Skip to main content

Measuring Mobilities of Care, a Challenge for Transport Agendas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Gender into Transport Planning

Abstract

This chapter proposes a methodology for accurately measuring daily travel associated with care tasks: activities performed by adults for children and other dependants, and the maintenance of the home. These activities are statistically performed by women, often as unpaid work. The travel associated with these tasks is not well described in the transport literature and is still less considered by transport policy agendas. We build the methodological framework for measuring this kind of travel around the innovative concept of mobility of care (Sánchez de Madariaga, Transporte metropolitano y grupos sociales: propuestas para una mejor planificación. Madrid: Ministry of Infrastructure, 2009, Schiebinger et al. Gender innovations in science, health and medicine, engineering and environment (launched 2011: genderinnovations.stanford.edu), 2013), which provides an umbrella category for the design of transport statistics that takes into account gender dimensions in urban transport. The chapter further provides an empirical study that applies this methodology to analyse the daily mobility of women and men aged 30–45 years in the metropolitan region of Madrid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This study analysed gender biases in the four main Spanish transportation surveys: Movilia, conducted at the national level by the Ministry of Infrastructure, which includes data from all metropolitan areas (Ministerio de Fomento 2007); two surveys conducted by the regional government of Catalonia (Generalitat de Catalunya 2006), and one conducted by the regional government of Madrid (Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid 2004; Sánchez de Madariaga 2009).

  2. 2.

    The previous research showing the innovative concept mobility of care has been showcased as a case study in the EU–US project Gendered Innovations http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies/transportation.html. This project provides analytical methods and case studies on how to introduce gender dimensions into the content of research in technological and medical fields. The design of this methodology and its application to the region of Madrid is a result of the PhD dissertation by Elena Zucchini (2016): “Género y transporte: análisis de la movilidad del cuidado como punto de partida para construir una base de conocimiento más amplia de los patrones de movilidad. El caso de Madrid”, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, supervised by Inés Sánchez de Madariaga.

  3. 3.

    On the issue of gender bias in research and how to counteract it, see the Gendered Innovations Project mentioned above.

References

  • Audirac, I. (2008). Universal design and accessible transit systems: Facts to consider when updating or expanding your transit system. Washington, DC: Project Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylina, M. (1996). Metodología cualitativa y estudios de geografía y género [Qualitative methodologies and studies in gender geography]. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Seguin, A.-M., & Bussiere, Y. (1997). Household structure and mobility patterns of women in O-D surveys: Methods and results based on the case studies of Montreal and Paris. In Women’s travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference, October 1996, FHWA, US Department of Transportation, TRB, pp. 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumen, I. (1994). Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography, 15(3), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, E. (2016). Why low-income women in the US still need automobiles. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bofill Levi, A., Dumenjó Martí, R.-M., & Segura Soriano, I. (1988). Las Mujeres y la ciudad manual de recomendaciones para una concepción del entorno habitado desde el punto de vista del género. Barcelona: Fundació Maria Aurelia Capmany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., & Tisdell, C. (2002). Gender and differences in travel life cycles. Journal of Travel Research, 41, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid. (2004). Encuesta de movilidad de Madrid EDM. Madrid: Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1970). Attitude and no attitudes: Continuation of a dialog. In E. Tafte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R. (2007). Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Transport. (2000). Women and public transport: The checklist. London: DETR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration FHA. (1996, 2009, 2011). Research on women’s issues in transportation. Conference proceedings. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender Equality Unit. (2004). How to incorporate gender equality into infrastructure, housing, transport, urban development, youth services. Factsheets reports 2000 04. London: NDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Generalitat de Catalunya. (2006). Enquesta de mobilitat quotidiana (EMQ06) Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepken, F. (2002). Como incorporar una perspectiva de género en la practica corriente del planeamiento, in Sánchez de MAdariaga I. (Dir) Segundo Seminario Internacional de Género y Urbanismo, Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P., Kumar, A., & Richardson, W. (1989). Gender differences in metropolitan travel. Regional Studies, 23(6), 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greed, C., Devis, L., Brown, C., & Dure, S. (2003). Gender equality and plan making. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, M., & McQuaid, R. (2012). Special issue gender and transport: Transaction costs, competing claims and transport policy gaps. Research in Transportation Economics, 34, 1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, M., Pickup, L., & Whipp, R. (1989). Gender and transport: Employment and the impact of travel constraints. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiliano, G. (1979). Public transportation and the travel needs of women. Traffic Quarterly, 33(4), 607–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (1999). Women and transport: Disadvantage and the gender divide. Town and Country Planning, 68(10), 318–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., Jenkins, L., Hodgson, F., & Turner, J. (2005). Promoting gender equality in transport. Working Paper Series, no. 34. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (1980a). The importance of multi-purpose journey to work in urban travel behavior. Transportation, 9, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (1980b). Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: Implications for choice theory. Geographical Analysis, 12(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work and space. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2016). Harmonized European Time Use Survey (HETUS). Prepared tables, main activities (2-digit level) by sex and country. Eurostat http://www.h2.scb.se/tus/tus/.

  • Ilárraz, I. (2006). Movilidad sostenible y equidad de género, Zerbitzuan Journal, 40, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2016). A gendered view of mobility and transport. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 547–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., Holm, K., & Hubner, P. (1976). Introduction to empirical sociology. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor of London. (2004). Expanding horizons: Transport for London’s women’s action plan: London: Mayor of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin, N., & Murakami, E. (2005). Examining trip-chaining behavior: A comparison of men and women. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuckin, N., & Nakamoto, Y. (2005). Differences in trip chaining by men and women. In United States National Research Council (Ed.), Research on women’s issues in transportation report of a conference, Vol. II: Technical papers. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office (GPO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Fomento. (2007). Encuesta de Movilidad de las Personas Residentes. Movilia 2006. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., & Shemilt, I. (2003). Working fathers: Earning and caring. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J., & Charlton, J. (2011). Gender differences in attitudes to and mobility impacts of driving cessation. In S. Herbel & D. Gaines (Eds.), Women’s issues in transportation: Summary of the fourth international conference, 27–30 October 2009, Irvine, CA (Vol. 2, pp. 64–73). Washington, DC: United States National Research Council (NRC) Transportation Research Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup, L. (1985). Women’s gender-role and its influence on travel behavior. Built Environment, 10, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup, L. (1988). Hard to get around: A study of women’s travel mobility. In J. Little, L. Peake, & P. Richardson (Eds.), Women in cities: Gender and the urban environment. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, M. (1996). Swedish men and women’s mobility patterns: Issues of social equality and ecological sustainability. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway. Administration, Washington DC, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/womens/chap11.pdf

  • Rohmer, H. (2007). Gender mainstreaming European transport research and policy: Building the knowledge base and mapping good practices. Available at http://koensforskning.soc.ku.dk/projekter/transgen/

  • Root, A., Schintler, L., & Button, K. (2000). Women, travel and the idea of sustainable transport. Transport Reviews, 20(3), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (1989). Trip chaining behaviour: A comparative and cross cultural analysis of the travel patterns of working mothers. In M. Grieco, L. Pickup, & R. Whipp (Eds.), Gender, transport and employment. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (1993). Women’s travel patterns at various stages of their lives. In C. Katz & J. Monk (Eds.), Full circles: Geographies of women over the life course. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (1995). Travel by women. In Federal Highway Administration, nationwide personal transportation survey, Demographic Special Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (1996). Women’s travel issues in Federal Highway Administration Women Travel Issues, Proceedings from the second national conference. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (1998). Trends in women’s travel patterns. Berkeley: The University of California Transportation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S., & Burns, E. (1993). Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson (Arizona). Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2004). Urbanismo con perspectiva de género. Sevilla: Fondo Social Europeo - Junta de Andalucía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2009). Transporte metropolitano y grupos sociales: propuestas para una mejor planificación. Report for CEDEX. Madrid: Ministry of Infrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2010). Housing, mobility and planning for equality in diversity: Cities, gender and dependence. In VVAA social housing and city (pp. 177–197). Madrid: Ministerio de Vivienda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013a). From women in transport to gender in transport: Challenging conceptual frameworks for improved policy making. Journal of International Affairs, 67, 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013b). The mobility of care: Introducing new concepts in urban transportation. In I. Sánchez de Madariaga & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Neuman, M. (2016). Mainstreaming gender in the city. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L., Klinge, I., Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Schraudner, M. (Eds.). (2013). Gender innovations in science, health and medicine, engineering and environment (launched 2011: genderinnovations.stanford.edu).

  • Schultz, D., & Gilbert, S. (1996). Women and transit security: A new look at an old issue. Proceedings of the Women’s Travel Issues Second National Conference, 25–27 October, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiewe, M. (2012). Gender and mobility: Everyday mobility during changing gender relations. In 26th AESOP annual congress, 11–15 July, Ankara: Association of European Schools of Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Road Administration (SRA). (2009). The road transport sector: Sectoral report 2008. Stockholm: SRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Road Administration (SRA). (2010). The road transport sector: Sectoral report 2009. Stockholm: SRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transport for London. (2007). Gender equality scheme. London: Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board. (2004, 2009, 2011). Research on women’s issues in transportation conference: Report of conference proceedings, TRB, Washington, DC Transportation Research Board of the US National Academies, http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164708.aspx

  • Turner, J., & Grieco, M. (1998). Gender and time poverty: The neglected social policy implications of gender for time, transport and travel. Paper presented at International Conference on Time Use. Luneberg: University of Luneberg. http://www.geocities.com/margaret_grieco/womenont/time/.html

  • Turner J., Hamilton K., & Spitzner M. (2006). Women and transport report. Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, F. (2013). Choreography of life. In I. Sánchez de Madariaga & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe. London/New York: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Labour Statistics. (2011). American time use survey: 2010 results. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Federal Highway Administration. (2009). National household travel survey (NHTS): Summary of travel and trends. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office (GPO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uteng, T., & Cresswell, T. (Eds.). (2008). Gendered mobilities. New York: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekerle, G. (1992). A working guide to planning and designing safer cities. Toronto: City of Toronto Planning and Development Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wekerle, G., & Rutherford, B. (1987). Employed women in the suburbs: Transportation disadvantage in a car-centered environment. Alternatives: Perspectives on Society, Technology, and Environment, 14(3–4), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inés Sánchez de Madariaga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Madariaga, I.S., Zucchini, E. (2019). Measuring Mobilities of Care, a Challenge for Transport Agendas. In: Scholten, C.L., Joelsson, T. (eds) Integrating Gender into Transport Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05041-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics