Skip to main content

Immediate Loading in Atrophic Jaws: Zygomatic Implants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Immediate Dental Implant Loading

Abstract

The zygomatic fixture is an extended length (35–55 mm) titanium implant, placed into the zygomatic and maxillary alveolar bone. It was designed for situations where atrophy of the posterior maxilla complicates or prevents the placing of conventional implants. The use of zygomatic implants avoids the need for bone grafting, shortens treatment times, and reduces morbidity. They have also been used in patients with maxillectomies resulting from tumors or diseases associated with atrophic conditions of the maxilla.

We elaborated a review for this chapter summarizing the implant survival rates of zygomatic implants immediately loaded. Of a total of 1040 patients treated with zygomatic (2179 implants) and regular implants (3117 implants), an implant survival rate of 95.12–100% and 94.9–100% is expected, respectively, up to 10 years. For patients treated with the all-on-four zygoma or quad zygoma concept, 80 patients treated with 360 zygomatic implants, an implant survival rate of 96–100% is expected up to 5 years. The most frequent mechanical complication is the fracture of the prosthesis or the veneering material. Because the original protocol to insert zygomatic implants needs an intrasinusal approach, sinus complications are reported frequently in the literature associated with this procedure. In our review, of 764 patients, 63 (8.24%) suffered sinus complications.

Five different surgical techniques have been described in the literature for zygomatic implant placement: the classical approach or Brånemark approach, the sinus slot technique, the exteriorized approach, the minimally invasive approach by the use of custom-made drill guides, and the computer-aided surgical navigation system approach. In this chapter we are going to resume the first three, because these are still the most common approaches for the surgical placement of zygomatic implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghabeigi B, Bousdras VA. Rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy with zygomatic implants: clinical report of 4 cases. Br Dent J. 2007;202:669–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlgren F, Størksen K, Tornes K. A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months’ follow-up after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:421–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida PHT, Salvoni AD, França FMG. Evaluation of satisfaction of individuals rehabilitated with zygomatic implants as regards anesthetic and sedative procedure: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;22:22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Nawas B, Wegener J, Bender C, et al. Critical soft tissue parameters of the zygomatic implant. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C. A proposed classification for zygomatic implant patients based on the zygoma anatomy guided approach (ZAGA): a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4:269–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Garcia R, et al. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8:114–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Hatano N. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Aparicio A, et al. Extrasinus zygomatic implants: three year experience from a new surgical approach for patients with pronounced buccal concavities in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010a;12:55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Aparicio A, et al. Immediate/early loading of zygomatic implants: clinical experiences after 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010b;12:e77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, et al. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontol 2000. 2014a;66:41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, et al. The long-term use of zygomatic implants: a 10-year clinical and radiographic report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014b;16:447–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Teeth in a day for the maxilla and mandible: case report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A retrospective analysis of 110 zygomatic implants in a single-stage immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:335–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Shuscavage NJ, et al. Zygomatic bone-to-implant contact in 77 patients with partially or completely edentulous maxillas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:2065–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Abrahamsson P, et al. Evaluation of 31 zygomatic implants and 74 regular dental implants used in 16 patients for prosthetic reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with cross-arch fixed bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrossian E. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with the zygoma concept: a 7-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1213–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrossian E, Stumpel L III. Immediate stabilization at stage II of zygomatic implants: rationale and technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:10–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrossian E, Stumpel L III, Beckely ML, et al. The zygomatic implant: preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:861–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrossian E, Rangert B, Stumpel L, et al. Immediate function with the zygomatic implant: a graftless solution for the patient with mild to advanced atrophy of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:937–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedrossian E, Sullivan RM, Fortin Y, et al. Fixed-prosthetic implant restoration of the edentulous maxilla: a systematic pretreatment evaluation method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:112–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolai R, Aversa A, Catelani C, et al. Treatment of extreme maxillary atrophy with zygoma implants. Minerva Stomatol. 2015;64:253–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF. The zygomaticus implant protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla. SADJ. 2003a;58:106–9, 113–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes-Varley J, Howes D, Lownie J, et al. Surgical modifications to the Branemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003b;18:232–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brånemark PI. Surgery and fixture installation: zygomaticus fixture clinical procedures. 1st ed. Gothenburg: Nobel Biocare AB; 1998. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brånemark PI, Grondahl K, Ohrnell LO, et al. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J, Hui E, Lee PK, et al. Zygomatic implants: protocol for immediate occlusal loading: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:804–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow J, Wat P, Hui E, et al. A new method to eliminate the risk of maxillary sinusitis with zygomatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1233–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chrcanovic BR, Pedrosa AR, Custodio ALN. Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;17:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an update systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1949–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R. Zygomatic implants placed with a 2-stage procedure: a 5-year retrospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:115–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Pons O. Prostheses supported by four immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a 3-year prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6:263–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Pons O. 5-year outcome of cross-arch prostheses supported by four immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a prospective case series. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015;8:169–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Malevez C, Rojas J. Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma implants: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Malevez C, López-Orellana C, et al. Sinus reactions to immediately loaded zygoma implants: a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008a;1:53–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Malevez C, Rojas J, et al. Clinical outcome of 42 patients treated with 81 immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a 12- to 42 month retrospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008b;1:141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Pons O, Rojas J, et al. Immediate function of four zygomatic implants: a 1-year report of a prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:323–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davó R, Malevez C, Pons O. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a 5-year prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6:39–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte LR, Filho HN, Francischone CE, et al. The establishment of a protocol for the total rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae employing four zygomatic fixtures in an immediate loading system—a 30 month clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:186–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzad P, Andersson L, Gunnarsson S, et al. Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: an evaluation of implant stability, tissue conditions, and patients’ opinion before and after treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:399–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara ED, Stella JP. Restoration of the edentulous maxilla: the case for the zygomatic implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1418–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Henry PJ, et al. A clinical evaluation of the Zygoma fixture: one year of follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung KF, Ai QY, Fan SC, et al. Measurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:841–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahnberg KE, Henry PJ, Hirsch JM, et al. Clinical evaluation of the zygoma implant: 3-year follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2033–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malevez C. The zygoma quad approach: rehabilitation of an extremely atrophied maxilla using four zygoma implants. In: Aparicio C, editor. Zygomatic implants: the anatomy guided approach. 1st ed. Berlin: Quintessence; 2012. p. 173–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, et al. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6–48 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maló P, Nobre MA, Lopes I. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:354–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maló P, Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. Three-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded extra-maxillary zygomatic implants. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5:37–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maló P, Nobre MA, Lopes A, et al. Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra maxillary. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7:267–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maló P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. Extramaxillary surgical technique: clinical outcome of 352 patients rehabilitated with 747 zygomatic implants with a follow-up between 6 months and 7 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:e153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migliorança R, Ilg JP, Serrano AS, et al. Sinus exteriorization of the zygoma fixtures: a new surgical protocol. Implant News. 2006;3:30–5. [in Portuguese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliorança RM, Zamperlini MS, Mayo TM, et al. All-on-four híbrido e all-on-four zigoma. In: Migliorança RM, Coppede AR, editors. Reabilitando maxilas atróficas edentulas sem enxertos ósseos. 1st ed. Sao Paulo: Quintessence; 2008. p. 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliorança RM, Copped A, Dias Rezende RC, et al. Restoration of the edentulous maxilla using extra-sinus zygomatic implants combined with anterior conventional implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:665–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Migliorança RM, Sotto-Maior BS, Senna PM, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of extrasinus zygomatic implants: a prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 8 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1072–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozzati M, Monfrin SB, Pedretti G, et al. Immediate loading of maxillary fixed prostheses retained by zygomatic and conventional implants: 24-month preliminary data for a series of clinical case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:308–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mozzati M, Mortellaro C, Arata V, et al. Rehabilitation with 4 zygomatic implants with a new surgical protocol using ultrasonic technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:722–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai H, Okazaki Y, Ueda M. Clinical application of zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:566–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parel SM, Brånemark PI, Ohrnell LO, et al. Remote implant anchorage for rehabilitation of maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peñarrocha M, Uribe R, García B, et al. Zygomatic implants using the sinus slot technique: clinical report of a patient series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:788–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peñarrocha M, García B, Martí E, et al. Rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae with fixed implant-supported prostheses using zygomatic implants placed using the sinus slot technique: clinical report on a series of 21 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:645–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, et al. Palatal positioning of implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:527–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pi-Urgell J, Revilla-Gutiérrez V, Gay-Escoda CG. Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E363–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori EM, Padovan LE, de Mattias Sartori IA, et al. Evaluation of satisfaction of patients rehabilitated with zygomatic fixtures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:314–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stella JP, Warner MR. Sinus slot technique for simplification and improved orientation of zygomaticus dental implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:889–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson AR, Austin BW. Zygomaticus fixtures: the Sidney experience. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000;15:337–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stievenart M, Malevez C. Rehabilitation of totally atrophied maxilla by means of four zygomatic implants and fixed prosthesis: a 6-40-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:358–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takamaru N, Nagai H, Ohe G, et al. Measurement of the zygomatic bone and pilot hole technique for safer insertion of zygomaticus implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45:104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura H, Sasaki K, Watahiki R. Primary insertion of implants in the zygomatic bone following subtotal maxillectomy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2000;41:21–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuminelli FJ, Walter LR, Neugarten J, et al. Immediate loading of zygomatic implants: a systematic review of implant survival, prosthesis survival and potential complications. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(Suppl 1):79–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, et al. Image-based planning and clinical validation of the zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weischer T, Schettler D, Mohr C. Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:211–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widmark G, Andersson B, Carlsson GE, et al. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: a 3 to 5-year follow-up clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:73–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Wu X. A quantitative study of the human zygomatic bone using the three-dimensional coordinate instrument. Chin J Orthod. 2001;8:55–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Peñarrocha-Oltra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peñarrocha-Diago, M., Aizcorbe-Vicente, J., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Migliorança, R.M., Serra-Pastor, B., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D. (2019). Immediate Loading in Atrophic Jaws: Zygomatic Implants. In: Peñarrocha-Diago, M., Covani, U., Cuadrado, L. (eds) Atlas of Immediate Dental Implant Loading. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05546-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05546-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05544-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05546-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics