Skip to main content

Understanding the Interest Toward Smart Home Technology: The Role of Utilitaristic Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 544))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Every day, innovative devices support healthcare for the escalating needs of the population ageing but the poor adoption hinder their spread older adults. The present study aims to investigate the factors that may influence perceptions and expectations of 306 Italian older adults (M = 74, SD = 7.43) towards smart home and wellbeing technology. A questionnaire was verbally administered in face-to-face sessions by trained interviewers in order to collect data. Overall, the results return a positive picture of participants’ perception of the technology though attitude towards technology is definitely driven by utilitaristic means: usefulness, easiness, safety and privacy are considered important while aesthetics, size and weight are not. Around half of our respondents have a positive interest in technology and almost all of them believe that technology may eventually improve their life. According to these findings, the paper discusses some challenges for the whole research sector that appears still fragmentary and lacking of a strong body of evidence. Moreover, the promotion of trust and empowerment actions through instructional programs is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adair B, Miller K, Ozanne E, Hansen R, Pearce AJ, Santamaria N, Said CM (2013) Smart-home technologies to assist older people to live well at home. J Aging Sci

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arning K, Ziefle M (2007) Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput Hum Behav 23(6):2904–2927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boström M, Bravell M, Lundgren D, Björklund A (2013) Promoting sense of security in old-age care. Health 5:56–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.56a2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowling A (2005) Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health 27(3):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen K, Chan AH (2011) A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M (2009, August) Useful, social and enjoyable: mobile phone adoption by older people. In: IFIP conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 63–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Costa F (2014) Big data in biomedicine. In: Drug discovery today, vol 19, Issue 4, pp 433–440. ISSN 1359-6446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J (2006) Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 21(2):333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demiris G, Rantz MJ, Aud MA, Marek KD, Tyrer HW, Skubic M, Hussam AA (2004) Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet Med 29(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farage MA, Miller KW, Ajayi F, Hutchins D (2012) Design principles to accommodate older adults. Glob J Health Sci 4(2):2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J (2009) Designing for older adults: principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill R, Betts LR, Gardner SE (2015) Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis) empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 48:415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacelon CS, Hanson A (2013) Older adults’ participation in the development of smart environments: an integrated review of the literature. Geriatr Nurs 34(2):116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, Hersh W (2008) Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically III, and underserved. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 175. AHRQ Publication No 09-E004. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, Nov 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee C, Coughlin JF (2015) Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manag 32(5):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardi C, Mennecozzi C, Not E, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M, Gennai F, Cristoforetti A (2009, April) Knocking on elders’ door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1703–1712

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, Miguel-Cruz A, Rios Rincon A (2016) Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 91:44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCreadie C, Tinker A (2005) The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing Soc 25(01):91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Melenhorst AS, Rogers WA, Caylor EC (2001, October) The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 45, no 3. SAGE Publications, pp 221–225

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1710–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morton TA, Wilson N, Haslam C, Birney M, Kingston R, McCloskey LG (2016) Activating and guiding the engagement of seniors with online social networking experimental findings from the ages 2.0 project. J Aging Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316664440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nijhof N, van Gemert-Pijnen LJ, Woolrych R, Sixsmith A (2013) An evaluation of preventive sensor technology for dementia care. J Telemed Telecare 19(2):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD, Nieboer ME, van der Voort CS, Aarts S, Wouters EJ (2015) Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62(2):226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pol MC, van Nes F, van Hartingsveldt M, Buurman BM, de Rooij SE, Kröse BJA (2014) P315: older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. Eur Geriatr Med 5:S180–S181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Porter CE, Donthu N (2006) Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J Bus Res 59(9):999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Quinn K (2016) 10 Older adults and social media. Digital media usage across the life course, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sarker S, Wells JD (2003) Understanding mobile handheld device use and adoption. Commun ACM 46(12):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schulz R, Wahl HW, Matthews JT, Dabbs ADV, Beach SR, Czaja SJ (2014) Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontology gnu071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seeman TE, Lusignolo TM, Albert M, Berkman L (2001) Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychol 20(4):243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Selwyn N, Gorard S, Furlong J, Madden L (2003) Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc 23(05):561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spinsante S, Stara V, Felici E, Montanini L, Raffaeli L, Rossi L, Gambi E (2016) The human factor in the design of successful ambient assisted living technologies. Ambient assisted living and enhanced living environments. Princ Technol Control 61

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stara V, Harte R, Di Rosa M, Rossi L, ÓLaighin G (2016) Toward a connected health system for older adults: lessons learned. In: Advances in physical ergonomics and human factors. Springer, Cham, pp 849–857

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thielke S, Harniss M, Thompson H, Patel S, Demiris G, Johnson K (2012) Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs and the adoption of health-related technologies for older adults. Ageing Int 37(4):470–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Hoof J, Kort HSM, Rutten PGS, Duijnstee MSH (2011) Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform 80(5):310–331

    Google Scholar 

  35. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci 27(3):451–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vroman KG, Arthanat S, Lysack C (2015) “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput Hum Behav 43:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Walsh K, Callan A (2011) Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: a case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int 36(1):102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wild K, Boise L, Lundell J, Foucek A (2008) Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: reactions and perceptions of older adults. J Appl Gerontol 27(2):181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilkowska W, Ziefle M (2009, November) Which factors form older adults’ acceptance of mobile information and communication technologies?. In: Symposium of the austrian HCI and usability engineering group. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A (2016) Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 94:112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry for University and Research through the project “Active Ageing@home”, within the National Technological Cluster (CTN01_00128_297061, TAV—Tecnologie per gli Ambienti di Vita) venture in the PON-2013-FESR framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Stara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stara, V., Zancanaro, M., Di Rosa, M., Rossi, L., Pinnelli, S. (2019). Understanding the Interest Toward Smart Home Technology: The Role of Utilitaristic Perspective. In: Leone, A., Caroppo, A., Rescio, G., Diraco, G., Siciliano, P. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05920-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05921-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics