Skip to main content

The Role of Geotechnics in Addressing New World Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geotechnical Fundamentals for Addressing New World Challenges

Abstract

There are many “new world”, or recently emergent, global challenges whose solutions require geotechnical inputs. Included among these challenges are climate change, enhancement of urban sustainability and resilience, energy and materials resource management, and management of water resources. Fundamental advances in the understanding of soil and rock properties and behavior, coupled with advances in sensing, monitoring and modeling of geo-systems, are needed for solutions to be found or implemented satisfactorily in each of these four areas. In addition, there is need for fundamental research that can improve the subsurface characterization and monitoring of complex geo-material behavior, the handling of multi-faceted, multi-scale geotechnical and geo-environmental processes, the integration of “big-data” and data-science methods into geotechnical engineering research and practice, and the management of uncertainty and risk. In addition to advancing fundamental research in geotechnics, geotechnical engineers also need to lend expertise and leadership to the interdisciplinary research and development efforts that are essential to ensuring our sustainable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, geotechnical is broadly defined to include applications involving all engineering aspects of soil and rock properties, behavior and mechanics, as well as geo-environmental engineering.

  2. 2.

    Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 assumes CO2—equivalent emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st Century.

  3. 3.

    MIT [21] estimate the potential for generating more than 100 GWe by 2050 in the US alone.

  4. 4.

    North Sea installations benefit from much shorter transmission distances to major population centers and possible power interconnects between the National Grids of countries that have substantial pumped storage capacity (such as Norway).

  5. 5.

    E.g., proposed use of an abandoned mine cavity as the lower reservoir for a pumped storage project in Virginia http://www.enr.com/articles/42729-dominion-energy-eyes-2b-hydroelelctric-storage-project-in-va (September 13, 2017).

  6. 6.

    At the time of writing (September 2017), Texas and Louisiana have just experienced record rainfalls associated with Hurricane Harvey, and massive flood and wind damage from hurricanes Irma and Maria has occurred in Florida and across the Caribbean islands.

  7. 7.

    E.g., http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/about_dep/climate_resiliency.shtml.

  8. 8.

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/article166217947.html.

  9. 9.

    http://www.crossrail.co.uk.

  10. 10.

    http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/experts-warn-of-hefty-price-tag-for-singapores-underground-ambitions.

  11. 11.

    Wade Shepard, City Metric, August 25th, 2015.

  12. 12.

    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2012. World Urbanization Prospects The 2011 Revision, New York.

  13. 13.

    Exemplified by typhoon Morakot (2009 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Morakot).

  14. 14.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/japan-methane-hydrate/japan-reports-successful-gas-output-test-from-methane-hydrate-idUSL4N1IA35A.

  15. 15.

    https://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/World-Statistics/World-Nuclear-Generation-and-Capacity.

  16. 16.

    http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2009/094401.pdf.

  17. 17.

    Embodied energy of a material is defined as the sum total of all the energy required to produce that material.

  18. 18.

    Ecological footprint of a project is the area of productive land required for executing different activities and for assimilating the emissions from such activities. Carbon footprint is an accounting tool that calculates the total emissions from different activities that lead to global climate change.

  19. 19.

    http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/waterresourcesmanagement.

  20. 20.

    Opti is an internet of things approach to manage distributed stormwater infrastructure—see: https://optirtc.com/products. It is part of an emerging suite of geoenvironmental approaches to “smart” water management.

  21. 21.

    http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diarrhoeal-disease.

  22. 22.

    Water for thermoelectric power is used in generating electricity with steam-driven turbine generators.

  23. 23.

    https://water.usgs.gov/edu/wusw.html.

  24. 24.

    https://www.nap.edu/read/13393/chapter/5#59.

  25. 25.

    I.e., Interparticle forces and fabric (particle orientation and distribution).

  26. 26.

    Often used in combination (e.g., seismic cone penetrometers).

  27. 27.

    InSAR mainly uses spaceborne antennae, while LIDAR and GPR can be measured from airborne or ground stations.

References

  1. Baecher, G.B., Christian, J.T.: Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering. Wiley (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birnal, P., Rashid, H. (Eds.): Climatic Hazards in Coastal Bangladesh. Elsevier Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brundtland Commision.: Our common future. UN Commission on World Environment and Development, p. 383. Oxford University Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chadwick R.A., Eiken, O.: Offshore CO2 storage: sleipner natural gas field beneath the North Sea (Chap. 10). In: Gluyas, J., Mathias, S. (Eds.) Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)—Geoscience, Technologies, Environmental Aspects and Legal Frameworks, pp. 227–250. Woodhead Publishing Ltd (2013). ISBN 978-0-85709-427-8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandler, R.J.: Clay sediments in depositional basins: the geotechnical cycle. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrol. 33, 7–39 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, R., Zhang, L., Budhu, M.: Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 1802–1807 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000902

  7. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.: The development of constitutive laws for soil using the distinct element method. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1, 289–317 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cygan, R.T., Liang, J.J., Kalinichev, A.G.: Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J. Phy. Chem. B 108, 1255–1266 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. EPA.: Protecting water quality from urban runoff, United States Environmental Protection Agency, nonpoint source control branch report, EPA 841-F-03-003 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falser, S., Uchida, S., Palmer, A.C., Soga, K., Tan, T.S.: Increased gas production from hydrates by combining depressurization with heating of the wellbore. Energy Fuels 26, 2667–6529 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feighery, J., Mailloux, B.J., Ferguson, A S., Ahmed, K.M., van Geen, A., Culligan, P.J.: Transport of E. coli in aquifer sediments of Bangladesh: implications for widespread microbial contamination of groundwater. Water Resour. Res. 49(7), 3897–3911 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20289

  12. Falagan, C., Grail, B.M., Johnson, D.B.: New approaches for extracting and recovering metals from mine tailings. Miner. Eng. 106, 71–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holt, D.G.A, Jefferson, I., Braithwaite, P.A., Chapman, D.N.: Embedding sustainability into geotechnics. Part A: Methodology. In: Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 163 no. 3, pp. 127–135 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IPCC.: Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, D., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M. (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO.: International Organization for Standardization 1s0 14040:2006 (en): Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (2016). www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en

  16. Kanji, M.A.: Critical issues in soft rocks. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 6(3), 186–195 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Konikow, L.F.: Groundwater depletion in the United States (1900–2008). USGS Sci. Inv. Rep. 2013–5079, 75p (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, et al.: Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ. Sci. Policy 8(6), 579–588 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapworth, D.J., Baran, N., Stuart, M.E., Ward, R.S.: Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: a review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ. Pollut. 163, 287–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McNutt, M.K., Chu, S.M., Lubchenco, J., Hunter, T., Dreyfus, G., Murawski, S.A., Kennedy, D.M.: Applications of science and engineering to quantify nd control the deepwater horizon oil spill. PNAS 109(50), 20222–20228 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MIT.: The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. Report prepared for Idaho National Laboratory, (2006). ISBN: 0615134386

    Google Scholar 

  22. Milly, P.C.D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R.M., Kunzewicz, Z.W., Lettenmaier, D.P., Stouffer, R.J.: Stationarity is dead. Whither water management? Science. 319, 573–574 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murray, K.E., Thomas, S.M., Bodour, A.A.: Prioritizing research for trace pollutants and emerging contaminants in the freshwater environment. Environ. Pollut. 158(12), 3462–3471 (2010). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.009

  24. National Academies Press.: Urban Stormwater Management in the United States, pp. 610. National Academies Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neri, A., Aspinall, W.P., Cioni, R., Bertagnini, A., Baxter, P.J., Zuccaro, G., Woo, G.: Developing an event tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius. J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. 178(3), 397–415 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. NRC: Geological and geotechnical engineering in the new millennium: opportunities for research and technological innovation. In: Committee on Geological and Geotechnical Engineering, National Research Council, p. 222 (2006). ISBN: 0-309-65331-2

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ojha, R., Ramadas, M., Govindaraju, R.S.: Current and future challenges in groundwater. I: modeling and management of resources. J. Hydrol. Eng. 131023192005004 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000928

  28. Pu, B., Ginoux, P.: Projection of American dustiness in the late 21st century due to climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 5553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05431-9

  29. Randolph, M.F., Gourvenec, S.: Offshore Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 347. Spon Press, NY (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richey, A.S., Thomas, B.F., Lo, M.-H., Reager, J.T., Famiglietti, J.S., Voss, K., Rodell, M.: Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resour. Res., n/a–n/a. (2015) http://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349

  31. Schaper, D.: 3 reasons Houston was a “sitting duck” for harvey flooding, NPR WNYC Radio (2017). http://www.npr.org/2017/08/31/547575113/three-reasons-houston-was-a-sitting-duck-for-harvey-flooding. Accessed 14 Oct 2017

  32. Schijven, J.F., Hassanizadeh, S.M.: Removal of viruses by soil passage: overview of modeling, processes, and parameters. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(1), 49–127 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380091184174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shillaber, C.M., Mitchell, J.K., Dove, J.E.: Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. I: Definitions and Background. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. (2015a). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001410

  34. Shillaber, C.M., Mitchell, J.K., Dove, J.E.: Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works II: working model and example. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. (2015b). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0001411

  35. Schuur, E.A.G., McGuire, A.D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J.W., Hayes, D.J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C.D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D.M., et al.: Climate change and the permeafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520(7546), 171–179 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Szulczewski, M.L., MacMinn, C.W., Herzog, H.J., Juanes, R.: Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as climate-change mitigation technology. PNAS 109(14), 5185–5189 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. US Energy Information Administration (US EIA).: International Energy Outlook (2017). www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/mead_91417.pdf, www.eia.gov

  38. USGCRP Melillo, J.M., Richmond, T.C., Yohe, G.W., (Eds.): Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vahedifard, F., AghaKouchak, A., Robinson, J. D.: Drought threatens California’s levees. Science 329(6250), 799 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vanmarcke, E.: Random fields: Analysis and Synthesis, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Company Pte. Ltd., Singapore (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Paassen, L.A., Ghose, R., van der Linden, T.J.M., van der Star, W.R.L., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.: Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 136, 1721–1728 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vonk, J.E., Sánchez-García, L., van Dongen, B.E., Alling, V., Kosmach, D., Charkin, A., Semiletov, I.P., Dudarev, O.V., Shakhova, N., Roos, P., Eglington, T.I., Andersson, A., Gustafsson, Ö.: Activation of old carbon by erosion of coastal and subsea permafrost in Arctic Siberia. Nature 489, 137–140 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Whittle A.J., Allen, M., Preis, A., Iqbal, M.: Sensor networks for monitoring and control of water distribution systems. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Hong Kong, 13p (2013). http://www.ishmii.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/K07.pdf

  44. World Energy Council.: World Energy Resources, Geothermal (2016). www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WEResources_Geothermal_2016.pdf

  45. Zachara, J.M., Long, P.E., Bargar, J., Davis, J.A., Fox, P., Fredrickson, J.K., Yabusaki, S.B.: Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone. J. Contam. Hydrol. 147, 45–72 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., Crutzen,P.: The new world of the anthropocene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(7), 2228–2231 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Book Chapter evolved from contributions made to a workshop entitled “Geotechnical Fundamentals in the Face of New World Challenges”, held at the National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, July 17th–19th, 2016. Funding for the workshop was provided by the National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1536733. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any supporting institution. The authors would like to thank Dr. Ning Lu for his constructive review comments and feedback on the contents of this Book Chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia J. Culligan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Culligan, P.J., Whittle, A.J., Mitchell, J.K. (2019). The Role of Geotechnics in Addressing New World Problems. In: Lu, N., Mitchell, J. (eds) Geotechnical Fundamentals for Addressing New World Challenges. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06249-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06249-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06248-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06249-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics