Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has taken off for a steadily fast development, as it enables design flexibility and capability of increasingly complex, highly personalized products with enhanced performance and functionality. More importantly, it is claimed to hold great potentials in improving sustainability . However, how to fulfill such potentials is weakly supported by the scattered research. To better outline, connect, and coordinate the efforts toward a sustainable future of additive manufacturing , a research framework with six successive parts is proposed. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a relatively mature and widely applied process. Considering its scale, the sustainability issues in FDM are first attended. To demonstrate how the proposed research framework is utilized, a life cycle energy analysis of FDM processes has been conducted, including filament production, FDM printing, post-processing, and auxiliary services. Three research projects are presented and performed with the guidance of research framework. The common motivation is to understand the energy characteristics, key influential factors, and energy -saving opportunities in the FDM printing processes. The topics are (1) how the key parameters influence the process energy consumption; (2) the relation between energy consumption and surface roughness using different printers; and (3) how to minimize the overall printing time, correspondingly printing energy , of a multi-component complex part. It is hoped that with the proposed research framework, the future studies on sustainability in additive manufacturing can be consistent and comparable, and the data integration and cross-disciplinary data analysis can be facilitated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org
United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals SDGs. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
Bundesministerium fur Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB) (2016) Klimaschutzplan 2050—Klimaschutzpolitische Grundsatze und Ziele der Bundesregierung. Berlin, Germany
Gupta K et al (2016) Recent developments in sustainable manufacturing of gears: a review. J Clean Prod 112(4):3320–3330
Hauschild M, Jeswiet J, Alting L (2005) From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):535–555
ASTM (2012) F2792-12a standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
Huang SH et al (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1191–1203
Reeves P (2008) Additive manufacturing—a supply chain wide response to economic uncertainty and environmental sustainbility. Econolyst Ltd., Derbyshire, UK
Gartner, Gartner, Inc. (2016) Hype cycle for 3D printing
RepRap (2008) Welcome to RepRap.org. 2008. Available from: http://reprap.org/
Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (2006) Rapid manufacturing. An industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley, Chischester, West Sussex, UK
Boschetto A, Bottini L (2016) Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 37:103–114
Wohlers T (2012) Wohlers report 2012: executive summary. Wohlers Associates Inc., Fort Collins
Wohlers T (2016) Wohlers report 2016: executive summary. Wohlers Associates Inc., Fort Collins
Peng T (2016) Analysis of energy utilization in 3D printing processes. Procedia CIRP 40:62–67
Huang Y et al (2015) Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations. J Manuf Sci Eng, Trans ASME 137(1):1–10 (014001)
Peng T, Sun W (2017) Energy modeling for FDM 3D printing from a life cycle perspective. Int J Manuf Res 12(1):83–98
Kellens K et al (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)-CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: methodology description. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(1):69–78
Kellens K et al (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: Case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(2):242–251
Drizo A, Pegna J (2006) Environmental impacts of rapid prototyping: an overview of research to date. Rapid Prototyping J 12(2):64–71
Gutowski TG et al (2009) Thermodynamic analysis of resources used in manufacturing processes. Environ Sci Technol 43(5):1584–1590
Gutowski T et al (2017) Note on the rate and energy efficiency limits for additive manufacturing. J Ind Ecol (Forthcoming)
Le Bourhis F et al (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):1927–1939
Mognol P, Lepicart D, Perry N (2006) Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyping J 12(1):26–34
Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS (2010) Rapid prototying: principles and applications, 3rd edn. World Scientific, River Edge
Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2010) Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):247–250
Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 1–3:323–331
Campbell RI, Martorelli M, Lee HS (2002) Surface roughness visualization for rapid prototyping models. Comput Aided Des 34(10):717–725
Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(6):585–594
Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P (2001) Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):385–388
Kantaros A, Karalekas D (2013) Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Mater Des 50(17):44–50
Boschetto A, Bottini L (2015) Roughness prediction in coupled operations of fused deposition modeling and barrel finishing. J Mater Process Technol 219:181–192
Luo Y et al (1999) Environmental performance analysis of solid freeform fabrication processes. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment
Allen S, Dutta D (1995) Determination and evaluation of support structures in layered manufacturing. J Des Manuf 34(62):49–52
Huang X, Ye C, Wu S (2009) Sloping wall structure support generation for fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11):1074–1081
Heide EK (2011) Method for generating and building support structures with deposition-based digital manufacturing systems. US Patent 20,110,178,621
Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM (2012) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254
Zhang X, Xia Y, Wang J (2015) Medial axis tree—an internal supporting structure for 3D printing. Comput Aided Geom Des 35:149–162
Boschetto A, Bottini L (2014) Surface characterization of fused deposition modeling. IGI Global, Hershey
Whitehouse DJ (2011) Handbook of surface and nanometrology. CRC Press, New York
Clemon L et al (2013) Precision and energy usage for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition IMECE, San Diego, California, USA
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505423), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2016QNA4002), Education Department of Zhejiang Province (No. N20150229), and Director Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control (Grant No. SKLoFP_ZR_1603). The author would like to thank former group members, Mr. Hong Zhang, Mr. Hao Chen, Ms. Fei Yan, Mr. Jingxiong Ye, for their experimental works, and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments in improving this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peng, T. (2019). Research Framework of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing: A Case of Fused Deposition Modeling. In: Gupta, K. (eds) Innovations in Manufacturing for Sustainability. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03276-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03276-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03275-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03276-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)