Abstract
Every day, innovative devices support healthcare for the escalating needs of the population ageing but the poor adoption hinder their spread older adults. The present study aims to investigate the factors that may influence perceptions and expectations of 306 Italian older adults (M = 74, SD = 7.43) towards smart home and wellbeing technology. A questionnaire was verbally administered in face-to-face sessions by trained interviewers in order to collect data. Overall, the results return a positive picture of participants’ perception of the technology though attitude towards technology is definitely driven by utilitaristic means: usefulness, easiness, safety and privacy are considered important while aesthetics, size and weight are not. Around half of our respondents have a positive interest in technology and almost all of them believe that technology may eventually improve their life. According to these findings, the paper discusses some challenges for the whole research sector that appears still fragmentary and lacking of a strong body of evidence. Moreover, the promotion of trust and empowerment actions through instructional programs is highlighted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adair B, Miller K, Ozanne E, Hansen R, Pearce AJ, Santamaria N, Said CM (2013) Smart-home technologies to assist older people to live well at home. J Aging Sci
Arning K, Ziefle M (2007) Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput Hum Behav 23(6):2904–2927
Boström M, Bravell M, Lundgren D, Björklund A (2013) Promoting sense of security in old-age care. Health 5:56–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.56a2009
Bowling A (2005) Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health 27(3):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031
Chen K, Chan AH (2011) A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10(1):1–12
Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M (2009, August) Useful, social and enjoyable: mobile phone adoption by older people. In: IFIP conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–76
Costa F (2014) Big data in biomedicine. In: Drug discovery today, vol 19, Issue 4, pp 433–440. ISSN 1359-6446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.012
Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J (2006) Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 21(2):333
Demiris G, Rantz MJ, Aud MA, Marek KD, Tyrer HW, Skubic M, Hussam AA (2004) Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet Med 29(2):87–94
Farage MA, Miller KW, Ajayi F, Hutchins D (2012) Design principles to accommodate older adults. Glob J Health Sci 4(2):2
Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J (2009) Designing for older adults: principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press
Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE (2015) Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis) empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 48:415–423
Jacelon CS, Hanson A (2013) Older adults’ participation in the development of smart environments: an integrated review of the literature. Geriatr Nurs 34(2):116–121
Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, Hersh W (2008) Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically III, and underserved. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 175. AHRQ Publication No 09-E004. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, Nov 2008
Lee C, Coughlin JF (2015) Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manag 32(5):747–759
Leonardi C, Mennecozzi C, Not E, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M, Gennai F, Cristoforetti A (2009, April) Knocking on elders’ door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1703–1712
Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Miguel-Cruz A, Rios Rincon A (2016) Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 91:44–59
McCreadie C, Tinker A (2005) The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc 25(01):91–110
Melenhorst AS, Rogers WA, Caylor EC (2001, October) The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 45, no 3. SAGE Publications, pp 221–225
Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1710–1721
Morton TA, Wilson N, Haslam C, Birney M, Kingston R, McCloskey LG (2016) Activating and guiding the engagement of seniors with online social networking experimental findings from the ages 2.0 project. J Aging Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316664440
Nijhof N, van Gemert-Pijnen LJ, Woolrych R, Sixsmith A (2013) An evaluation of preventive sensor technology for dementia care. J Telemed Telecare 19(2):95–100
Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, Nieboer ME, van der Voort CS, Aarts S, Wouters EJ (2015) Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62(2):226–237
Pol MC, van Nes F, van Hartingsveldt M, Buurman BM, de Rooij SE, Kröse BJA (2014) P315: older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. Eur Geriatr Med 5:S180–S181
Porter CE, Donthu N (2006) Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J Bus Res 59(9):999–1007
Quinn K (2016) 10 Older adults and social media. Digital media usage across the life course, p 132
Sarker S, Wells JD (2003) Understanding mobile handheld device use and adoption. Commun ACM 46(12):35–40
Schulz R, Wahl HW, Matthews JT, Dabbs ADV, Beach SR, Czaja SJ (2014) Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontology gnu071
Seeman TE, Lusignolo TM, Albert M, Berkman L (2001) Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychol 20(4):243
Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L (2003) Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc 23(05):561–582
Spinsante S, Stara V, Felici E, Montanini L, Raffaeli L, Rossi L, Gambi E (2016) The human factor in the design of successful ambient assisted living technologies. Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments. Princ Technol Control 61
Stara V, Harte R, Di Rosa M, Rossi L, ÓLaighin G (2016) Toward a connected health system for older adults: lessons learned. In: Advances in physical ergonomics and human factors. Springer, Cham, pp 849–857
Thielke S, Harniss M, Thompson H, Patel S, Demiris G, Johnson K (2012) Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs and the adoption of health-related technologies for older adults. Ageing Int 37(4):470–488
Van Hoof J, Kort HSM, Rutten PGS, Duijnstee MSH (2011) Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform 80(5):310–331
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci 27(3):451–481
Vroman KG, Arthanat S, Lysack C (2015) “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput Hum Behav 43:156–166
Walsh K, Callan A (2011) Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: a case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int 36(1):102–122
Wild K, Boise L, Lundell J, Foucek A (2008) Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: reactions and perceptions of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 27(2):181–200
Wilkowska W, Ziefle M (2009, November) Which factors form older adults’ acceptance of mobile information and communication technologies?. In: Symposium of the austrian HCI and usability engineering group. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–101
Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A (2016) Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 94:112–116
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Italian Ministry for University and Research through the project “Active Ageing@home”, within the National Technological Cluster (CTN01_00128_297061, TAV—Tecnologie per gli Ambienti di Vita) venture in the PON-2013-FESR framework.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stara, V., Zancanaro, M., Di Rosa, M., Rossi, L., Pinnelli, S. (2019). Understanding the Interest Toward Smart Home Technology: The Role of Utilitaristic Perspective. In: Leone, A., Caroppo, A., Rescio, G., Diraco, G., Siciliano, P. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05920-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05921-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)