Skip to main content

Measuring Literacy, Attitudes, and Capacities to Solve Societal Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Teaching About Earth and the Environment for a Sustainable Future

Abstract

Effective assessments offer more than just a measurement of learning. When sequenced and aligned to evidence-based curriculum, assessments can facilitate learning and inform instruction. The Interdisciplinary Teaching about Earth for a Sustainable Future (InTeGrate) project viewed assessment as a core strategy of the curriculum being developed. InTeGrate used a community-based approach to assessment. An assessment team engaged with materials development teams to facilitate module and course assessment design, developed common instruments to assess student learning, analyzed student data from pilot tests to inform curriculum revisions, and used the findings to fine-tune assessment instruments and to shed light on opportunities for faculty development within the geoscience education community. The community approach ensured high-quality curricula and assessments and strategies to investigate learning at the module, course, and project level. Perhaps more importantly, the approach increased the capacity of the geoscience education community by harnessing the expertise from within the community to promote a culture of evaluative thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAAS (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • AAAS (2011) Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Geosciences Institute (2009) Status of the geocience workforce. https://www.americangeosciences.org/workforce/reports. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • Argyris C (1976) Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Adm Sci Q:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke LM (2012) Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 13(1):56–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix Mansilla V, Duraising ED (2007) Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: an empirically grounded framework proposed. J High Educ 78(2):215–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee R, McCrae B, Laurie R (2009) PISA 2006: an assessment of scientific literacy. J Res Sci Teach 46(8):865–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champagne AB, Kouba VL (2000) Writing to inquire: written products as performance measures. In: Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD (eds) Assessing science understanding: a human constructivist view. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 224–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger AE, Kastens KA, Turrin MK (2017) Sustainability, the Next Generation Science Standards, and the education of future teachers. J Geosci Educ 65(2):168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger AE, Bruckner MZ, Birnbaum SJ, Gilbert LA (this volume) Facilitating the development of effective interdisciplinary curricular materials. In: Gosselin DC, Egger AE, Taber JJ (eds) Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future, Association of Environmental Sciences and Studies (AESS) book series. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrman M (n.d.) Questionnaire to measure indicators for recruitment/retention in geoscience careers, developed to evaluate projects in NSF’s Opportunities for Enhancing Diversity in the Geosciences (OEDG) program. American Institutes for Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LA, Gross D, Kreutz K (2016) Systems thinking. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/teaching_materials/syst_thinking/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • Gilbert LA, Iverson ER, Kastens KA, Awad A, McCauley EQ, Caulkins JL, Steer DN, McConnell DA, Manduca CA (2017) Explicit focus on systems thinking in InTeGrate materials yields improved student performance. Paper presented at the GSA Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 22–25 October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin DC, Manduca CA, Bralower TJ, Egger AE (this volume) Preparing students to address societally relevant challenges in the geosciences: the InTeGrate approach. In: Gosselin DC, Egger AE, Taber JJ (eds) Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future, AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences series. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlton HR (2010) Geoscience major career choice: investigation of pathways that lead students to the geosciences. Paper presented at the 2010 GSA Annual Meeting, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • InTeGrate (2012a) InTeGrate assessment team 2012 meeting notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • InTeGrate (2012b) Your module/course development timeline. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/info_team_members/currdev/timeline.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2014) Using InTeGrate modules and courses. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/teaching_materials/using/index.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2018

  • InTeGrate (2015) Developing systems thinking webinar. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/workshops/webinars/2015_2016/systems.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2017a) Classroom data collection and grading tools. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/data_tools.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2017b) Implementation programs. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/programs/implementation/index.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018a) Assessment and project evaluation. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/assessment.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018b) Essay assessments: interdisciplinary and systems thinking. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/essays.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018c) Faculty surveys. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/faculty_surveys.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018d) Geoscience literacy exam (GLE). https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/gle.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018e) HBCU Working Group. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/hbcu_working_group.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018f) The InTeGrate attitudinal instrument (IAI). https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/about/iai.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • InTeGrate (2018g) Teach systems thinking. https://serc.carleton.edu/integrate/teaching_materials/themes/expert_thinking/systems.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • Janzen R, Ochocka J, Turner L, Cook T, Franklin M, Deichert D (2017) Building a community-based culture of evaluation. Eval Program Plann 65:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R, Snow J, Abshire W, Buhr S, Cullen H, Denning S, Holland M, Manduca C, Pennington P, Schoedinger S, Schultz P, Shepherd JP (2009) Essential principles and fundamental concepts for atmospheric science literacy. NSF: Geoscience Education Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastens KA, Manduca CA (2017) Using systems thinking in the design, implementation, and evaluation of complex educational innovations, with examples from the InTeGrate project. J Geosci Educ 65(3):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastens KA, Manduca CA (2018) Leveraging the power of community of practice to improve teaching and learning about the Earth. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastens KA, Mara V (2016) InTeGrate evaluation report: underrepresented minorities

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastens KA, Mara V (2017) InTeGrate evaluation report: IAI responses of InTeGrate versus non-InTeGrate students

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastens KA, Mara V (2018) Where is InTeGrate having its impact on Earth and environmental motivation and action? An analysis of IAI data with respect to student’s reason for taking the course

    Google Scholar 

  • Labin SN, Duffy JL, Meyers DC, Wandersman A, Lesesne CA (2012) A research synthesis of the evaluation capacity building literature. Am J Eval 33(3):307–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaDue ND, Clark SK (2012) Educator perspectives on Earth system science literacy: challenges and priorities. J Geosci Educ 60(4):372–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libarkin JC, Anderson SW (2005) Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory. J Geosci Educ 53(4):394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manduca CA, Iverson ER, Luxenberg M, Macdonald RH, McConnell DA, Mogk DW, Tewksbury BJ (2017) Improving undergraduate STEM education: the efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Sci Adv 3(2):e1600193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016) Science literacy: concepts, contexts, and consequences. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA, National Geographic Society, COSEE, National Marine Educators Association (2005) Ocean literacy: the essential principals of ocean sciences K-12. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/literacy.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2018

  • Novak JD, Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH (2000) Learning, teaching, and assessment: a human constructivist perspective. In: Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD (eds) Assessing science understanding: a human constructivist view. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • On the Cutting Edge (2016) About the Cutting Edge embedded assessment project. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/embedded_assessment/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • Orr CH, McDaris JR (this volume) Supporting implementation of program-level changes to increase learning about Earth. In: Gosselin DC, Egger AE, Taber JJ (eds) Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future, Association of Environmental Sciences and Studies (AESS) book series. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2010) Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • PISA (2015) Program for international student assessment, oecd.org

  • Preskill H, Boyle S (2008) A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. Am J Eval 29(4):443–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockman (2013) On the Cutting Edge project: year 3 independent evaluation report. http://serc.carleton.edu/files/NAGTWorkshops/about/2013_external_evaluation_repor.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • SERC (2017) Serkit. https://serc.carleton.edu/serc/about/serckit.html. Accessed Dec 2017

  • Steer D, Iverson ER, Manduca CA (2013) Piloting a geoscience literacy exam for assessing students’ understanding of Earth, climate, atmospheric and ocean science concepts. Paper presented at the AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, CA, 9–13 December 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Steer D, Iverson ER, Egger AE, Kastens KA, Manduca CA, McConnell D (this volume) The InTeGrate materials development rubric: a framework and process for developing curricular materials that meet ambitions goals. In: Gosselin DC, Egger AE, Taber JJ (eds) Interdisciplinary teaching about Earth and the environment for a sustainable future, Association of Environmental Sciences and Studies (AESS) book series. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009) Climate literacy: essential principles and fundamental concepts. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the American Association for the Advancement of Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Viskupic K, Steer D, Kortz KM, Perkins D, Wirth K, Herbert B, Singer J, Manduca CA (2014) Monitoring undergraduate growth through the major using embedded assessment questions, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vancouver, BC 46(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins G, McTighe J (1998) Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysession ME (2012) Implications for earth and space in new K–12 science standards. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 93(46):465–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysession M, Taber J, Budd DA, Campbell K, Conklin M, LaDue N, Lewis G, Raynolds R, Ridky R, Ross R, Tewksbury B, Tuddenham P (2009) Earth science literacy: the big ideas and supporting concepts of Earth science. NSF: The Earth Science Literacy Initiative

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysession ME, LaDue N, Budd DA, Campbell K, Conklin M, Kappel E, Lewis G, Raynolds R, Ridky RW, Ross RM (2012) Developing and applying a set of earth science literacy principles. J Geosci Educ 60(2):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Leads

David Steer, University of Akron Main Campus (2011–2017)

Ellen Iverson, Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College (2011–2017)

Stuart Birnbaum, University of Texas at San Antonio (2012–2017)

Team Members

Leilani Arthurs, University of Nebraska at Lincoln (2013–2017)

Aida Awad, Broward Community College (2012–2017)

Barbara Bekken, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2013–2017)

Joshua Caulkins, University of Rhode Island (2012–2017)

Wendy J. Harrison, Colorado School of Mines (2012)

Megan Plenge, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2014–2017)

Sian Proctor, Maricopa County Community College (2012)

Mary Savina, Carleton College (2012–2017)

Susan Sullivan, University of Colorado at Boulder (2012–2017)

Emily Geraghty Ward, Rocky Mountain College (2012–2014)

Karen Viskupic, Boise State University (2012–2017)

Project Liaison

Kristin O’Connell, Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen R. Iverson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Geoscience Literacy Exam: 8 Question Instrument (GLE Common-8)

Appendix: The Geoscience Literacy Exam: 8 Question Instrument (GLE Common-8)

Literacy addressed

Question

Earth science literacy

Natural hazards pose risks to humans

1. Natural hazards can be put into two major categories. Some natural hazards can be made worse by humans; others are largely independent of human activities. Select the natural hazard least likely to be affected by human activity

 (a) Forest fires

 (b) Tsunami

 (c) Landslides

 (d) Coastal erosion

Earth science literacy

Earth is continuously changing

2. Which of the following geologic processes are most likely caused by the interactions between the tectonic plates at their boundaries? Select all that apply

 (a) Earthquakes

 (b) Continental glaciation

 (c) Floods

 (d) Volcanic eruptions

 (e) Mountains

Ocean literacy

The ocean supports a great diversity of life and ecosystems

3. Which of the following statements about the distribution of life in the oceans is most correct?

 (a) Life is more abundant and diverse in some parts of the ocean than in others

 (b) Life is abundant and diverse throughout the ocean

 (c) Life is less abundant and diverse in the oceans than it is on land

Ocean literacy

The ocean and humans are inextricably interconnected

4. Which of the following ways do humans affect oceans? Select all that apply

 (a) Humans alter ocean ecosystems through fishing

 (b) Humans alter shorelines through development

 (c) Humans mine mid-ocean ridges

 (d) Humans change overall ocean composition by desalination

 (e) Humans alter tidal cycles

Atmospheric literacy

Earth’s atmosphere continuously interacts with other components of the Earth System

5. Which of the following processes primarily involves the atmosphere and the biosphere?

 (a) The formation of limestone

 (b) The photosynthetic cycle

 (c) The hydrological cycle

6. Which of the following processes are sources of carbon to the atmosphere? Select all that apply

 (a) Plant decay

 (b) Limestone formation

 (c) Cattle ranching

 (d) Fossil fuel use

Climate literacy

Our understanding of the climate system is improved through observations, theoretical studies, and modeling

7. There are several climate models used to research future change. Which climate modeling statement about twenty-first-century temperature change projections is most accurate?

 (a) Climate model projections do not agree on future likely outcomes

 (b) Climate model projections show similar trends for future outcomes

 (c) Climate model projections show the same results for future outcomes

8. The first reasonably accurate mercury thermometers were invented in 1724, almost 300 years ago. What kinds of processes and/or data are used by scientists to determine temperatures more than 10,000 years in the past? Select all that apply

 (a) Written records

 (b) Ice cores

 (c) Tree rings

 (d) Sedimentary layers

 (e) Oxygen isotopes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iverson, E.R., Steer, D., Gilbert, L.A., Kastens, K.A., O’Connell, K., Manduca, C.A. (2019). Measuring Literacy, Attitudes, and Capacities to Solve Societal Problems. In: Gosselin, D., Egger, A., Taber, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Teaching About Earth and the Environment for a Sustainable Future. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03273-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics