Skip to main content

Palliative Care and the Common Good

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Palliative Care and Catholic Health Care

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 130))

  • 285 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to connect a relatively concrete and specific form of medical intervention—palliative care—to the relatively abstract and expansive concept of the common good. In doing so it explores the relationship of a Catholic conception of the common good to other central commitments and principles within Catholic social thought. These principles and commitments include: the social nature of persons, justice, the preferential option for the poor, and solidarity. The chapter concludes with a discussion of palliative care, drawing connections between a commitment to the common good and the provision of adequate levels of palliative care for all of those who need it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Randall and Downie (2006) suggest the administration of palliative care can be traced back to Greek practices that pre-date Hippocrates.

  2. 2.

    While it is true that “modern” political philosophies (those associated with the Enlightenment period forward) have tended to stress the rights of the individual over and against the demands of the common good, it is also true that some more recent political philosophers (e.g., the work of Michael Sandel, Martha Nussbaum, and Alasdair McIntyre) have begun to retrieve conceptions of the common good, conceptions that often stress that the good of individuals (and the protections of their rights) are not incompatible with a robust defense of the common good.

  3. 3.

    Aquinas (1945) argued that the good to be sought by all is the uncreated Good (God) : “The supreme good, God, is the common good, since the good of all things depends on God.”

  4. 4.

    Other goods understood to be social or public goods include “the fertility of hearth, the productivity of an industrialized economy,” as well as social insurance programs (Hollenbach 1990).

  5. 5.

    Within the Catholic tradition the first explicit development of this theme occurred in the Final Document of the Third General Conference of Latin American Bishops, which included a chapter titled “The Preferential Option for the Poor .” There, the Latin American Bishops call attention to the fact that “the vast majority of our people lack the most elementary material goods. This is in contrast to the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a small minority , frequently the price being poverty for the majority. The poor do not lack simply material goods. They also miss, on the level of human dignity , full participation in sociopolitical life” (Consejo Episcopal Latinoamericano 1979).

  6. 6.

    Between 2002 and 2012, the average cost for employer-sponsored family health coverage rose 97% to $15,700 per year, a rate of increase equal to three times the rate of inflation (The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, “Family Health Premiums Rise,” 2012a). Observing this rapid increase in the cost of health care insurance, the New America Foundation suggested (in 2008) that the average cost of an employee-sponsored health insurance plan would reach $24,000 in 2016, an amount they noted would mean that “at least half of American households will need to spend more than 45% of their income to buy health insurance” in that year (Axeen and Carpenter 2008).

  7. 7.

    The US spent 48% more per capita than the next highest spending country, Switzerland.

  8. 8.

    As President Bush left office, there were an estimated 46.3 million Americans lacking health insurance (DeNavas-Walt et al. 2009). And, as the Great Recession deepened, that number climbed to over 50 million.

  9. 9.

    Of course, these African-American and Hispanic patients are not alone in shunning palliative care even when it is the most appropriate intervention. As Ron Hamel has pointed out, if palliative treatments, when called for, are to be adopted with greater frequency, they need to be supported by a cultural shift in how Americans (and others) approach death. This will be a challenge since as “a society, we do not do well dealing with our mortality even in the abstract, let alone when confronted with a relatively imminent threat of our demise. We deny and fight against death with every fiber of our being and enlist medicine in the effort” (2011).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bailey, J.P. (2019). Palliative Care and the Common Good. In: Cataldo, P., O’Brien, D. (eds) Palliative Care and Catholic Health Care . Philosophy and Medicine, vol 130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05005-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics