Skip to main content

Abstract

Functional and oncological outcome after multimodal treatment for rectal cancer could be improved. This can be achieved with a better recognition of anatomical dissection planes, of anatomical landmarks, and of the dissection margin to the tumor to optimize resection margins and to minimize iatrogenic nerve damage. Recently, the performance of stereotactic navigation for minimally invasive transanal rectal surgery has been reported. Additionally, critical challenges related to soft-tissue stereotactic pelvic navigation were assessed. Surgical navigation systems could improve the quality of surgery for rectal cancer as shown when used in other contexts. It is likely to improve the accuracy and efficiency of pelvic surgical procedures in which it is difficult or impossible to identify and dissect along anatomical planes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Larach S. Image-guided real-time navigation for transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(11):679–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atallah S, Nassif G, Larach S. Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME: opening the gateway to frameless, image-guided abdominal and pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wijsmuller AR, et al. Advances in stereotactic navigation for pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(6):2713–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lange MM, et al. Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment is mainly caused by surgery. Br J Surg. 2008;95(8):1020–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lange MM, et al. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(9):1578–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallner C, et al. Causes of fecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(27):4466–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Pas MH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guillou PJ, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang SB, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(7):637–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleshman J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stevenson AR, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deijen CL, et al. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3210–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buchs NC, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: a valid option for rectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(41):11700–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouanet P, et al. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(4):408–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M. Navigation in surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2013;398(4):501–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wadley J, et al. Pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance in modern neurosurgery: a review of 300 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):217–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawada K, et al. Stereotactic navigation during laparoscopic surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(12):977–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Atallah S, Tilahun Y, Monson JR. Real-time stereotactic navigation for the laparoscopic excision of a pelvic neoplasm. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(8):599–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wijsmuller AR, et al. A step towards stereotactic navigation during pelvic surgery: 3D nerve topography. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guerriero L, et al. Virtual reality exploration and planning for precision colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(6):719–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Franchini Melani AG, Diana M, Marescaux J. The quest for precision in transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1405-3. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

  22. Atallah S. The dawn of the digital operating theatre and the rise of the digital surgeon. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(9):499–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1325-2. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Bernard Dallemagne for his guidance during the projects leading up to this chapter. We also thank Guy Temporal and Chris Burel for their editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Romagnolo, L.G.C., Wijsmuller, A.R., Melani, A.G.F. (2019). Navigation for Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision. In: Atallah, S. (eds) Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11571-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11572-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics