Skip to main content

Retinoblastoma: Staging and Grouping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Ophthalmic Oncology

Abstract

A commonly used tumor classification is essential in order to plan initial treatment, determine prognosis, assess treatment response, compare outcomes, and plan clinical trials. Berman maintains that for tumor classifications to be successful, they must reflect clinical reality and must be changed as information is accrued. Almost never does the staging of the tumor rest solely with the subspecialty surgeon. It usually results from interaction between pathologists, oncologists, and the surgeon often aided by a tissue biopsy. This is not the case for retinoblastoma, and currently classification is based on clinical features. For almost all solid childhood malignancies, survival of the patient is the sole end point against which to assess treatment efficacy and side effects. In retinoblastoma, effective salvage of the globe is a secondary end point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fleming ID. Staging of pediatric cancers: problems in the development of a national system. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992;8:94–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman JJ. Tumor classification: molecular analysis meets Aristotle. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reese AB, Ellsworth RM. The evaluation and current concept of retinoblastoma therapy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1963;67:164–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellsworth RM. The practical management of retinoblastoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1969;67:462–534.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphree AL. Intraocular retinoblastoma: the case for a new group classification. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2005;18:41–53, viii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pratt CB, Fontanesi J, Lu X, et al. Proposal for a new staging scheme for intraocular and extraocular retinoblastoma based on an analysis of 103 globes. Oncologist. 1997;2:1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grabowski EF, Abramson DH. Intraocular and extraocular retinoblastoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1987;1:721–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stannard C, Sealy R, Hering E, et al. Postenucleation orbits in retinoblastoma: treatment with 125I brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:1446–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Retinoblastoma. In: Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 371–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff JBC, Ellsworth R. Extraocular retinoblastoma. In: Childrens cancer Study Group Protocol CCSG 962; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kivela T, Kujala E. Prognostication in eye cancer: the latest tumor, node, metastasis classification and beyond. Eye (Lond). 2013;27:243–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chantada G, Doz F, Antoneli CB, et al. A proposal for an international retinoblastoma staging system. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47:801–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chantada GL, Sampor C, Bosaleh A, et al. Comparison of staging systems for extraocular retinoblastoma: analysis of 533 patients. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1127–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sastre X, Chantada GL, Doz F, et al., International Retinoblastoma Staging Working Group. Proceedings of the consensus meetings from the International Retinoblastoma Staging Working Group on the pathology guidelines for the examination of enucleated eyes and evaluation of prognostic risk factors in retinoblastoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Graaf P, Goricke S, Rodjan F, et al., European Retinoblastoma Imaging Collaboration (ERIC). Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42:2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Novetsky DE, Abramson DH, Kim JW, et al. Published international classification of retinoblastoma (ICRB) definitions contain inconsistencies--an analysis of impact. Ophthalmic Genet. 2009;30:40–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berry JL, Jubran R, Kim JW, et al. Long-term outcomes of Group D eyes in bilateral retinoblastoma patients treated with chemoreduction and low-dose IMRT salvage. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:688–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, et al. The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shields CL, Shields JA. Basic understanding of current classification and management of retinoblastoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Berry JL, Jubran R, Wong K, et al. Factors predictive of long-term visual outcomes of Group D eyes treated with chemoreduction and low-dose IMRT salvage: the Children's Hospital Los Angeles experience. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1061–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Berry JL, Bechtold M, Shah S, et al. Not all seeds are created equal: seed classification is predictive of outcomes in retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1817–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Francis JH, Brodie SE, Marr B, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of intravitreous chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: four-year experience. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:488–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mallipatna AC. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berry JL, Xu L, Murphree AL, et al. Potential of aqueous humor as a surrogate tumor biopsy for retinoblastoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:1221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse L. Berry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berry, J.L., Murphree, A.L. (2019). Retinoblastoma: Staging and Grouping. In: Berry, J., Kim, J., Damato, B., Singh, A. (eds) Clinical Ophthalmic Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11123-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11123-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11122-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11123-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics