Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Focus Theory of Normative Conduct

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Psychology in Action

Abstract

In this chapter, the Focus Theory of Normative Conduct is discussed. This theory posits that social norms provide people with decisional shortcuts of how to behave in certain situations, either because it is typical or normal (descriptive social norms) or because it is appropriate or desired (injunctive social norms). This theory further specifies that any given social norm will only influence behavior when it is activated at the moment of the behavioral decision, that is, when that specific norm is made salient or when an individual’s attention is focused on that specific norm while choosing their path of action (normative focus). Depending on the specific context, both descriptive and injunctive social norms may be effective in engendering behavioral change. Effectiveness of social norm interventions has been shown to depend on whether people have the resources to attend to the social norm in question to the extent that it becomes focal in guiding their behavior and on whether people can identify with the social norm group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1773–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Group leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 63–108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, A., & Sagarin, E. (1976). Norms and human behavior. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., & Schlüter, L. E. (2014). A room with a viewpoint revisited: Descriptive norms and hotel guests’ towel reuse behavior. PLoS One, 9, e104086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Parrott, D. J., Swan, S. C., Kuchynka, S. L., & Schramm, A. T. (2015). A dangerous boomerang: Injunctive norms, hostile sexist attitudes, and male-to-female sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 580–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: social marketing and the ‘social norm approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campo, S., & Cameron, K. A. (2006). Differential effects of exposure to social norms campaigns: A cause for concern. Health Communication, 19, 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, R., Schimmack, U., Williams, D. R., & Bürkner, P. C. (2017). Bayes factors from pooled data are no substitute for Bayesian meta-analysis: Commentary on Scheibehenne, Jamil, and Wagenmakers (2016). Psychological Science, 28, 1694–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (1988). Influence: Science and practice (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. D., Lange, J. E., Russell, C., Shillington, A., & Voas, R. B. (2003). A failed norms social marketing campaign. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1970). Norms and normative behavior: Field studies of social interdependence. In J. Macaulay & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 83–102). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder, D. T. D., De Vet, E., Stok, F. M., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2013). Obesity, overconsumption and self-regulation failure: The unsung role of eating appropriateness standards. Health Psychology Review, 7, 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granfield, R. (2005). Alcohol use in college: Limitations on the transformation of social norms. Addiction Research & Theory, 13, 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. D., & Enzle, M. E. (1981). A cognitive model of social norms for understanding the transgression-helping effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 866–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., Jacobson, K. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2015). Self-control moderates the effectiveness of influence attempts highlighting injunctive social norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 718–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. L., & White, K. M. (2003). Binge-drinking: A test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology and Health, 18, 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kredentser, M. S., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Fulton, K. (2012). Following what people think we should do versus what people actually do: Elaboration as a moderator of the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Bergin-Seers, S. (2010). The effect of interventions on the environmental behaviour of Australian motel guests. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, M. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 649–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M. (1984). Age and sequencing norms in the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 63, 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, C. R., Neel, R., Cialdini, R. B., Jaeger, C. M., Jacobson, R. P., & Ringel, M. M. (in press). Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisa, C., Varum, C., & Botelho, A. (2017). Promoting Sustainable Hotel Guest Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58, 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, G., Loew, K., & Steffgen, G. (2014). A towel less: Social norms enhance pro-environmental behavior in hotels. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13, 184–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, S. J., Fennis, B. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Vet, E. (2014). Health on impulse: When low self-control promotes healthy food choices. Health Psychology, 33, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibehenne, B., Jamil, T., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Bayesian evidence synthesis can reconcile seemingly inconsistent results: The case of hotel towel reuse. Psychological Science, 27, 1043–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W. P., Khazian, A. M., & Zaleski, A. C. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverding, M., Decker, S., & Zimmermann, F. (2010). Information about low participation in cancer screening demotivates other people. Psychological Science, 21, 941–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., De Vet, E., & De Wit, J. B. (2012). Minority talks: The influence of descriptive social norms on fruit intake. Psychology & Health, 27, 956–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., De Vet, E., & De Wit, J. B. (2014). Don’t tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., De Vet, E., De Wit, J. B., Renner, B., & De Ridder, D. T. (2015). Communicating eating-related rules. Suggestions are more effective than restrictions. Appetite, 86, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96, 903–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrier, L., & Marfaing, B. (2015). Using social norms and commitment to promote pro-environmental behavior among hotel guests. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H., & Klofas, J. (1984). Pluralistic ignorance, revisited. In G. M. Stephenson & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., Perkins, H. W., & Bauerle, J. (2008). Declining negative consequences related to alcohol misuse among students exposed to a social norms marketing intervention on a college campus. Journal of American College Health, 57, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues on research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, B., & Sobal, J. (2007). Mindless eating: The 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior, 39, 106–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1961). The self concept. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, D., & Silk, K. J. (2011). Social norms, self-identity, and attention to social comparison information in the context of exercise and healthy diet behavior. Health Communication, 26, 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziller, R. C., Hagey, J., Smith, M., & Long, B. H. (1969). Self-esteem: a self-social construct. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    F. Marijn Stok & Denise T. D. de Ridder

Authors
  1. F. Marijn Stok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denise T. D. de Ridder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise T. D. de Ridder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien/Knowledge Research Center and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Kai Sassenberg

  2. Department of Psychology, Social Psychology program group, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Michael L. W. Vliek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stok, F.M., de Ridder, D.T.D. (2019). The Focus Theory of Normative Conduct. In: Sassenberg, K., Vliek, M.L.W. (eds) Social Psychology in Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation