digital gaps with whites. 2017. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/08/31/smartphones-help-blacks-hispanics-bridge-some-but-not-all-digital-gaps-with-whites/.

  107. Federal Communications Commission Telecommunications Access Policy Division: Universal Service. 2018. https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service.

  108. FACT SHEET: Government Programs Designed to Close the Divide. In: Administration USDoCNTaI, editor. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Lorence DP, Park H, Fox S. Racial disparities in health information access: resilience of the digital divide. J Med Syst. 2006;30(4):241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou W-YS, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(7):e172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Huo J, Desai R, Hong Y-R, Turner K, Mainous III AG, Bian J. Use of social media in health communication: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013, 2014, and 2017. Cancer Control. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Laz TH, Berenson AB. Racial and ethnic disparities in internet use for seeking health information among young women. J Health Commun. 2013;18(2):250–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Fung IC-H, Tse ZTH, Cheung C-N, Miu AS, Fu K-W. Ebola and the social media. Lancet. 2014;384(9961):2207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Carter M. How Twitter may have helped Nigeria contain Ebola. BMJ. 2014;349

    Google Scholar 

  115. Modahl M, Tompsett L, Moorhead TQ. Doctors. Patients & Social Media, QuantiaMD. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1168–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(5):777–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Miller EA, Pole A. Diagnosis blog: checking up on health blogs in the blogosphere. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1514–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. McGowan BS, Wasko M, Vartabedian BS, Miller RS, Freiherr DD, Abdolrasulnia M. Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, Davies BJ, Averch TD, Woo HH, et al. Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association (AUA). BJU Int. 2014;113(6):993–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Cooper CP, Gelb CA, Rim SH, Hawkins NA, Rodriguez JL, Polonec L. Physicians who use social media and other internet-based communication technologies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):960–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1227–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Association AM, editor AMA Policy: professionalism in the use of social media. 2010. URL disponible en: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml (Fecha de acceso: 02 de agosto del 2011)[Links]; 2012.

  126. Boards FSM. Model policy guidelines for the appropriate use of social media and social networking in medical practice. J Med Regul. 2012;98:27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Pharmacists ASoH-S. ASHP statement on use of social media by pharmacy professionals: developed through the ASHP pharmacy student forum and the ASHP section of pharmacy informatics and technology and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on April 13, 2012, and by the ASHP House of Delegates on June 10, 2012. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(23):2095–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Gottlieb S. Health information on internet is often unreliable. BMJ. 2000;321(7254):136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Eysenbach G, Gray JM, Bonati M, Arunachalam S, Diepgen TL, Impicciatore P, et al. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of informationHallmarks for quality of informationQuality on the internetAssuring quality and relevance of internet information in the real world. BMJ. 1998;317(7171):1496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Viswanath K, Nagler R, Bigman-Galimore C, McCauley M, Jung M, Ramanadhan S. The communications revolution and health inequalities in the 21(st) century: implications for cancer control. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21(10):1701–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Tsai CC, Tsai SH, Zeng-Treitler Q, Liang BA, editors. Patient-centered consumer health social network websites: a pilot study of quality of user-generated health information. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings AMIA Symposium; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Stempel J, Finkle J. Yahoo says all three billion accounts hacked in 2013 data theft. REUTERS. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Paglier J. 2 million Facebook, Gmail and Twitter passwords stolen in massive hack CNN Money. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Rainie L. Americans’ complicated feelings about social media in an era of privacy concerns. 2018. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/.

  135. Choi NG, DiNitto DM. the digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Cresci MK, Yarandi HN, Morrell RW. The digital divide and urban older adults. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010;28(2):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Dean D, Webb C. Recovering from information overload. McKinsey Quarterly. 2011;1(1):80–8.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Arora NK, Hesse BW, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, Clayman ML, Croyle RT. Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Chan YM, Huang H. Weight management information overload challenges in 2007 HINTS: socioeconomic, health status and behaviors correlates. J Consum Health Internet. 2013;17(2):151–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Kim S. Content analysis of cancer blog posts. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(4):260–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Narimatsu H, Matsumura T, Morita T, Kishi Y, Yuji K, Kami M, et al. Detailed analysis of visitors to cancer-related web sites. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4219–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Elkin N. How America searches: health and wellness. January 2008. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A, Radovic A, Miller E, Colditz JB, et al. Association between social media use and depression among US young adults. Depress Anxiety. 2016;33(4):323–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Kross E, Verduyn P, Demiralp E, Park J, Lee DS, Lin N, et al. Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e69841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Bessière K, Pressman S, Kiesler S, Kraut R. Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Jelenchick LA, Eickhoff JC, Moreno MA. “Facebook depression?” Social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(1):128–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Sagioglou C, Greitemeyer T. Facebook’s emotional consequences: why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;35:359–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Hamm MP, Newton AS, Chisholm A, et al. Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: a scoping review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):770–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Blackshaw P. How do we know what’s advertising on YouTube. ConsumerGeneratedMedia.com. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Freeman B, Chapman S. Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tob Control. 2007;16(3):207–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Kaplan S. Big Tobacco’s global reach on social media. The New York Times. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Moreno MA, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Brito TE, Christakis DA. Display of health risk behaviors on myspace by adolescents: prevalence and associations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(1):27–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Malesky LA Jr. Predatory online behavior: modus operandi of convicted sex offenders in identifying potential victims and contacting minors over the Internet. J Child Sex Abus. 2007;16(2):23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Leventhal H, Ian B. The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour: Routledge; 2012. p. 56–79.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Cameron LD, Chan CK. Designing health communications: harnessing the power of affect, imagery, and self-regulation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(1):262–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Rus HM, Cameron LD. Health communication in social media: message features predicting user engagement on diabetes-related Facebook pages. Ann Behav Med. 2016;50(5):678–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Leventhal H, Phillips LA, Burns E. The common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):935–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Mora PA, McAndrew LM. Common-sense model of self-regulation. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. p. 460–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  160. Paddison C, Alpass F, Stephens C. Using the common sense model of illness self-regulation to understand diabetes-related distress: the importance of being able to ‘make sense’ of diabetes. N Z J Psychol. 2010;39(1):44–9.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Awasthi P, Mishra R. Illness beliefs and coping strategies of diabetic women. Psychol Stud. 2011;56(2):176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Barnes L, Moss-Morris R, Kaufusi M. Illness beliefs and adherence in diabetes mellitus: a comparison between Tongan and European patients. N Z Med J. 2004;117(1188):U743.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Weinstein ND, Lyon JE, Sandman PM, Cuite CL. Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing. Health Psychol. 1998;17(5):445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Redding C, Evers K. Chapter 5: the transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice: Wiley; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Rodgers A, Corbett T, Bramley D, Riddell T, Wills M, Lin R-B, et al. Do u smoke after txt? Results of a randomised trial of smoking cessation using mobile phone text messaging. Tob Control. 2005;14(4):255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Haug S, Schaub MP, Venzin V, Meyer C, John U. Efficacy of a text message-based smoking cessation intervention for young people: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Freimuth VS, Quinn SC. The contributions of health communication to eliminating health disparities: American Public Health Association; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  170. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: what is health communication? 2018. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/health-communication/facts.

  171. Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharm Ther. 2014;39(7):491–520.

    Google Scholar 

  172. ASHP statement on use of social media by pharmacy professionals: developed through the ASHP pharmacy student forum and the ASHP section of pharmacy informatics and technology and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on April 13, 2012, and by the ASHP House of Delegates on June 10, 2012. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(23):2095–7.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Childs LM, Martin CY. Social media profiles: striking the right balance. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(23):2044–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Fogelson NS, Rubin ZA, Ault KA. Beyond likes and tweets: an in-depth look at the physician social media landscape. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;56(3):495–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Peck JL. Social media in nursing education: responsible integration for meaningful use. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):164–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Jinhai Huo & Kea Turner

Authors
  1. Jinhai Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kea Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhai Huo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Jiang Bian

  2. Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Yi Guo

  3. School of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    Zhe He

  4. Computer Science and Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Xia Hu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huo, J., Turner, K. (2019). Social Media in Health Communication. In: Bian, J., Guo, Y., He, Z., Hu, X. (eds) Social Web and Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14714-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation