Skip to main content

Toleration and Justice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

In this entry, the relation between toleration and justice is analyzed starting by discussing the liberal perspective, and taking into consideration both its historical roots and its more recent developments. Within this approach, toleration provided a viable strategy for the coexistence of the beliefs, values, and ways of life of all citizens, by dividing the political sphere from the private realm, and neutralizing both these areas. The entry also analyzes the criticisms that have been addressed to the liberal account of toleration, like the fact that the neutrality principle reflects the values and the conception of the dominant majority, in so neglecting power imbalances, and does not consider social advantages and disadvantages related to the public/private distinction. In the second part, the entry discusses two perspectives on the relation between toleration and justice, those of John Rawls and Rainer Forst, which are considered as partially answering these criticisms. While Rawls’ theory does not precisely define the relation between toleration and justice, and it has been considered as excessively linked to an ideal and initial situation, the theory of Rainer Forst takes power relations explicitly into account, by distinguishing different conceptions of toleration. The analysis of both the theories highlights that the role played by reason in questions concerning toleration may overshadow the fact that reason and reasonableness are always exercised within specific power relations. Therefore, in the final part of the entry, accounts of toleration that start from the recognition of specific intergroup relations, and that are aimed at counterbalancing them as a political objective, are discussed. In these accounts, toleration is understood as delivering justice through social and political inclusion, and as counterbalancing political asymmetries, being given in cases that are beyond the range of what we can recognize and accommodate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bader V (1997) The cultural conditions of transnational citizenship: on the interpenetration of political and ethnic cultures. Political Theory 25(6):771–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackhall LJ, Murphy S, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S (1995) Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. J Am Med Assoc 274(10):820–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman J (2003) Reflexive toleration in a deliberative democracy. In: McKinnon C, Castiglione D (eds) The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (2006) Regulating aversion: tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun C (2002) Imagining solidarity: cosmopolitanism, constitutional patriotism, and the public sphere. Publ Cult 14(1):147–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill RP (1997) On the difference between moral and non-moral conceptions of toleration: the case for toleration as an individual virtue. In: Razavi MA, Ambuel D (eds) Philosophy, religion, and the question of intolerance. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg A, Spinner-Halev J (eds) (2005) Minorities within minorities: equality, rights and diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice D (1993) Autonomy as a good: liberalism, autonomy and toleration. J Polit Philos 1(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2015) Toleration and the design of norms. Sci Eng Ethics 21(5):1095–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst R (2003) Toleration, justice and reason. In: McKinnon C, Castiglione D (eds) The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst R (2004) The limits of toleration. Constellations 11(3):314–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst R (2012) Toleration. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2012 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/toleration/

  • Galeotti AE (1993) Citizenship and equality: the place for toleration. Political Theory 21(4):585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti AE (2002) Toleration as recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2006) Religion in the public sphere. Eur J Philos 14(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyd D (ed) (1996) Toleration: an elusive virtue. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd D (2008) Is toleration a political virtue? In: Williams MS, Waldron J (eds) Toleration and its limits. New York University Press, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P (2006) Toleration, recognition and identity. J Polit Philos 14(2):123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost JT (2017) Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Polit Psychol 38(2):167–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1929) Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Mohr, TĂĽbingen

    Google Scholar 

  • King P (1976) Toleration. St Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas C (1997) Cultural toleration. Nomos 39:69–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka W (1989) Liberal individualism and Liberal neutrality. Ethics 99(4):883–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laegaard S (2013) Toleration out of respect? Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 16(4):520–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (2016) Second treatise of government and a letter concerning toleration. Goldie M (ed) Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes S (1997) Toleration as recognition. Ratio Juris 10(2):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macioce F (2014) Freedom of treatment. In: Encyclopedia of global bioethics

    Google Scholar 

  • Macioce F (2017) Toleration as asymmetric recognition. Persona y Derecho 77:227–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean A (2009) Autonomy, informed consent and medical law: a relational challenge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit A (1998) The decent society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon C (2006) Toleration. A critical introduction. Routledge, Oxon/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood T (2007) Multiculturalism. A Civic idea. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C (2000) Politics and passions. Ethical Perspect 7(2):146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy M (2012) Multiculturalism: a critical introduction. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum MC (2006) Radical evil in the Lockean state: the neglect of the political emotions. J Moral Philos 3(2):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panikkar R (1979) The myth of pluralism: the tower of babel. A meditation on non-violence. CrossCurrents 29(2):197–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Peroni L, Timmer A (2013) Vulnerable groups: the promise of an emerging concept in European human rights convention law. Int J Constit Law 11(4):1056–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999a) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999b) The idea of public reason revisited. In: Rawls J (ed) Collected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadan E (2004) Empowerment and community planning: theory and practice of people-focused social solutions. Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishers, Tel Aviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon TM (1996) The difficulty of tolerance. In: Heyd D (ed) Toleration: an elusive virtue. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (1994) The appeal of political liberalism. Ethics 105(1):4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutman A (ed) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veer P (2006) Pim Fortuyn, Theo van Gogh, and the politics of tolerance in the Netherlands. Publ Cult 18:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten M (2019) Intergroup toleration and its implications for culturally diverse societies. Soc Issues Policy Rev 13(1):5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2003) Toleration and reasonableness. In: McKinnon C, Castiglione D (eds) The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff J (2003) Social ethos and the dynamics of toleration. In: McKinnon C, Castiglione D (eds) The culture of toleration in diverse societies: reasonable tolerance. Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (1997) Asymmetrical reciprocity: on moral respect, wonder, and enlarged thought. Constellations 3(3):340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (1999) Ruling norms and the politics of difference: a comment on Seyla Benhabib. Yale J Criticism 12(2):415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Macioce, F. (2021). Toleration and Justice. In: SardoÄŤ, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03227-2_36-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03227-2_36-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03227-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03227-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics