Abstract
The use of fitness landscapes as models and metaphors is increasingly common in the study of cultural evolution. Fitness landscapes used in this context are often based on imagery developed by Sewall Wright and depict a rugged topography of high-fitness peaks and low-fitness valleys. These landscape metaphors and models are used to explain both microscale changes in individual cultural forms and macroscale cultural transitions and diversifications. Recent research on the structure and dynamics of fitness landscapes, however, suggests that in many cases these rugged fitness landscapes may be misleading as they give rise to explanations that highlight the role of selection in directing cultural change and necessitate engagement with the problem of “peak shifting” in macroevolution. Advanced landscape theory suggests that realistic fitness landscapes may be highly multidimensional in nature, giving rise to a topography that includes neutral plateaus, ridges, and networks between peaks. This indicates that major cultural transitions as well as much microevolution may occur solely through neutral or nearly neutral changes, driven by drift rather than selection. We suggest that these advances in fitness landscape research may provide scholars of cultural change with powerful new imagery for theorizing patterns and processes in cultural evolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Each type of landscape is privy to a unique set of theoretical and methodological issues (for an exhaustive review, see Kaplan 2008). While detailing all of these is outside the purview of this paper, we note that the types of landscapes most often relied upon by cultural evolutionists, phenotypic adaptive and phenotypic fitness landscapes, are no exception. In the case of adaptive landscapes, the assumption is made that mean population fitness can be mapped onto frequencies (rather than distributions) of traits within a population (Kaplan 2008, p. 628), ignoring the fact that major evolutionary movement on landscapes, guided by selection, is dependent on the differential reproductive success of the individuals traversing it. For this reason, adaptive landscapes should be viewed as descriptive, rather than explanatory of the evolutionary process, and scholars of cultural evolution should use appropriate terminology to reflect this. In the case of fitness landscapes, there are often problems of accurate representation, for example, there is an inherent inability to meaningfully situate individual, discrete genotypes along a continuous axis, a problem that has now been widely commented on in the literature (Calcott 2008). There is also the issue of constructing a fitness function that provides a meaningful quantification of adaptive success with often limited knowledge of the genotype and population structure necessary to map genotypes to individual fitness values (in the case of genotypic fitness landscapes) or genotypes to phenotypes to fitness values (in the case of phenotypic fitness landscapes) (Pigliucci 2012; Pigliucci and Kaplan 2006, p. 185).
- 3.
Fitnesses on non-flat landscapes are assigned in a number of ways, including completely randomly, manually, or based on more complex functions. While an exhaustive account of all of these is impossible here we provide an example of landscape correlation in order to demonstrate the degree to which the process of fitness assignment impacts the topographical structure of the landscape. Uncorrelated fitness landscapes result from the random assignment of fitnesses to configurations on the space. In other words, on an uncorrelated landscape knowing the fitness of one configuration will reveal nothing about the fitness of its one-step neighbors. For example, on the well-studied NK landscape model evolutionary relationships between configurations depend on the interaction between traits (epistasis). The NK model has two parameters, N and K, where N is the number of traits and K is the number of interactions between traits and the K parameter determines the ruggedness of the fitness landscape. The K = N−1 landscape is an example of an entirely uncorrelated landscape space that is extremely rugged, with numerous peaks that are low and steep. The K = 0 landscape is highly correlated and knowing the fitness of one configuration does provide some information about the fitness of each of its one-step neighbors. On this landscape, the surface is smooth and there is a single, high peak with gradually increasing sides.
References
Adami, C. (1995). Self-organized criticality in living systems. Physics Letters A, 203(1), 29–32.
Andersson, C. (2013). Fidelity and the emergence of stable and cumulative sociotechnical systems. PaleoAnthropology, 2013, 88–103.
Andersson, C., & Törnberg, P. (2016). Fidelity and the speed of the treadmill: The combined impact of population size, transmission fidelity, and selection on the accumulation of cultural complexity. American Antiquity, 81, 576–590.
Ambrose, S. H. (1998). Chronology of the later stone age and food production in East Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25(4), 377–392.
Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291(5509), 1748–1753.
Barnett, L. (1998). Ruggedness and neutrality-the NKp family of fitness landscapes. In Artificial life VI: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on artificial life (pp. 18–27). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barton, L. P., Brantingham, J., & Ji, D. (2007). Late Pleistocene climate change and Paleolithic cultural evolution in northern China: implications from the Last Glacial Maximum. Developments in Quaternary Sciences, 9, 105–128.
Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(1547), 1443–1450.
Bentley, R. A., Lipo, C. P., Herzog, H. A., & Hahn, M. W. (2007). Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 151–158.
Bentley, R. A. (2008). Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: an evolutionary analysis of published keywords. Edited by Colin Allen. PLoS One, 3(8), e3057.
Bettinger, R. L. (2009). Macroevolutionary theory and archaeology: Is there a big picture? In A. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 275–295). New York: Springer.
Bettinger, R. L. (2015). Orderly anarchy: Sociopolitical evolution in aboriginal California. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Blount, Z. D., Barrick, J. E., Davidson, C. J., & Lenski, R. E. (2012). Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia Coli population. Nature, 489(7417), 513–518.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1987). The evolution of ethnic markers. Cultural Anthropology, 2(1), 65–79.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(2), 125–143.
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. (2011). Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(3), 431–444.
Brantingham, J. P., & Perreault, C. (2010). Detecting the effects of selection and stochastic forces in archaeological assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(12), 3211–3225.
Broughton, J. M., & Cannon, M. D. (Eds.). (2010). Evolutionary ecology and archaeology: applications to problems in human evolution and prehistory. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Brown, K. S., Marean, C. W., Jacobs, Z., Schoville, B. J., Oestmo, S. C., Fisher, J. B., et al. (2012). An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa. Nature, 491(7425), 590.
Caiado, C. C., Brock, W. A., Bentley, R. A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2016). Fitness landscapes among many options under social influence. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 405, 5–16.
Calcott, B. (2008). Assessing the fitness landscape revolution. Biology & Philosophy, 23(5), 639–657.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. No. 16. Princton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chatters, J. C. (2009). A macroevolutionary perspective on the archaeological record of North America. In A. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 213–234). New York: Springer.
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Crutchfield, J. P., & van Nimwegen, E. (2002). The evolutionary unfolding of complexity. In Evolution as computation (pp. 67–94). Berlin: Springer.
Derrida, B., & Peliti, L. (1991). Evolution in a flat fitness landscape. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 53(3), 355–382.
De Visser, J. A. G., & Krug, J. (2014). Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 15(7), 480–490.
Dunnell, R. C. (1980). Evolutionary theory and archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 35–99.
Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2005). Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24(4), 316–334.
Elena, S. F., Cooper, V. S., & Lenski, R. E. (1996). Punctuated evolution caused by selection of rare beneficial mutations. Science, 2722(5269), 1802–1804.
Flannery, K. V., & Marcus, J. (2000). Formative Mexican chiefdoms and the myth of the ‘mother culture. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19(1), 1–37.
Freese, E., & Yoshida, A. (1965). The role of mutations in evolution. In Evolving Genes and Proteins (pp. 341–355). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fontana, W., & Schuster, P. (1998). Shaping space: the possible and the attainable in RNA genotype–phenotype mapping. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194(4), 491–515.
Gavrilets, S. (1997). Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12(8), 307–312.
Gavrilets, S. (1999). A dynamical theory of speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. The American Naturalist, 154(1), 1–22.
Gavrilets, S. (2003). Evolution and speciation in a hyperspace: the roles of neutrality, selection, mutation and random drift. In Towards a comprehensive dynamics of evolution-exploring the interplay of selection, neutrality, accident, and function. J.P. Crutchfield and P. Schuster Eds. (pp. 135–162) New York: Oxford University Press.
Gavrilets, S. (2004). Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Monographs in population biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gavrilets, S. (2010). High-dimensional fitness landscapes and speciation. In M. Pigliucci & G. B. Müller (Eds.), Evolution: the extended synthesis (pp. 45–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gravner, J., Pitman, D., & Gavrilets, S. (2007). Percolation on fitness landscapes: effects of correlation, phenotype, and incompatibilities. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 248(4), 627–645.
Grefenstette, J. J. (1999). Evolvability in dynamic fitness landscapes: A genetic algorithm approach. In Evolutionary Computation, 1999. CEC 99. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress (Vol. 3, pp. 2031–2038).
Hartl, D. L., & Taubes, C. H. (1996). Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: Selection without adaptation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 182(3), 303–309.
Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—the Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69(2), 197–214.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.
Hovers, E., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2006). “Now You See it, Now You Don’t”—modern human behavior in the middle paleolithic. In Transitions before the transition (pp. 295–304). Boston, MA: Springer.
Hughes, A. L. (2007). Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: the misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level. Heredity, 99(4), 364.
Huynen, M. A., Stadler, P. F., & Fontana, W. (1996). Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(1), 397–401.
Kaplan, J. (2008). The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor? Biology and Philosophy, 23(5), 625–638.
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, S. A., & Johnsen, S. J. (1991). Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. Journal of theoretical biology, 149(4), 467–505.
Kauffman, S. A., & Weinberger, E. D. (1989). The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 141(2), 211–245.
Kauffman, S., & Levin, S. (1987). Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128(1), 11–45.
Kennett, D. J., & Winterhalder, B. (Eds.). (2006). Behavioral ecology and the transition to agriculture. Origins of human behavior and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217, 624–626.
Kuhn, S. L. (2006). Trajectories of change in the middle paleolithic of Italy. In E. Hovers & S. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition (pp. 109–120). New York: Springer.
Lande, R. (1994). Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution, 48(5), 1460–1469.
Lansing, J. S., & Kremer, J. N. (1993). Emergent properties of Balinese water temple networks: coadaptation on a rugged fitness landscape. American Anthropologist, 95(1), 97–114.
Lewontin, R. (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 293, 212–230.
Lombard, M. (2012). Thinking through the Middle Stone Age of Sub-Saharan Africa. Quaternary International, 270, 140–155.
Lombard, M., & Parsons, I. (2011). What happened to the human mind after the Howiesons Poort? Antiquity, 85(330), 1433–1443.
Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: Does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(9), 2640–2648.
Lynch, M., & Walsh, B. (2007). The origins of genome architecture, 98. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Marwick, B. (2013). Multiple Optima in Hoabinhian flaked stone artefact palaeoeconomics and palaeoecology at two archaeological sites in Northwest Thailand. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 32(4), 553–564.
McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(5), 453–563.
Mesoudi, A. (2008). Foresight in cultural evolution. Biology and Philosophy, 23(2), 243–255.
Mesoudi, A. (2011). An experimental comparison of human social learning strategies: payoff -biased social learning is adaptive but underused. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 334–342.
Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008a). The cultural transmission of great Basin projectile point technology I: An experimental simulation. American Antiquity, 73(1), 3–28.
Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008b). The cultural transmission of great Basin Projectile point technology II: An agent-based computer simulation. American Antiquity, 73(4), 627–644.
Moran, P. A. P. (2007). On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies. Annals of Human Genetics, 27(4), 383–393.
Neiman, F. D. (1995). Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity, 60(1), 7–36.
Newman, M. E. J., & Engelhardt, R. (1998). Effects of selective neutrality on the evolution of molecular species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1403), 1333–1338.
Niklas, K. J. (2004). Computer models of early land plant evolution. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 32(1), 47–66.
Nowak, S., & Krug, J. (2015). Analysis of adaptive walks on NK fitness landscapes with different interaction schemes. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 6, P06014. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1503.07796. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07796
Ohta, T. (1992). The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23(1), 263–286.
Petraglia, M. D., Korisettar, R., & Schuldenrein, J. (2003). Landscapes, activity, and the Acheulean to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Kaladgi Basin. India. Eurasian Prehistory, 1(2), 3–24.
Pigliucci, M. (2012). Landscapes, surfaces, and morphospaces: What are they good for? In The Adaptive (Ed.), Landscape in evolutionary biology (pp. 26–38). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Pigliucci, M., & Kaplan, J. M. (2006). Making sense of evolution: The conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Plutynski, A. (2008). The rise and fall of the adaptive landscape? Biology and Philosophy, 23(5), 605–623.
Poelwijk, F. J., Kiviet, D. J., Weinreich, D. M., & Sander, J. (2007). Tans. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature, 445(7126), 383–386.
Prentiss, W. C., & Chatters, J. C. (2003). Cultural diversification and decimation in the prehistoric record. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 33–58.
Prentiss, A. M., & Lenert, M. (2009). Cultural stasis and change in Northern North America: A macroevolutionary perspective. In A. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 235–251). New York: Springer.
Prentiss, A. M., Walsh, M. J., Foor, T. A., & Barnett, K. D. (2015). Cultural macroevolution among high latitude hunter–gatherers: A phylogenetic study of the Arctic Small Tool tradition. Journal of Archaeological Science, 59, 64–79.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1992). Cultural inheritance and evolutionary ecology. In Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 61–92). London: Routledge.
Richter, H. (2009). Detecting change in dynamic fitness landscapes. In 2009 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (pp. 1613–1620).
Richter, H. (2014). Frontiers of fitness landscapes: A summary of open questions. In H. Richter & A. Engelbrecht (Eds.), Recent advances in the theory and application of fitness landscapes (Vol. 6, pp. 529–544). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Schuster, P., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., & Hofacker, I. F. (1994). From sequences to shapes and back: A case study in RNA secondary structures. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 255(1344), 279–284.
Shennan, S. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11(1), 5–16.
Shennan, S. (Ed.). (2009). Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Smith, K. (2001). The importance of rapid cultural convergence in the evolution of learned Symbolic communication. In Advances in Artificial Life (pp. 637–640). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Smith, E. A., & Winterhalder, B. (1992). Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Psicataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Spencer, C. S. (2009). Testing the morphogenesist model of primary state formation: The Zapotec case. In A. M. Prentiss, I. Kuijt, & J. C. Chatters (Eds.), Macroevolution in human prehistory: Evolutionary theory and processual archaeology (pp. 133–155). New York: Springer.
Steele, J., Glatz, C., & Kandler, A. (2010). Ceramic diversity, random copying, and tests for selectivity in ceramic production. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(6), 1348–1358.
Stephan, W. (1996). The rate of compensatory evolution. Genetics, 144(1), 419–426.
Strathmann, R. R. (1978). Progressive vacating of adaptive types during the phanerozoic. Evolution, 32(4), 907–914.
Tryon, C. A., & Faith, J. T. (2013). Variability in the Middle Stone Age of Eastern Africa. Current Anthropology, 54(S8), S234–S254.
Valente, M. (2014). An NK-like model for complexity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(1), 107–134.
Van Nimwegen, E., Crutchfield, J. P., & Mitchell, M. (1997). Finite populations induce metastability in evolutionary search. Physics Letters A, 229(3), 144–150.
Van Nimwegen, E., Crutchfield, J. P., & Huynen, M. (1999). Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(17), 9716–9720.
Vassilev, V. K., Job, D., & Miller, J. F. (2000). Towards the automatic design of more efficient digital circuits. In Evolvable hardware, 2000. Proceedings. The Second NASA/DoD Workshop (pp. 151–160).
Wagner, A. (2011). The molecular origins of evolutionary innovations. Trends in Genetics, 27(10), 397–410.
Watts, C., & Gilbert, N. (2014). Simulating innovation: Computer-based tools for rethinking innovation. Cheltenahm, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wilke, C. O., Wang, J. L., Ofria, C., Lenski, R. E., & Adami, C. (2001). Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Nature, 412(6844), 331–333.
Wright, S. (1932). The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. The Sixth International Congress of Genetics, 1, 356–366.
Wright, S. (1988). Surfaces of selective value revisited. American Naturalist, 131, 115–123.
Zaman, L., Ofria, C., & Lenski, R. E. (2012). Finger-painting fitness landscapes: An interactive tool for exploring complex evolutionary dynamics. Artificial Life, 13, 499–505.
Zeder, M. A. (2009a). The Neolithic macro-(r) evolution: macroevolutionary theory and the study of culture change. Journal of Archaeological Research, 17, 1: 1–1:63.
Zeder, M. A. (2009b). Evolutionary biology and the emergence of agriculture: the value of co-opted models of evolution in the study of culture change. In Macroevolution in human prehistory (pp. 157–210). New York, NY: Springer.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Stephen Shennan and Ian Kuijt for their helpful comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank George Lesica, Matthew Walsh, Michelle Grocke, Anna Prentiss, and Randy Skelton for advice, support, ideas, and editorial assistance. Cheyenne Laue would like to thank the University of Montana Department of Anthropology, PEO, and AAUW for providing financial support during the writing of the manuscript. We assume full responsibility for all positions taken.Data Sharing Statement Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laue, C.L., Wright, A.H. (2019). Landscape Revolutions for Cultural Evolution: Integrating Advanced Fitness Landscapes into the Study of Cultural Change. In: Prentiss, A. (eds) Handbook of Evolutionary Research in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11117-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11117-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11116-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11117-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)