Abstract
Functional and oncological outcome after multimodal treatment for rectal cancer could be improved. This can be achieved with a better recognition of anatomical dissection planes, of anatomical landmarks, and of the dissection margin to the tumor to optimize resection margins and to minimize iatrogenic nerve damage. Recently, the performance of stereotactic navigation for minimally invasive transanal rectal surgery has been reported. Additionally, critical challenges related to soft-tissue stereotactic pelvic navigation were assessed. Surgical navigation systems could improve the quality of surgery for rectal cancer as shown when used in other contexts. It is likely to improve the accuracy and efficiency of pelvic surgical procedures in which it is difficult or impossible to identify and dissect along anatomical planes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S. Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(11):679–84.
Atallah S, Nassif G, Larach S. Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME: opening the gateway to frameless, image-guided abdominal and pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):207–11.
Wijsmuller AR, et al. Advances in stereotactic navigation for pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(6):2713–20.
Lange MM, et al. Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment is mainly caused by surgery. Br J Surg. 2008;95(8):1020–8.
Lange MM, et al. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(9):1578–88.
Wallner C, et al. Causes of fecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(27):4466–72.
van der Pas MH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8.
Guillou PJ, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–26.
Kang SB, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637–45.
Fleshman J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–55.
Stevenson AR, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–63.
Deijen CL, et al. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3210–5.
Buchs NC, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: a valid option for rectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(41):11700–8.
Rouanet P, et al. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(4):408–15.
Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M. Navigation in surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398(4):501–14.
Wadley J, et al. Pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance in modern neurosurgery: a review of 300 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):217–25.
Kawada K, et al. Stereotactic navigation during laparoscopic surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(12):977–8.
Atallah S, Tilahun Y, Monson JR. Real-time stereotactic navigation for the laparoscopic excision of a pelvic neoplasm. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(8):599–600.
Wijsmuller AR, et al. A step towards stereotactic navigation during pelvic surgery: 3D nerve topography. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3582.
Guerriero L, et al. Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(6):719–23.
Franchini Melani AG, Diana M, Marescaux J. The quest for precision in transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1405-3. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
Atallah S. The dawn of the digital operating theatre and the rise of the digital surgeon. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(9):499–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1325-2. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank Bernard Dallemagne for his guidance during the projects leading up to this chapter. We also thank Guy Temporal and Chris Burel for their editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romagnolo, L.G.C., Wijsmuller, A.R., Melani, A.G.F. (2019). Navigation for Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. In: Atallah, S. (eds) Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11571-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11572-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)