Skip to main content

Essence and Context: Process of Becoming and Dialectical Temporality in Adorno and Nono

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Of Essence and Context

Part of the book series: Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress ((NAHP,volume 7))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

Adorno emphasizes the processual nature of works of art, in contrast to the notions of essences as static formal structures. Essence and context of music can be configured in terms of Adorno’s understanding of dialectical temporality as the interweaving of subjective and objective dimensions of temporality. The central concepts of Adorno’s aesthetics (works of art as processes of becoming, the autonomy and social significance of music, and the fragmentary nature of truth) are at the foundation of Nono’s understanding of the essence of music as an “intervention in the sonic reality of our time” and are aligned with his exploration of musical material transcending the boundaries of tonality and atonality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is elaborated in Adorno’s criticism of Stravinsky:

    Stravinsky’s music remains a peripheral phenomenon […] because it avoids the dialectical confrontation with the musical progress of time. (Adorno 1973: 187)

  2. 2.

    The libretto is available at Fodazione Archivo Luigi Nono website: http://www.dicoseunpo.it/N_files/Prometeo.pdf [last checked 2 July 2018].

  3. 3.

    Phillips (2009) states that Nono shares Adorno’s thinking on historical consciousness in his lecture, “History and the Present in the Music of Today” (1959).

  4. 4.

    Quoted in Petazzi 2000.

  5. 5.

    Jürgen Vogt’s discussion of Adorno’s interpretation of Schoenberg is illuminating (Vogt 2014).

  6. 6.

    Ce n’est pas avec des idées qu’on fait des vers, c’est avec des mots (Maria Elisabeth Kronegger, Literary Impressionism, Rowman & Littlefield, 1973: 77).

  7. 7.

    I am indebted to Professor Richard Taruskin’s comments on clarifying Adorno’s views on autonomy and social dimensions of art.

  8. 8.

    Jarvis refers to Lukács’ theory of reification (Jarvis 1998: 9).

  9. 9.

    Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7: 138. Phillips has observed that:

    Adorno is […] less skeptical about utopian promise in his aesthetic theory. (Phillips 2009: 169)

  10. 10.

    Bürger has noted that Walter Benjamin upheld this concept of criticism (Bürger 1984: 40, 46). This positive view of the task of criticism is also sustained by Adorno as well as Ernst Bloch in Geist der Utopie (1918).

References

  • Abbado, Claudio. 1999. My Silent Friend: Remembering Luigi Nono. Contemporary Music Review 18 (1): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1960. Bloch’s Traces: The Philosophy of ‘Kitsch’. New Left Review 12 (May–June): 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1967. Prisms. Samuel and Shierry Weber (transl.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1973. Philosophy of Modern Music. London: Sheed and Ward. Also In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 12: Philosophie der neuen Musik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1974. Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. (1951), E.F.N. Jephcott (transl.). London: New Left Books, 1974. Also In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4. R. Tiedemann et al. (eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1977. Introduction to the Sociology of Music. E.B. Ashton (transl.). New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1982. On the Fetish-Character in Music and the Regression of Listening. In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, A. Arato and E. Gebhardt (eds.), 270–299. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1984. Aesthetic Theory. C. Lenhardt (transl.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1995. On Some Relationships Between Music and Painting. The Musical Quarterly 79 (1): 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 1998. The Philosophy of Music; Fragments and Texts, R. Tiedemann (ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.W. 2002. Late Style in Beethoven. In Essays on Music, 564–568. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W., Rolf Tiedemann, and Edmund Jephcott. 1998. Beethoven. The Philosophy of Music. Fragments and Texts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Ernst. 1986. The Principle of Hope, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, Peter. 1984. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Theory and History Literature, vol. 4. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covell, Grant Chu. 2004. Nono’s Shrug at Immortality: La lontananza nostalgica utopica futura. La Folia Musical Review. http://www.lafolia.com/nonos-shrug-at-immortality-la-lontananza-nostalgica-utopica-futura/. Last checked 4 July 2018.

  • Deliége, Célestin. 2003. Cinquante ans de modernité musicale: de Darmstadt à l’IRCAM, Contribution historiographique à une musicologie critique. Bruxelles: Editions Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, Stefan. 1998. Architektur und Fragment. Studien zu späten Kompositionen Luigi Nonos. Saarbrücken: Pfau-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, Stefan. 2001. Liner notes to Luigi Nono—Clemens Merkel/Wolfgang Heiniger—La Lontananza Nostalgica Utopica Futura, CD, Edition Wandelweiser Records, EWR 0102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddins, Stephen. 1988. All Music Review. http://www.allmusic.com/album/luigi-nono-como-una-ola-de-fuerza-y-luz-sofferte-onde-serene-contrappunto-dialettico-alla-mente-mw0001849487. Last checked 4 July 2018.

  • Feneyrou, Laurent. 1993. Luigi Nono: Prometeo, Tragedia dell’ascolto. Genesis 4: 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamm, Christoph. 1995. Preface. In II canto Sospeso (score), Luigi Nono (ed.), iii–x. London: Eulenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondazione Renzo Piano. 1985. Spazio musicale per l’opera prima ‘Prometeo’ [Prometeo Musical Space]. http://www.fondazionerenzopiano.org/en/project/spazio-musicale-per-lopera-prima-prometeo/. Last checked 4 July 2018.

  • Guerrero, Jeannie Ma. 2006. Serial Intervention in Nono’s Sospeso. Music Theory Online 12 (1). http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.06.12.1/mto.06.12.1.guerrero_frames.html. Last checked 4 July 2018.

  • Hall, Mirko M. 2010. Dialectical Sonority: Walter Benjamin’s Acoustics of Profane Illumination. Telos 152 (Fall): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 2013. The Fleeting Promise of Art: Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory Revisited. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hulat, Owen. 2016. Adorno’s Theory of Philosophical and Aesthetic Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iddon, Martin. 2013. New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, Jonathan. 2004. The tragedy of listening—Nono, Cacciari, Critical Thought and Compositional Practice. Radical Philosophy 125: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Simon. 1998. Adorno: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1968. The Monadology. Robert Latta (transl.). Oxford University Press. Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen. 2015. Kritische Theorie der Musik. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen (ed.). 2006. Critical Composition Today. Hofheim: Wolke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen, F. Cox, and W. Schurig (eds.). 2006. New Music and Aesthetics in the 21st Century, Vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nono, Luigi. 1975. Texte, Studien zu seiner Musik, J. Stenzl (ed.). Zürich: Atlantis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nono, Luigi. 1993. Ecrits. L. Feneyrou (transl.). Paris: Christian Bourgois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nono, Luigi. 2001. Lo Sviluppo della Tecnica Seriale [The Development of Serial Technique]. In Scritti e Colloqui, 19–42, Luigi Nono, Angela Ida de Benedictis, and Veniero Rizzardi (eds.), Milan: Ricordi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nono, Luigi, and M. Cacciari. 1984. Verso Prometeo. Venice: Ricordi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddison, Max. 1997. Adorno’s Aesthetics of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petazzi, Paolo. 2000. Luigi Nono e il suono elettronico. 10° Festival di Milano Musica, Teatro, Studio, 9 Oct 2000. http://warszawska-jesien.art.pl/en/wj2012/program/work/429619844. Last checked 4 July 2018.

  • Phillips, Wesley. 2009. Waiting in Vain? Metaphysics, Modernity and Music in the Work of T.W. Adorno, Martin Heidegger and Luigi Nono. Ph.D. dissertation, Middlesex University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piano, Renzo. 1985. Il Prometeo. Daidalos, 1 Sept 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, Friedemann. 2000. Le paradoxe postmoderne et l’oeuvre tardive de Luigi Nono. Circuit: musiques contemporaines 11 (1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Sasse, Jochen. 1984. Foreword: Theory of Modernism Versus Theory of the Avant-Garde. In Theory of the Avant-Garde, vol. 4, vii–xIvii, Peter Bürger (ed.). Theory and History Literature. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzl, Jürg. 2013. Werkverzeichnis Bibliographie seiner Schriften und der Sekundärliteratur Diskographie Filmographie Bandarchiv. 3. Auflage Salzburg/Wien 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira de Carvalho, Mário. 1999a. Towards Dialectical Listening: Quotation and Montage in the Work of Luigi Nono. Contemporary Music Review 18 (2): 37–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira de Carvalho, Mário. 1999b. New Music Between Search for Identity and Autopoiesis: Or, the ‘Tragedy of Listening’. Theory, Culture & Society 16 (4): 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Jürgen. 2014. Drei Studien: Kants Ekel, Adornos Idiosynkrasie, Nietzsches Ressentiment. Zeitschrift für Kritische Musikpädagogik 29: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer, Albrecht. 1991. The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidervaart, Lambert. 1991. Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Höchsmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Höchsmann, H. (2019). Essence and Context: Process of Becoming and Dialectical Temporality in Adorno and Nono. In: Stanevičiūtė, R., Zangwill, N., Povilionienė, R. (eds) Of Essence and Context. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14471-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics