Abstract
This chapter presents a multi-portfolio approach for the time and space integrated decision-making in a supply chain under disruption risks. In the context of supply chain disruptions, the portfolio is defined as the allocation of demand for parts among suppliers or the allocation of demand for products among production facilities. A disruptive event is assumed to impact both primary suppliers of parts and the firm primary assembly plant. Then, the firm selects recovery suppliers, recovery plants along with transshipment of parts from disabled primary plant to recovery plants and production and inventory planning in recovery plants. The mitigation and recovery decisions are integrated over time and space: the primary portfolios to be implemented before a disruptive event are optimized simultaneously with recovery portfolios for the aftermath period as well as the portfolios for both part suppliers and product manufacturers in different geographic regions are determined simultaneously. Using conditional cost at risk and conditional service at risk as risk measures, the risk-averse solutions are obtained. The solution results are compared for different demand patterns. The findings indicate that when the objective is to optimize service level with no regard to costs, both supply and demand portfolios are more diversified. The findings also demonstrate that the developed multi-portfolio approach leads to computationally efficient stochastic MIP models with a very strong LP relaxation. The proposed multi-portfolio approach that allows for the time and space integrated decision-making may help to better mitigate the impact of disruption propagation on supply chain performance, i.e., the ripple effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basole, R., & Bellamy, M. (2014). Supply network structure, visibility, and risk diffusion: A computational approach. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 753–789.
Birge, J. R., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. New York: Springer.
Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K. S., & Craighead, C. W. (2011). An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374–391.
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 414–430.
Ivanov, D. (2018). Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management. New York: Springer.
Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2014a). The ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘Efficiency-Flexibility-Resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172.
Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Pavlov, A. (2014b). Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2), 758–770.
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., & Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158–6174.
Liberatore, F., Scaparra, M. P., & Daskin, M. S. (2012). Hedging against disruptions with ripple effects in location analysis. Omega, 40(1), 21–30.
MacKenzie, C. A., Barker, K., & Santos, J. R. (2014). Modeling a severe supply chain disruption and post-disaster decision making with application to the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. IIE Transactions, 46(12), 1243–1260.
Marszewska, J. R. (2016). Implications of seismic hazard in Japan on Toyota supply chain disruption risks. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Industrial Logistics, Zakopane, Poland (pp. 178–185).
Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota’s coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 217–227.
Meena, P. L., Sarmah, S. P., & Sarkar, A. (2014). Sourcing decisions under risks of catastrophic event disruptions. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 1058–1074.
Namdar, J., Li, X., Sawhney, R., & Pradhan, N. (2018). Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(6), 2339–2360.
Park, Y., Hong, P., & Roh, J. J. (2013). Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business Horizon, 56(1), 75–85.
Ruiz-Torres, A. J., Mahmoodi, F., & Zeng, A. Z. (2013). Supplier selection model with contingency planning for supplier failures. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 374–382.
Rajagopal, V., Venkatesan, S. P., & Goh, M. (2017). Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 646–682.
Sawik, T. (2011a). Scheduling in supply chains using mixed integer programming. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sawik, T. (2011b). Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 39, 194–208.
Sawik, T. (2011c). Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio in make-to-order environment with risks. Computers and Operations Research, 38(4), 782–796.
Sawik, T. (2013a). Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega, 41, 259–269.
Sawik, T. (2013b). Integrated selection of suppliers and scheduling of customer orders in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23–24), 7006–7022.
Sawik, T. (2014). Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing. Omega, 43(2), 83–95.
Sawik, T. (2015). Integrated supply chain scheduling under multi-level disruptions. IFAC-Papers On Line, 48(3), 1515–1520.
Sawik, T. (2016). Integrated supply, production and distribution scheduling under disruption risks. Omega, 62, 131–144.
Sawik, T. (2017). A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), 1970–1991.
Sawik, T. (2018a). Supply chain disruption management using stochastic mixed integer programming. New York: Springer.
Sawik, T. (2018b). Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio under delay and disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 760–782.
Sawik, T. (2018c). Two-period vs. multi-period model for supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1504246. Article in press.
Sawik, T. (2019). Disruption mitigation and recovery in supply chains using portfolio approach. Omega, 84, 232–248.
Scheibe, K. P., & Blackhurst, J. (2018). Supply chain disruption propagation: A systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 43–59.
Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., Wei, Y., Zhang, P. J., Combs, K., Ge, Y., et al. (2015). Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain. Interfaces, 45(5), 375–390.
Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016). OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: A review. IIE Transactions, 48(2), 89–109.
Torabi, S. A., Baghersad, M., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transportation Research Part E, 79, 22–48.
Yoon, J., Talluri, S., Yildiz, H., & Ho, W. (2018). Models for supplier selection and risk mitigation: A holistic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3636–3661.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank the editors for their invitation to contribute to this handbook.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sawik, T. (2019). A Multi-portfolio Approach to Integrated Risk-Averse Planning in Supply Chains Under Disruption Risks. In: Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14301-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14302-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)