Abstract
Negotiating the UK’s future security and defence relationship with the EU was never going to be easy, but many argued it would at least be simpler than in other areas. Yet the negotiations have proven more protracted than might have been expected. This chapter examines why this has been the case. Our argument is structured around the five main reasons given as to why security and defence would be an easier domain in which to reach agreement. Not only have a number of aspects relating to Britain’s role in European security been misrepresented, we argue, but also the basis for these arguments in the first place have been changed by the direct and indirect consequences of the Brexit vote itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Former MP and prominent Leave supporter Julian Brazier made this remark in a public lecture in Canterbury in 2016 and the claim has been reiterated by a number of key Brexiteers.
References
Bakker, A., Drent, M., & Zandee, D. (2017, July). European defence: How to engage the UK after Brexit? Clingendael Report. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2017-07/Report_European_defence_after_Brexit.pdf
Balfour, R. (Ed.). (2016). Europe’s troublemakers: The populist challenge to foreign policy. Brussels: European Policy Centre.
Barnier, M. (2017, November). Speech by Michel Barnier at the Berlin security conference, Berlin. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-17-5021_en.pdf
Barnier, M. (2018, May). Speech by Michel Barnier at the EU institute for security studies conference, Brussels. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-18-3785_en.pdf
Besch, S., Bond, I., & Mortera-Martinez, C. (2018, June). Plugging in the British: Completing the circuit. Centre for European Reform. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/report_pluggingin_12.6.18_1.pdf
Biscop, S. (2016). All or nothing? The EU global strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 431–445.
Black, J., Hall, A., Cox, K., Kepe, M., & Silfversen, E. (2017). Defence and security after Brexit: Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
Bond, I. (2018, November). Is Trump right to nuke the INF treaty? Centre for European Reform Insight. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_IB_2.11.18_2.pdf
Chryssogelos, A. (2015). Patterns of transnational partisan contestation of European foreign policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 20(2), 227–246.
Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of the EU. (2016, November 14). Implementation plan on security and defence. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf
Council of the EU. (2017). Council decision 2017/2315 of 11 December establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and determining the list of participating member states. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017D2315&from=EN
Cox, M. (2012). Too big to fail? The transatlantic relationship from Bush to Obama. Global Policy, 3(1), 71–78.
Curtin, D. (2018). The ties that bind: Securing information-sharing after Brexit. In B. Martill & U. Staiger (Eds.), Brexit and beyond: Rethinking the futures of Europe (pp. 148–155). London: UCL Press.
Dennison, J., & Oliver, T. (2018, April 20). Brexit and NATO: Never the twain shall meet? Dahrendorf Forum Blog. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/brexit-nato-eu-defence/
Dennison, S., & Pardijs, D. (2016). The world according to Europe’s insurgent parties: Putin, migration and people power. Brussels: European Council on Foreign Relations.
Dijkstra, H. (2012). Agenda-setting in the common security and defence policy: An institutionalist perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(4), 454–472.
Dombrowski, P., & Reich, S. (2017). Does Donald Trump have a grand strategy? International Affairs, 93(5), 1013–1037.
Dunn, D. H., & Webber, M. (2016). The UK, the European Union and NATO: Brexit’s unintended consequences. Global Affairs, 2(5), 471–480.
Dwan, R. (2000). Jean Monnet and the European defence community, 1950-54. Cold War History, 1(1), 141–160.
European Commission. (2016). Towards a European defence union: Permanent structured cooperation and the European defence fund. European Commission. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/defence-union_en.pdf
European Commission. (2018a, June 13). EU budget: Stepping up the EU’s role as a security and defence provider. European Commission. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4121_en.htm
European Commission. (2018b, November 14). Outline of the political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom. European Commission. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/outline_of_the_political_declaration.pdf
European Commission. (2018c, May 2). EU budget: Commission proposes a modern budget for a union that protects, empowers and defends. European Commission. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3570_en.htm
European External Action Service. (2018, November 19). Factsheet: The military planning and conduct capability. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/54031/factsheet-military-planning-and-conduct-capability_en
European Parliament. (2018, May 2018). CSDP after Brexit: The way forward. Study prepared by the DG for External Policies of the European Parliament’s Policy Department.
Giegerich, B., & Mölling, C. (2018, February 18). The United Kingdom’s contribution to European security and defence. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies Report.
Hadfield, A. (2018). Britain against the world? Foreign and security policy in the ‘age of Brexit’. In B. Martill & U. Staiger (Eds.), Brexit and beyond: Rethinking the futures of Europe (pp. 174–182). London: UCL Press.
Heisbourg, F. (2016). Brexit and European security. Survival, 58(3), 13–22.
Hill, C. (2018). Turning back the clock: The illusion of a global political role for Britain. In B. Martill & U. Staiger (Eds.), Brexit and beyond: Rethinking the futures of Europe (pp. 183–192). London: UCL Press.
Hix, S. (2018). Brexit: Where is the EU-UK relationship heading? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(S1), 11–27.
HM Government. (2017). Foreign policy, defence and development: A future partnership paper. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
HM Government. (2018). Framework for the UK-EU security partnership. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Hofmann, S. C. (2018, October) Brexit will weigh heavily on European security. Here’s why. Washington Post. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/10/18/brexit-will-weigh-heavily-on-european-security-heres-why/?utm_term=.e432ed471192
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
House of Commons. (2018). Global Britain: Sixth report of session 2017–19. Report of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. London: House of Commons Printing Office.
Howorth, J. (2012). Decision-making in security and defence policy: Towards supranational intergovernmentalism. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(4), 433–453.
Hyde-Price, A. G. V. (2015). The “sleep-walking giant” awakes: Resetting German foreign and security policy. European Security, 24(4), 600–616.
Juncker, J. C (2017, September). State of the union 2017, 13.
Kahn, L. (2018, July 11). Putin’s cheerleaders: Why the Russian leader’s growing support in Europe makes a worrying amount of sense. Dahrendorf Forum Blog. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/putins-cheerleaders-why-the-russian-leaders-growing-support-in-europe-makes-a-worrying-amount-of-sense/
Keating, D. (2015, September 3). Juncker calls for an EU army. European Voice.
Keohane, D. (2018, March 22). EU-NATO alignment after Brexit. Carnegie Europe. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/75861
Major, C., & Mölling, C. (2017). France moves from EU defence to European defence. Carnegie Europe Briefing. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/74944
Major, C., & von Ondarza, N. (2018, June). No “Global Britain” after Brexit. SWP Comment, No 24.
Martill, B. (2017, November 8). Brexit and UK foreign policy: ‘Keeping Britain Great’ or ‘Putting the Great back into Great Britain’? Dahrendorf Forum Blog. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/brexit-and-uk-foreign-policy-keeping-britain-great-or-putting-the-great-back-into-great-britain/
Martill, B., & Staiger, U. (2018, September 14) Cultures of negotiation: Explaining Britain’s hard bargaining in the Brexit negotiations. Dahrendorf Forum Working Paper. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://www.dahrendorf-forum.eu/publications/cultures-of-negotiation-explaining-britains-hard-bargaining-in-the-brexit-negotiations/
Menon, A. (2011). Power, institutions and the CSDP: The promise of institutionalist theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(1), 83–100.
Merkel, A. (2018). Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Merkel vor dem Europäischen Parlament am 13. November 2018 in Straßburg. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/aktuelles/rede-von-bundeskanzlerin-merkel-vor-dem-europaeischen-parlament-am-13-november-2018-in-strassburg-1549538
Ruane, K. (2000). The rise and fall of the European defence community: Anglo-American relations and the crisis of European defence, 1950–55. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schofield, K. (2017, September 29). Theresa May: I want a ‘bold, new security partnership with the EU’ after Brexit. PoliticsHome. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/news/89391/theresa-may-i-want-bold-new-security-partnership-eu-after
Sternberg, C. S. (2013). The struggle for EU legitimacy: Public contestation, 1950–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sus, M. (2017). Towards the European Union’s foreign policy 2025: Taking stock of the Dahrendorf Foresight project. Global Policy, 8(4), 115–125.
Tardy, T. (2018). What third-country role is open to the UK in defence? CEPS Policy Briefing. Accessed April 24, 2018, from https://www.ceps.eu/publications/what-third-country-role-open-uk-defence
The Economist. (2018, June 7). A Brexit row over Galileo could damage broader co-operation on defence. The Economist online. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/06/07/a-brexit-row-over-galileo-could-damage-broader-co-operation-on-defence
The Express. (2018a, July 10). UK could be DRAGGED into EU ARMY – even AFTER Brexit. The Express. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/986828/uk-eu-army-brexit-news-france-germany
The Express. (2018b, March 16). Rees-Mogg demands inquiry over civil servants ‘hoodwinking’ voters with ‘KitKat’ Brexit. The Express. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/932731/Brexit-latest-news-Jacob-Rees-Mogg-civil-servants-kitkat-tapes
The Sun. (2018, March 15). Bombshell tapes reveal how top Whitehall officials compared Brexit to a KitKat with chocolate layer hiding UK ties to Brussels. The Sun. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5822727/whitehall-brexit-brussels-secret-tapes/
Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European security and defence union: Was 2017 a watershed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(S1), 131–141.
Tocci, N., & Alcaro, R. (2014). Rethinking transatlantic relations in a multipolar era. International Politics, 51(3), 366–389.
Tolhurst, A. (2017, September 14). Jacob Rees-Mogg destroys Jean-Claude Juncker’s ‘nightmare’ plan for an EU super state as he blasts Brussels’ demand for a Brexit ‘divorce bill’. The Sun. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4463323/jacob-rees-mogg-destroys-jean-claude-junckers-nightmare-plan-for-an-eu-super-state-as-he-blasts-brussels-demand-for-a-brexit-divorce-bill/
Turpin, L. (2018, August). The future of UK-EU defence cooperation post-Brexit: A neoclassical realist approach. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Hamburg. Accessed December 6, 2018, from https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/8036257f-7807-43aa-9ab8-497c18d34f41.pdf
Veterans for Britain. (2018, June 25). Did you know there are serious risks arising from UK involvement in EU defence union? Veterans for Britain Leaflet. Accessed December 6, 2018, from http://veteransforbritain.uk/risksleaflet/
Whitman, R. (2016). The UK and EU foreign and security policy: An optional extra. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 254–261.
Zaborowski, M. (2018, January). Poland and European defence integration. ECFR Policy Brief.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sus, M., Martill, B. (2019). Channel Trouble? Challenges to UK-EU Security Collaboration After Brexit. In: Baciu, CA., Doyle, J. (eds) Peace, Security and Defence Cooperation in Post-Brexit Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12418-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12418-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12417-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12418-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)