Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Assessment and Diagnosis of “Mental Abnormalities,” Personality Disorders, and Psychopathy in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sexually Violent Predators: A Clinical Science Handbook

Abstract

The assessment and diagnosis of “mental abnormalities,” personality disorders, and psychopathy are fraught with pitfalls. These pitfalls are both theoretical and pragmatic in nature. Problems include errors in the measurement of psychological constructs, mismatches between psychological constructs and psychological definitions, poorly defined psycholegal terms, different definitions and applications of psycholegal terms across jurisdictions, and malleability of personality traits across the lifespan. We discuss this assortment of problems and review the body of research regarding the nature and assessment of these constructs in an effort to inform best practices regarding sexually violent predator evaluations. Such evaluations are intended to result in outcomes that increase public safety by containing dangerous individuals. We highlight the importance of primary and tertiary prevention of sexual (re)offending in increasing public safety. Regarding tertiary prevention, individuals convicted of sexual offenses are commonly mandated to participate in sex-offender-specific treatment and aftercare. Such treatment programs are often “one size fits all” in content. Paul (J Consult Psychol 31:104–118, 1967) suggested that an important question for psychotherapy outcome researchers to address is the following: “What treatment, by whom, is most effective for this individual with that specific problem, and under which set of circumstances?” The answer to this question for individuals displaying severe sexual behavior problems (i.e., SVPs) remains substantially unaddressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ross and Nisbett (1991) provide a scholarly, yet reader-friendly, discussion of this debate.

References

  • Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Wygant, D. B., Salekin, R. T., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Examining the associations between DSM-5 section III antisocial personality disorder traits and psychopathy in community and university samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 675–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, D. S., Dolan, R. T., Skodol, A. E., Sanislow, C. A., Dyck, I. R., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2001). Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. D., & Ebaugh, F. G. (1938). The diagnostic validity of the Rorschach test. American Journal of Psychiatry, 94, 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E. (1966). Some implications of psychotherapy research for therapeutic practice. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, J., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (2017). Examining the interrater reliability of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised across a large sample of trained raters. Psychological Assessment, 29, 762–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Rufino, K. A., & Gardner, B. O. (2014). Evaluator differences in Psychopathy Checklist-Revised factor and facet scores. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buntins, M., Buntins, K., & Eggert, F. (2016). Psychological tests from a (fuzzy-)logical point of view. Quality & Quantity, 50, 2395–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0268-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., Shapiro, J. L., Daly, E., Vanderbleek, E. N., Oiler, M. R., & Harrison, J. (in press). Empirically validated diagnostic and assessment methods. In W. J. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders, Second edition. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2014). Schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality—2nd edition (SNAP-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., Michie, C. (2004). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality-institutional rating scale (CAPP-IRS). Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Logan, C. (2018). Capturing psychopathic personality: Penetrating the mask of sanity through clinical interview. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 189–210). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. J., Koldobsky, N., Mulder, R., & Tyrer, P. (2011). Classifying personality disorder according to severity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranowski, J. M., Frank, E., Winter, E., Rucci, P., Novick, D., Pilkonis, P., et al. (2004). Personality pathology and outcome in recurrently depressed women over 2 years of maintenance interpersonal psychotherapy. Psychological Medicine, 34, 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 (Version 3): Assessing risk for violence. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feske, U., Mulsant, B. H., Pilkonis, P. A., Soloff, P., Dolata, D., Sackeim, H. A., et al. (2004). Clinical outcome of ECT in patients with major depression and comorbid borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2073–2080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feske, U., Perry, K. J., Chambless, D. L., Renneberg, B., & Goldstein, A. J. (1996). Avoidant personality disorder as a predictor for treatment outcome among generalized social phobics. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders: SCID-II. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowensmith, W. N., Sessarego, S. N., McKee, M. K., Horkott, S., MacLean, N., & McCallum, K. E. (2017). Diagnostic field reliability in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 29, 692–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G., & Ridolfi, M. E. (2001). Borderline personality disorder. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 932, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., Hart, S. D., & Harpur, T. J. (1991). Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22, 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, properties, debates, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 39–79). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. B., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2015). Rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. The Journal of Psychology, 10, 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C., & Thomas, K. M. (2012). Personality disorders. In M. Hersen & D. C. Beidel (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (6th ed., pp. 681–716). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C. J., & Sellbom, M. (2013). Implications of DSM-5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and Law, 6, 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse, 19(4), 425–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F. (2013). Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzenweger, M. F. (2008). Epidemiology of personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., & Widows, M. (2005). Professional manual for the psychopathic personality inventory-revised (PPI-R). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loranger, A. W., Sartorius, N., Andreoli, A., Berger, P., Buchheim, P., Channabasavanna, S. M., et al. (1994). The international personality disorder examination: The World Health Organization/Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration international pilot study of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattia, J. I., & Zimmerman, M. (2001). Epidemiology. In W. Livesley (Ed.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 107–123). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurran, M., & Howard, R. (Eds.). (2009). Personality, personality disorder and violence. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. S., Kimonis, E. R., Otto, R. K., Kline, S. M., & Wasserman, A. L. (2012). Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings. Psychological Assessment, 24, 944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory’s nomological network: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory – IV. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokros, A., Habermeyer, E., & Kuchenhoff, H. (2017). The uncertainty of psychological and psychiatric diagnoses. Psychological Assessment, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., Mulvey, E. P., Roth, L. H., et al. (2006). The classification of violence risk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 721–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, T. M., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1406–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey Sexually Violent Predator Act (1998), N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.24 to -27.38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. L. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, L., Kunz, C., Rasmussen, K., & Elsass, P. (2010). Psychopathy as a risk factor for violent recidivism: Investigating the Psychopathy Checklist Screening Version (PCL: SV) and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) in a forensic psychiatric setting. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. C. (1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, B., Blum, N., & Zimmerman, M. (1997). Structured interview for DSM-IV personality: SIDP-IV. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentky, R. A., Barbaree, H. E., & Janus, E. S. (2015). Sexual predators: Society, risk, and the law. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, A. M., Hansen, A. L., Kristensen, M. V., Johnsen, B. H., Logan, C., & Thornton, D. (2012). Assessment of psychopathy: Inter-correlations between psychopathy checklist revised, comprehensive assessment of psychopathic personality–institutional rating scale, and self-report of psychopathy scale–III. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanislow, C. A., & McGlashan, T. H. (1998). Treatment outcome of personality disorders. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Fowler, K., & McCrary, K. L. (2018). Self-report assessment of psychopathy: Challenges, pitfalls, and promises. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (2nd ed., pp. 211–258). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skodol, A. E., Siever, L. J., Livesley, W. J., Gunderson, J. G., Pfohl, B., & Widiger, T. A. (2002). The borderline diagnosis II: Biology, genetics, and clinical course. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 951–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soloff, P. H., Lis, J. A., Kelly, T., Cornelius, J., & Ulrich, R. (1994). Risk factors for suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1316–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. H. (1993). Abnormalities of personality: Within and beyond the realm of treatment. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Boldness explains a key difference between psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000). Toward DSM—V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 946–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., Corbitt, E. M., Ellis, C. R., Mangine, S., & Thomas, G. V. (1995). Personality disorder interview–IV. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilberg, T., Hummelen, B., Pedersen, G., & Karterud, S. (2008). A study of patients with personality disorder not otherwise specified. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49, 460–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Sleep, C. E., Wall, T. D., Applegate, K. C., Krueger, R. F., et al. (2016). Examining the DSM–5 alternative personality disorder model operationalization of antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in a male correctional sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Sickel, A. E., & Yong, L. (1996). The diagnostic interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (DIPD-IV). Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Martin Sellbom

  2. Special Psychological Services, L.L.C, Bloomfield, NJ, USA

    Daniel S. Bromberg

Authors
  1. Martin Sellbom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel S. Bromberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Sellbom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA

    William T. O’Donohue

  2. Special Psychological Services, LLC, Bloomfield, NJ, USA

    Daniel S. Bromberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sellbom, M., Bromberg, D.S. (2019). The Assessment and Diagnosis of “Mental Abnormalities,” Personality Disorders, and Psychopathy in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations. In: O’Donohue, W.T., Bromberg, D.S. (eds) Sexually Violent Predators: A Clinical Science Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation