Skip to main content

The Effect of Load Ratio on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Type 304 Stainless Steels in Air and High Temperature Deaerated Water at 482 °F

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water Reactors

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 3102 Accesses

Abstract

A test program has been completed that re-examined the effect of load ratio, R, on fatigue crack growth rates (FCGRs) of austenitic stainless steel in 482 °F air and deaerated water. Data for the test program were collected at R between 0.1 and 0.95 and ΔK values between 2.5 and 50 ksi√in to ensure an overlapping dataset in R and ∆K. In contrast to the single Paris slope relationship in the ASME code, results from air tests revealed a three-regime curve across many R: a high ΔK regime similar to ASME, an intermediate ΔK regime with a decreased power law exponent and a low ΔK region where FCGR exhibit a steep downturn. Water FCGRs showed two regimes—a single power law regime and a steep low ΔK regime. FCGR sensitivity to R was greatest in the low ΔK regime for both environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.A. James, D.P. Jones, Fatigue Crack Growth Correlations for Austenitic Stainless Steels in Air. Predict. Capab. Environ. Assist. Crack. ASME PVP 99, 363–414 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Code, Section XI, Division 1, Appendix C, Section C-8400, Fatigue Crack Growth Rate, 2007, pp. 381–383

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.L. Wire, W.J. Mills, in Pressure vessel and piping codes and standards—2002, ASME PVP-Vol. 439, 2002, pp. 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.M. Evans, G.L. Wire, in Pressure vessel and piping codes and standards—2002, ASME PVP-Vol. 439, 2002, pp. 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.L. Wire, W.M. Evans, W.J. Mills, in Pressure vessel and piping codes and standards—2004, ASME PVP-Vol. 480, 2004, PVP2004-2675, pp. 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.L. Wire, W.M. Evans, W.J. Mills, in Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards2005, 2005, PVP2005-71608

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.R. Tice, K.M.S. Rigby, D.I. Swan, Corrosion fatigue crack growth of austenitic stainless steel in PWR primary coolant at low frequency, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fatigue of Reactor Components, Seville, Spain, Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Tice, N. Platts, K. Rigby, J. Stairmand, D. Swan, Influence of PWR primary coolant environment on corrosion fatigue crack growth of austenitic stainless steel, in Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards—2005, 2005, PVP2005-71563

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.R. Tice, N. Platts, K. Rigby, J.W. Stairmand, Influence of temperature and flow rate on the corrosion fatigue crack growth of austenitic stainless steels in a PWR primary coolant environment, in 13th International Conference on Environmental Degradation in Nuclear Power Systems, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada, Aug 2007

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Platts, D.R. Tice, J.W. Stairmand, Effect of flow rate on teh environmentally enhanced fatigue crack propagation of austenitic stainless steels in a simulated PWR primary coolant environment, in 14th International Conference on Environmental Degradation in Nuclear Power Systems, Virginia Beach, VA, Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Nomura, K. Tsutsumi, H. Kanasaki, N. Chigusa, K. Jotaki, H. Shimizu, T. Hirose, H. Ohata, PVP-Vol. 480, Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards–2004, ASME PVP2004-2674, 2004, pp. 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Nomura, K. Sakaguchi, H. Kanasaki, S. Suzuki, in 2006 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, 2006, PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93224

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.L. Bernard, G. Slama, C. Amzallag, P. Rabbe, Meeting on Time and Load Dependent Degradation of Pressure Boundary Materials, IWG-RRPC-79/2, 1979, IAEA, pp. 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.L. Andresen, C.L. Briant, Corrosion (1989), pp. 448–463

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.G. Ljunberg, D. Cubicciotti, M. Trolle, in Fourth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, 1990, NACE, pp. 459–475

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.J. Mills, Critical review of fatigue crack growth rates for stainless steel in deaerated water, in Presented at the EPRI Materials Reliability Program Conference, Session 9a, Colorado Springs, 28 June–1 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.C. Cipolla, W.H. Bamford, Technical basis for code case N-809 on reference fatigue crack growth curves for austenitic stainless steels in pressurized water reactor environments, in ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference—PVP 2015-45884, July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.H. Schwalbe, D. Hellmann, Application of the electrical potential method to crack length measurements using Johnson’s formula. J. Test. Eval. 9, 218 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.K. Donald, J. Ruschau, Direct current potential difference fatigue crack measurement techniques, in Fatigue Crack Measurement: Techniques and Applications, EMAS, 1991, p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.B. O’Brien, R.G. Ballinger, D.J. Paraventi, L. Yn, Y. Maruno, P.W. Stahle, The effect of environment, chemistry, and microstructure on the corrosion fatigue behavior of austenitic stainless steels in high temperature water, in 17th International Conference on Environmental Degradation in Nuclear Power Systems, 9–13 Aug 2015, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.A. West, H.M. Mohr, E. Lord, Fatigue threshold behavior of stainless steel in high temperature air and water, in Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, PVP2016, 17–21 July 2016, Vancouver, BC, Canada, PVP2016-63051

    Google Scholar 

  22. W.J. Mills, Accelerated and retarded corrosion fatigue crack growth rates for 304 stainless steel in an elevated temperature aqueous environment, in 16th International Conference on Environmental Degradation in Nuclear Power Systems, Asheville, NC, Aug 2013

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following organizations and their staff (past and present) are gratefully acknowledged: Naval Nuclear Laboratory—Bettis Advanced Materials Testing Laboratory, Mechanical Testing, and Welding Laboratory. This work is the result of the efforts started by and the insight of the late Dr. William J. Mills.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Paraventi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paraventi, D.J., Brown, C.M., O’Brien, L.B., McGraw, B.A. (2019). The Effect of Load Ratio on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of Type 304 Stainless Steels in Air and High Temperature Deaerated Water at 482 °F. In: Jackson, J., Paraventi, D., Wright, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water Reactors. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04639-2_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics