Skip to main content

Launching Semi-automated Modal Identification of the Port Mann Bridge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2

Abstract

Southwest British Columbia (B.C.) is home to many of the largest bridges in North America, and the majority of its lifeline bridges are cable-stayed. It is also one of the most active seismic zones in Canada and the world. To help face the obvious challenges that this poses for structural engineers, the Ministry of Transportation embarked on a province-wide monitoring program in 2009, called the B.C. Smart Infrastructure Monitoring System (BCSIMS). It combines the vibration data from an urban strong motion network and a structural health monitoring network, and pursues two objectives: (a) to enable an efficient emergency response by implementing a post-earthquake damage assessment module, and (b) to install a long-term monitoring module for cost-effective operation over the entire lifespan of structures. This paper contributes to the post-earthquake damage assessment module and focuses on the modal identification of the Port Mann Bridge using the stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method. Moreover, a hierarchical clustering approach is used to automatically select stable modes of vibration. The envisaged damage assessment module is based on subspace-based methods, and the modal parameter estimation is merely a side product of the ongoing studies. Nonetheless, it is an integral part of every structural health monitoring network and allows first insights into the influence of environmental/operational variables on the dynamic behaviour of the bridge when, for example, combined with regression analysis. No bridge weigh-in-motion system is installed, but a strong correlation can be found between a traffic index estimated from toll cameras and the fluctuation of modal frequencies. This highlights the dominant effect of traffic loads over other environmental variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    BCSIMS homepage: www.bcsims.ca.

  2. 2.

    The relation between the covariance and correlation functions writes cor(y, y) = Cov(y, y)/(σ yσ y).

  3. 3.

    Target values have been created in ARTeMIS [17].

References

  1. Goldfinger, C., Nelson, C.H., Morey, A.E., et al.: Turbidite event history—methods and implications for Holocene Paleoseismicity of the Cascadia Subduction Zone. US Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, Paper 1661–F (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaya, Y., Ventura, C., Huffman, S., et al.: British Columbia smart infrastructure monitoring system. Can. J. Civil Eng. 44(8), 579–588 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. Wiley, Oxford (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B.: A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock. Vib. Digest. 30(2), 91–105 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Straser, E.G., et al.: Variability of modal parameters measured on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. In: Proceedings of the IMAC—15th International Modal Analysis Conference (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (S6-14) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Almeida Cardoso, R., Cury, A., Barbosa, F.: A clustering-based strategy for automated structural modal identification. Struct. Health Monitor. 17(2), 201--217 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Overschee, P., de Moor, B.: Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory-Implementation-Application. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Peeters, B.: System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brincker, R., Ventura, C.E. (eds.): Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis. Wiley, New York (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., de Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G.: Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures. Springer, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarpø, M., Olsen, P., Amador, S., et al.: On minimizing the influence of the noise tail of correlation functions in operational modal analysis. Proc. Eng. 199, 1038–1043 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richard, S.P., Elliott, K.B., Axel, S.: A consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. J. Guid. Contr. Dynam. 16(5), 852–858 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verboven, P., Parloo, P., Guillaume, P., et al.: Autonomous structural health monitoring-part I: modal parameter estimation and tracking. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16(4), 637–657 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald, S.: Operational modal analysis, model updating, and seismic analysis of a cable-stayed bridge. Master thesis, University of British Columbia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Structural Vibration Solutions A/S, ARTeMIS Modal, Denmark (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaya, Y., Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E.: Structural health monitoring network in British Columbia, Canada. In: Proceedings of the EWSWH—9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cross, E.J.: On SHM in changing environmental and operational conditions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E., Allahdadian, S.: The Yellow frame: experimental studies and remote monitoring of the structural health monitoring benchmark structure. In: Proceedings of the IMAC—36th International Modal Analysis Conference, vol. 2, pp. 233–244 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the Canadian Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mendler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E., Nandimandalam, L., Kaya, Y. (2020). Launching Semi-automated Modal Identification of the Port Mann Bridge. In: Pakzad, S. (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12115-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12115-0_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12114-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12115-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics