Abstract
There are many “new world”, or recently emergent, global challenges whose solutions require geotechnical inputs. Included among these challenges are climate change, enhancement of urban sustainability and resilience, energy and materials resource management, and management of water resources. Fundamental advances in the understanding of soil and rock properties and behavior, coupled with advances in sensing, monitoring and modeling of geo-systems, are needed for solutions to be found or implemented satisfactorily in each of these four areas. In addition, there is need for fundamental research that can improve the subsurface characterization and monitoring of complex geo-material behavior, the handling of multi-faceted, multi-scale geotechnical and geo-environmental processes, the integration of “big-data” and data-science methods into geotechnical engineering research and practice, and the management of uncertainty and risk. In addition to advancing fundamental research in geotechnics, geotechnical engineers also need to lend expertise and leadership to the interdisciplinary research and development efforts that are essential to ensuring our sustainable future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Here, geotechnical is broadly defined to include applications involving all engineering aspects of soil and rock properties, behavior and mechanics, as well as geo-environmental engineering.
- 2.
Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 assumes CO2—equivalent emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st Century.
- 3.
MIT [21] estimate the potential for generating more than 100 GWe by 2050 in the US alone.
- 4.
North Sea installations benefit from much shorter transmission distances to major population centers and possible power interconnects between the National Grids of countries that have substantial pumped storage capacity (such as Norway).
- 5.
E.g., proposed use of an abandoned mine cavity as the lower reservoir for a pumped storage project in Virginia http://www.enr.com/articles/42729-dominion-energy-eyes-2b-hydroelelctric-storage-project-in-va (September 13, 2017).
- 6.
At the time of writing (September 2017), Texas and Louisiana have just experienced record rainfalls associated with Hurricane Harvey, and massive flood and wind damage from hurricanes Irma and Maria has occurred in Florida and across the Caribbean islands.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
Wade Shepard, City Metric, August 25th, 2015.
- 12.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012. World Urbanization Prospects The 2011 Revision, New York.
- 13.
Exemplified by typhoon Morakot (2009 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Morakot).
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
Embodied energy of a material is defined as the sum total of all the energy required to produce that material.
- 18.
Ecological footprint of a project is the area of productive land required for executing different activities and for assimilating the emissions from such activities. Carbon footprint is an accounting tool that calculates the total emissions from different activities that lead to global climate change.
- 19.
- 20.
Opti is an internet of things approach to manage distributed stormwater infrastructure—see: https://optirtc.com/products. It is part of an emerging suite of geoenvironmental approaches to “smart” water management.
- 21.
- 22.
Water for thermoelectric power is used in generating electricity with steam-driven turbine generators.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
I.e., Interparticle forces and fabric (particle orientation and distribution).
- 26.
Often used in combination (e.g., seismic cone penetrometers).
- 27.
InSAR mainly uses spaceborne antennae, while LIDAR and GPR can be measured from airborne or ground stations.
References
Baecher, G.B., Christian, J.T.: Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering. Wiley (2003)
Birnal, P., Rashid, H. (Eds.): Climatic Hazards in Coastal Bangladesh. Elsevier Inc. (2016)
Brundtland Commision.: Our common future. UN Commission on World Environment and Development, p. 383. Oxford University Press (1987)
Chadwick R.A., Eiken, O.: Offshore CO2 storage: sleipner natural gas field beneath the North Sea (Chap. 10). In: Gluyas, J., Mathias, S. (Eds.) Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)—Geoscience, Technologies, Environmental Aspects and Legal Frameworks, pp. 227–250. Woodhead Publishing Ltd (2013). ISBN 978-0-85709-427-8
Chandler, R.J.: Clay sediments in depositional basins: the geotechnical cycle. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrol. 33, 7–39 (2000)
Chen, R., Zhang, L., Budhu, M.: Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 1802–1807 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000902
Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.: The development of constitutive laws for soil using the distinct element method. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1, 289–317 (1979)
Cygan, R.T., Liang, J.J., Kalinichev, A.G.: Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J. Phy. Chem. B 108, 1255–1266 (2004)
EPA.: Protecting water quality from urban runoff, United States Environmental Protection Agency, nonpoint source control branch report, EPA 841-F-03-003 (2013)
Falser, S., Uchida, S., Palmer, A.C., Soga, K., Tan, T.S.: Increased gas production from hydrates by combining depressurization with heating of the wellbore. Energy Fuels 26, 2667–6529 (2012)
Feighery, J., Mailloux, B.J., Ferguson, A S., Ahmed, K.M., van Geen, A., Culligan, P.J.: Transport of E. coli in aquifer sediments of Bangladesh: implications for widespread microbial contamination of groundwater. Water Resour. Res. 49(7), 3897–3911 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20289
Falagan, C., Grail, B.M., Johnson, D.B.: New approaches for extracting and recovering metals from mine tailings. Miner. Eng. 106, 71–78 (2017)
Holt, D.G.A, Jefferson, I., Braithwaite, P.A., Chapman, D.N.: Embedding sustainability into geotechnics. Part A: Methodology. In: Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 163 no. 3, pp. 127–135 (2009)
IPCC.: Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, D., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA (2013)
ISO.: International Organization for Standardization 1s0 14040:2006 (en): Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (2016). www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en
Kanji, M.A.: Critical issues in soft rocks. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 6(3), 186–195 (2014)
Konikow, L.F.: Groundwater depletion in the United States (1900–2008). USGS Sci. Inv. Rep. 2013–5079, 75p (2013)
Klein, et al.: Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ. Sci. Policy 8(6), 579–588 (2005)
Lapworth, D.J., Baran, N., Stuart, M.E., Ward, R.S.: Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ. Pollut. 163, 287–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034
McNutt, M.K., Chu, S.M., Lubchenco, J., Hunter, T., Dreyfus, G., Murawski, S.A., Kennedy, D.M.: Applications of science and engineering to quantify nd control the deepwater horizon oil spill. PNAS 109(50), 20222–20228 (2012)
MIT.: The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. Report prepared for Idaho National Laboratory, (2006). ISBN: 0615134386
Milly, P.C.D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R.M., Kunzewicz, Z.W., Lettenmaier, D.P., Stouffer, R.J.: Stationarity is dead. Whither water management? Science. 319, 573–574 (2008)
Murray, K.E., Thomas, S.M., Bodour, A.A.: Prioritizing research for trace pollutants and emerging contaminants in the freshwater environment. Environ. Pollut. 158(12), 3462–3471 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.009
National Academies Press.: Urban Stormwater Management in the United States, pp. 610. National Academies Press (2009)
Neri, A., Aspinall, W.P., Cioni, R., Bertagnini, A., Baxter, P.J., Zuccaro, G., Woo, G.: Developing an event tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 178(3), 397–415 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.05.014
NRC: Geological and geotechnical engineering in the new millennium: opportunities for research and technological innovation. In: Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, National Research Council, p. 222 (2006). ISBN: 0-309-65331-2
Ojha, R., Ramadas, M., Govindaraju, R.S.: Current and future challenges in groundwater. I: modeling and management of resources. J. Hydrol. Eng. 131023192005004 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000928
Pu, B., Ginoux, P.: Projection of American dustiness in the late 21st century due to climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 5553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05431-9
Randolph, M.F., Gourvenec, S.: Offshore Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 347. Spon Press, NY (2011)
Richey, A.S., Thomas, B.F., Lo, M.-H., Reager, J.T., Famiglietti, J.S., Voss, K., Rodell, M.: Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resour. Res., n/a–n/a. (2015) http://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349
Schaper, D.: 3 reasons Houston was a “sitting duck” for harvey flooding, NPR WNYC Radio (2017). http://www.npr.org/2017/08/31/547575113/three-reasons-houston-was-a-sitting-duck-for-harvey-flooding. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
Schijven, J.F., Hassanizadeh, S.M.: Removal of viruses by soil passage: overview of modeling, processes, and parameters. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 49–127 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380091184174
Shillaber, C.M., Mitchell, J.K., Dove, J.E.: Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. I: Definitions and Background. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. (2015a). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001410
Shillaber, C.M., Mitchell, J.K., Dove, J.E.: Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works II: working model and example. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. (2015b). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001411
Schuur, E.A.G., McGuire, A.D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J.W., Hayes, D.J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C.D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D.M., et al.: Climate change and the permeafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520(7546), 171–179 (2015)
Szulczewski, M.L., MacMinn, C.W., Herzog, H.J., Juanes, R.: Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as climate-change mitigation technology. PNAS 109(14), 5185–5189 (2012)
US Energy Information Administration (US EIA).: International Energy Outlook (2017). www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/mead_91417.pdf, www.eia.gov
USGCRP Melillo, J.M., Richmond, T.C., Yohe, G.W., (Eds.): Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program (2014)
Vahedifard, F., AghaKouchak, A., Robinson, J. D.: Drought threatens California’s levees. Science 329(6250), 799 (2015)
Vanmarcke, E.: Random fields: Analysis and Synthesis, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Company Pte. Ltd., Singapore (2010)
Van Paassen, L.A., Ghose, R., van der Linden, T.J.M., van der Star, W.R.L., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.: Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 136, 1721–1728 (2010)
Vonk, J.E., Sánchez-García, L., van Dongen, B.E., Alling, V., Kosmach, D., Charkin, A., Semiletov, I.P., Dudarev, O.V., Shakhova, N., Roos, P., Eglington, T.I., Andersson, A., Gustafsson, Ö.: Activation of old carbon by erosion of coastal and subsea permafrost in Arctic Siberia. Nature 489, 137–140 (2012)
Whittle A.J., Allen, M., Preis, A., Iqbal, M.: Sensor networks for monitoring and control of water distribution systems. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Hong Kong, 13p (2013). http://www.ishmii.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/K07.pdf
World Energy Council.: World Energy Resources, Geothermal (2016). www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WEResources_Geothermal_2016.pdf
Zachara, J.M., Long, P.E., Bargar, J., Davis, J.A., Fox, P., Fredrickson, J.K., Yabusaki, S.B.: Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone. J. Contam. Hydrol. 147, 45–72 (2013)
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., Crutzen,P.: The new world of the anthropocene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(7), 2228–2231 (2010)
Acknowledgements
This Book Chapter evolved from contributions made to a workshop entitled “Geotechnical Fundamentals in the Face of New World Challenges”, held at the National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, July 17th–19th, 2016. Funding for the workshop was provided by the National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1536733. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any supporting institution. The authors would like to thank Dr. Ning Lu for his constructive review comments and feedback on the contents of this Book Chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Culligan, P.J., Whittle, A.J., Mitchell, J.K. (2019). The Role of Geotechnics in Addressing New World Problems. In: Lu, N., Mitchell, J. (eds) Geotechnical Fundamentals for Addressing New World Challenges. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06249-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06249-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06248-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06249-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)