Abstract
Structuring reorganization, implementation, communication or education is a major challenge. Reference models can support all these tasks by providing a generic and customizable yet technology-independent and instantiable structure to organize and further texture future applications. Their benefit is undisputed. Yet, assessing reference models is difficult. We propose the GOAT criteria to assess the perfection of reference models from a more strategic perspective. To illustrate our criteria framework, we assess the reference models Retail-H and Common Data Model (CDM) side by side. The initial results indicate that our criteria can be used to make an initial high-level assessment of reference models for later detailed analyses. In our comparison, the Retail-H performed well in most categories, the CDM excelled in terms of transferability. This came at the price of genericity. While the Retail-H has proved to be durable over 20 years since its inception, the longevity of the Microsoft’s CDM remains to be seen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term GOAT is used in professional sports as well. It is attached to players such as Roger Federer, Wayne Gretzky, Tom Brady. We propose to attach the term GOAT to Jörg Becker for his achievement in reference modelling.
- 2.
References
Becker, J., Niehaves, B., & Knackstedt, R. (2004). Bezugsrahmen zur epistemologischen Positionierung der Referenzmodellierung. In J. Becker & P. Delfmann (Eds.), Referenzmodellierung: Grundlagen, Techniken und domänenbezogene Anwednung (pp. 1–17). Heidelberg: Physica.
Becker, J., & Schütte, R. (2004). Handelsinformationssysteme: Domänenorientierte Einführung in die Wirtschaftsinformatik (2nd ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Redline Wirtschaft.
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976). The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9–36.
Delfmann, P. (2006). Adaptive Referenzmodellierung: Methodische Konzepte zur Konstruktion und Anwendung wieder verwendungsorientierter Informationsmodelle. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
DIN. (2015). Quality management systems - requirements (ISO 9001:2015).
Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models: A methodology and its application. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1(1), 35–53.
Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2007). Perspectives on Reference Modeling. In P. Fettke & P. Loos (Eds.), Reference modeling for business systems analysis (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA/London: Idea Group.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.
Grochla, E., & Szypersk, N. (Eds.). (1971). Management-Informationssysteme: Eine Herausforderung an Forschung und Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (p. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
LL Cool, J. (2000). G.O.A.T. (Greatest of All Time). Santa Monica, CA: Def Jam, Universal.
Microsoft Corporation. (2017). Common data model and data integration. Retrieved from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/business-applications-release-notes/april18/data-integration/common-data-model-data-integration.
Microsoft Corporation. (2018). Common data model and data integration. Retrieved from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/business-applicationsrelease-notes/april18/data-integration/common-data-model-data-integration.
Nadella, S., Shaw, G., & Nichols, J. T. (2017). Hit refresh. Kulmbach: Börsenmedien AG.
Object Management Group Inc. (2013). Business process model and notation (BPMN) Version 2.0.2.
Scheer, A.-W. (1997). Wirtschaftsinformatik: Referenzmodelle für industrielle Geschäftsprozesse (Aufl. 7). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Schütte, R. (2013). Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Referenzmodellierung: Konstruktion konfigurations- und anpassungsorientierter Modelle. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Schütte, R., & Rotthowe, T. (1998). The guidelines of modeling–an approach to enhance the quality in information models. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER) (pp. 240–254). Singapore (SG).
Schwegmann, A. (1999). Objektorientierte Referenzmodellierung: Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Thomas, O. (2006). Das Referenzmodellverständnis in der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Historie, Literaturanalyse und Begriffsexplikation. In P. Loos (Ed.), Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik (Vol. 187). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.
vom Brocke, J. (2003). Referenzmodellierung: Gestaltung und Verteilung von Konstruktionsprozessen. Berlin: Logos Verlag.
vom Brocke, J. (2007). Design principles for reference modelling: reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialisation, instantiation, and analogy. In P. Fettke & P. Loos (Eds.), Reference modeling for business systems analysis (pp. 47–75). Hershey, PA/London: Idea Group.
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janiesch, C., Winkelmann, A. (2019). The Goat Criteria—A Structured Assessment Approach for Reference Models. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06234-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)