Abstract
This chapter proposes a methodology for accurately measuring daily travel associated with care tasks: activities performed by adults for children and other dependants, and the maintenance of the home. These activities are statistically performed by women, often as unpaid work. The travel associated with these tasks is not well described in the transport literature and is still less considered by transport policy agendas. We build the methodological framework for measuring this kind of travel around the innovative concept of mobility of care (Sánchez de Madariaga, Transporte metropolitano y grupos sociales: propuestas para una mejor planificación. Madrid: Ministry of Infrastructure, 2009, Schiebinger et al. Gender innovations in science, health and medicine, engineering and environment (launched 2011: genderinnovations.stanford.edu), 2013), which provides an umbrella category for the design of transport statistics that takes into account gender dimensions in urban transport. The chapter further provides an empirical study that applies this methodology to analyse the daily mobility of women and men aged 30–45 years in the metropolitan region of Madrid.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This study analysed gender biases in the four main Spanish transportation surveys: Movilia, conducted at the national level by the Ministry of Infrastructure, which includes data from all metropolitan areas (Ministerio de Fomento 2007); two surveys conducted by the regional government of Catalonia (Generalitat de Catalunya 2006), and one conducted by the regional government of Madrid (Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid 2004; Sánchez de Madariaga 2009).
- 2.
The previous research showing the innovative concept mobility of care has been showcased as a case study in the EU–US project Gendered Innovations http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/case-studies/transportation.html. This project provides analytical methods and case studies on how to introduce gender dimensions into the content of research in technological and medical fields. The design of this methodology and its application to the region of Madrid is a result of the PhD dissertation by Elena Zucchini (2016): “Género y transporte: análisis de la movilidad del cuidado como punto de partida para construir una base de conocimiento más amplia de los patrones de movilidad. El caso de Madrid”, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, supervised by Inés Sánchez de Madariaga.
- 3.
On the issue of gender bias in research and how to counteract it, see the Gendered Innovations Project mentioned above.
References
Audirac, I. (2008). Universal design and accessible transit systems: Facts to consider when updating or expanding your transit system. Washington, DC: Project Action.
Baylina, M. (1996). Metodología cualitativa y estudios de geografía y género [Qualitative methodologies and studies in gender geography]. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Departament de Geografía.
Bernard, A., Seguin, A.-M., & Bussiere, Y. (1997). Household structure and mobility patterns of women in O-D surveys: Methods and results based on the case studies of Montreal and Paris. In Women’s travel issues: Proceedings from the second national conference, October 1996, FHWA, US Department of Transportation, TRB, pp. 249–266.
Blumen, I. (1994). Gender differences in the journey to work. Urban Geography, 15(3), 223–245.
Blumenberg, E. (2016). Why low-income women in the US still need automobiles. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 525–545.
Bofill Levi, A., Dumenjó Martí, R.-M., & Segura Soriano, I. (1988). Las Mujeres y la ciudad manual de recomendaciones para una concepción del entorno habitado desde el punto de vista del género. Barcelona: Fundació Maria Aurelia Capmany.
Collins, D., & Tisdell, C. (2002). Gender and differences in travel life cycles. Journal of Travel Research, 41, 133–143.
Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid. (2004). Encuesta de movilidad de Madrid EDM. Madrid: Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid.
Converse, P. (1970). Attitude and no attitudes: Continuation of a dialog. In E. Tafte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Crane, R. (2007). Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), 298–316.
Department for Transport. (2000). Women and public transport: The checklist. London: DETR.
Federal Highway Administration FHA. (1996, 2009, 2011). Research on women’s issues in transportation. Conference proceedings. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.
Gender Equality Unit. (2004). How to incorporate gender equality into infrastructure, housing, transport, urban development, youth services. Factsheets reports 2000 04. London: NDP.
Generalitat de Catalunya. (2006). Enquesta de mobilitat quotidiana (EMQ06) Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya.
Gepken, F. (2002). Como incorporar una perspectiva de género en la practica corriente del planeamiento, in Sánchez de MAdariaga I. (Dir) Segundo Seminario Internacional de Género y Urbanismo, Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Gordon, P., Kumar, A., & Richardson, W. (1989). Gender differences in metropolitan travel. Regional Studies, 23(6), 499–510.
Greed, C., Devis, L., Brown, C., & Dure, S. (2003). Gender equality and plan making. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.
Grieco, M., & McQuaid, R. (2012). Special issue gender and transport: Transaction costs, competing claims and transport policy gaps. Research in Transportation Economics, 34, 1–86.
Grieco, M., Pickup, L., & Whipp, R. (1989). Gender and transport: Employment and the impact of travel constraints. Aldershot: Avebury.
Guiliano, G. (1979). Public transportation and the travel needs of women. Traffic Quarterly, 33(4), 607–616.
Hamilton, K. (1999). Women and transport: Disadvantage and the gender divide. Town and Country Planning, 68(10), 318–319.
Hamilton, K., Jenkins, L., Hodgson, F., & Turner, J. (2005). Promoting gender equality in transport. Working Paper Series, no. 34. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
Hanson, S. (1980a). The importance of multi-purpose journey to work in urban travel behavior. Transportation, 9, 229–248.
Hanson, S. (1980b). Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: Implications for choice theory. Geographical Analysis, 12(3), 245–257.
Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work and space. New York: Routledge.
Eurostat. (2016). Harmonized European Time Use Survey (HETUS). Prepared tables, main activities (2-digit level) by sex and country. Eurostat http://www.h2.scb.se/tus/tus/.
Ilárraz, I. (2006). Movilidad sostenible y equidad de género, Zerbitzuan Journal, 40, 61–66.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2016). A gendered view of mobility and transport. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 547–565.
Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.
Mayntz, R., Holm, K., & Hubner, P. (1976). Introduction to empirical sociology. London: Penguin.
Mayor of London. (2004). Expanding horizons: Transport for London’s women’s action plan: London: Mayor of London.
McGuckin, N., & Murakami, E. (2005). Examining trip-chaining behavior: A comparison of men and women. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation.
McGuckin, N., & Nakamoto, Y. (2005). Differences in trip chaining by men and women. In United States National Research Council (Ed.), Research on women’s issues in transportation report of a conference, Vol. II: Technical papers. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office (GPO).
Ministerio de Fomento. (2007). Encuesta de Movilidad de las Personas Residentes. Movilia 2006. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento.
O’Brien, M., & Shemilt, I. (2003). Working fathers: Earning and caring. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
Oxley, J., & Charlton, J. (2011). Gender differences in attitudes to and mobility impacts of driving cessation. In S. Herbel & D. Gaines (Eds.), Women’s issues in transportation: Summary of the fourth international conference, 27–30 October 2009, Irvine, CA (Vol. 2, pp. 64–73). Washington, DC: United States National Research Council (NRC) Transportation Research Board.
Pickup, L. (1985). Women’s gender-role and its influence on travel behavior. Built Environment, 10, 61–68.
Pickup, L. (1988). Hard to get around: A study of women’s travel mobility. In J. Little, L. Peake, & P. Richardson (Eds.), Women in cities: Gender and the urban environment. New York: New York University Press.
Polk, M. (1996). Swedish men and women’s mobility patterns: Issues of social equality and ecological sustainability. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway. Administration, Washington DC, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/womens/chap11.pdf
Rohmer, H. (2007). Gender mainstreaming European transport research and policy: Building the knowledge base and mapping good practices. Available at http://koensforskning.soc.ku.dk/projekter/transgen/
Root, A., Schintler, L., & Button, K. (2000). Women, travel and the idea of sustainable transport. Transport Reviews, 20(3), 369–383.
Rosenbloom, S. (1989). Trip chaining behaviour: A comparative and cross cultural analysis of the travel patterns of working mothers. In M. Grieco, L. Pickup, & R. Whipp (Eds.), Gender, transport and employment. Aldershot: Avebury.
Rosenbloom, S. (1993). Women’s travel patterns at various stages of their lives. In C. Katz & J. Monk (Eds.), Full circles: Geographies of women over the life course. London: Routledge.
Rosenbloom, S. (1995). Travel by women. In Federal Highway Administration, nationwide personal transportation survey, Demographic Special Reports.
Rosenbloom, S. (1996). Women’s travel issues in Federal Highway Administration Women Travel Issues, Proceedings from the second national conference. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.
Rosenbloom, S. (1998). Trends in women’s travel patterns. Berkeley: The University of California Transportation Center.
Rosenbloom, S., & Burns, E. (1993). Gender differences in commuter travel in Tucson (Arizona). Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2004). Urbanismo con perspectiva de género. Sevilla: Fondo Social Europeo - Junta de Andalucía.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2009). Transporte metropolitano y grupos sociales: propuestas para una mejor planificación. Report for CEDEX. Madrid: Ministry of Infrastructure.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2010). Housing, mobility and planning for equality in diversity: Cities, gender and dependence. In VVAA social housing and city (pp. 177–197). Madrid: Ministerio de Vivienda.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013a). From women in transport to gender in transport: Challenging conceptual frameworks for improved policy making. Journal of International Affairs, 67, 43–66.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013b). The mobility of care: Introducing new concepts in urban transportation. In I. Sánchez de Madariaga & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Neuman, M. (2016). Mainstreaming gender in the city. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 493–504.
Schiebinger, L., Klinge, I., Sánchez de Madariaga, I., & Schraudner, M. (Eds.). (2013). Gender innovations in science, health and medicine, engineering and environment (launched 2011: genderinnovations.stanford.edu).
Schultz, D., & Gilbert, S. (1996). Women and transit security: A new look at an old issue. Proceedings of the Women’s Travel Issues Second National Conference, 25–27 October, Baltimore.
Stiewe, M. (2012). Gender and mobility: Everyday mobility during changing gender relations. In 26th AESOP annual congress, 11–15 July, Ankara: Association of European Schools of Planning.
Swedish Road Administration (SRA). (2009). The road transport sector: Sectoral report 2008. Stockholm: SRA.
Swedish Road Administration (SRA). (2010). The road transport sector: Sectoral report 2009. Stockholm: SRA.
Transport for London. (2007). Gender equality scheme. London: Group Publishing.
Transportation Research Board. (2004, 2009, 2011). Research on women’s issues in transportation conference: Report of conference proceedings, TRB, Washington, DC Transportation Research Board of the US National Academies, http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164708.aspx
Turner, J., & Grieco, M. (1998). Gender and time poverty: The neglected social policy implications of gender for time, transport and travel. Paper presented at International Conference on Time Use. Luneberg: University of Luneberg. http://www.geocities.com/margaret_grieco/womenont/time/.html
Turner J., Hamilton K., & Spitzner M. (2006). Women and transport report. Brussels: European Parliament.
Ullmann, F. (2013). Choreography of life. In I. Sánchez de Madariaga & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe. London/New York: Ashgate.
United States Bureau of Labour Statistics. (2011). American time use survey: 2010 results. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labour.
United States Federal Highway Administration. (2009). National household travel survey (NHTS): Summary of travel and trends. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office (GPO).
Uteng, T., & Cresswell, T. (Eds.). (2008). Gendered mobilities. New York: Ashgate.
Wekerle, G. (1992). A working guide to planning and designing safer cities. Toronto: City of Toronto Planning and Development Department.
Wekerle, G., & Rutherford, B. (1987). Employed women in the suburbs: Transportation disadvantage in a car-centered environment. Alternatives: Perspectives on Society, Technology, and Environment, 14(3–4), 49–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Madariaga, I.S., Zucchini, E. (2019). Measuring Mobilities of Care, a Challenge for Transport Agendas. In: Scholten, C.L., Joelsson, T. (eds) Integrating Gender into Transport Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05041-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)