Abstract
Southwest British Columbia (B.C.) is home to many of the largest bridges in North America, and the majority of its lifeline bridges are cable-stayed. It is also one of the most active seismic zones in Canada and the world. To help face the obvious challenges that this poses for structural engineers, the Ministry of Transportation embarked on a province-wide monitoring program in 2009, called the B.C. Smart Infrastructure Monitoring System (BCSIMS). It combines the vibration data from an urban strong motion network and a structural health monitoring network, and pursues two objectives: (a) to enable an efficient emergency response by implementing a post-earthquake damage assessment module, and (b) to install a long-term monitoring module for cost-effective operation over the entire lifespan of structures. This paper contributes to the post-earthquake damage assessment module and focuses on the modal identification of the Port Mann Bridge using the stochastic subspace identification (SSI) method. Moreover, a hierarchical clustering approach is used to automatically select stable modes of vibration. The envisaged damage assessment module is based on subspace-based methods, and the modal parameter estimation is merely a side product of the ongoing studies. Nonetheless, it is an integral part of every structural health monitoring network and allows first insights into the influence of environmental/operational variables on the dynamic behaviour of the bridge when, for example, combined with regression analysis. No bridge weigh-in-motion system is installed, but a strong correlation can be found between a traffic index estimated from toll cameras and the fluctuation of modal frequencies. This highlights the dominant effect of traffic loads over other environmental variables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
BCSIMS homepage: www.bcsims.ca.
- 2.
The relation between the covariance and correlation functions writes cor(y, y) = Cov(y, y)/(σ yσ y).
- 3.
Target values have been created in ARTeMIS [17].
References
Goldfinger, C., Nelson, C.H., Morey, A.E., et al.: Turbidite event history—methods and implications for Holocene Paleoseismicity of the Cascadia Subduction Zone. US Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, Paper 1661–F (2012)
Kaya, Y., Ventura, C., Huffman, S., et al.: British Columbia smart infrastructure monitoring system. Can. J. Civil Eng. 44(8), 579–588 (2017)
Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. Wiley, Oxford (2012)
Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B.: A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock. Vib. Digest. 30(2), 91–105 (1998)
Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W., Straser, E.G., et al.: Variability of modal parameters measured on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. In: Proceedings of the IMAC—15th International Modal Analysis Conference (1997)
Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (S6-14) (2014)
de Almeida Cardoso, R., Cury, A., Barbosa, F.: A clustering-based strategy for automated structural modal identification. Struct. Health Monitor. 17(2), 201--217 (2017)
van Overschee, P., de Moor, B.: Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory-Implementation-Application. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Peeters, B.: System identification and damage detection in civil engineering. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2000)
Brincker, R., Ventura, C.E. (eds.): Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis. Wiley, New York (2015)
Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., de Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)
Rainieri, C., Fabbrocino, G.: Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures. Springer, New York (2014)
Tarpø, M., Olsen, P., Amador, S., et al.: On minimizing the influence of the noise tail of correlation functions in operational modal analysis. Proc. Eng. 199, 1038–1043 (2017)
Richard, S.P., Elliott, K.B., Axel, S.: A consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. J. Guid. Contr. Dynam. 16(5), 852–858 (1993)
Verboven, P., Parloo, P., Guillaume, P., et al.: Autonomous structural health monitoring-part I: modal parameter estimation and tracking. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16(4), 637–657 (2002)
McDonald, S.: Operational modal analysis, model updating, and seismic analysis of a cable-stayed bridge. Master thesis, University of British Columbia (2016)
Structural Vibration Solutions A/S, ARTeMIS Modal, Denmark (2015)
Kaya, Y., Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E.: Structural health monitoring network in British Columbia, Canada. In: Proceedings of the EWSWH—9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2018)
Cross, E.J.: On SHM in changing environmental and operational conditions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield (2012)
Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E., Allahdadian, S.: The Yellow frame: experimental studies and remote monitoring of the structural health monitoring benchmark structure. In: Proceedings of the IMAC—36th International Modal Analysis Conference, vol. 2, pp. 233–244 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The financial support from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the Canadian Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mendler, A., Ventura, C.E., Nandimandalam, L., Kaya, Y. (2020). Launching Semi-automated Modal Identification of the Port Mann Bridge. In: Pakzad, S. (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12115-0_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12115-0_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12114-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12115-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)