Skip to main content

Toxic Masculinity: Militarism, Deal-Making and the Performance of Brexit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

Abstract

This chapter argues that the campaign for Britain to leave the European Union (EU) and the subsequent Brexit process have been dominated by discourses of toxic masculinity, manifesting in two distinct ways: first through the deployment of language that was associated with deal-making and, second through the deployment of language associated with militarism. Drawing on a combination of critical feminist theory, documentary analysis and elite, semi-structured interviews with individuals close to the process, this chapter demonstrates the extent to which Brexit has been dominated by discourses of militarism, which highlighted Britain’s assumed global role in the world emphasising strength, security and global power, and deal-making discourses which have equated the negotiations to a business transaction, positioning Anglo-European negotiations in conflictual terms. We conclude with four potential (gendered) consequences of this discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interview conducted by Benjamin Martill and Anton Gromoczki, House of Lords, 20 July 2017.

  2. 2.

    Interview conducted by Oliver Patel and Jose Feio, Brussels, 25 July 2017.

  3. 3.

    Interview conducted by Benjamin Martill, Brussels, 19 July 2017.

  4. 4.

    Interview conducted by Benjamin Martill and Anton Gromoczki, House of Lords, 20 July 2017.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted, perhaps unsurprisingly, that support for the free-market did not feature in the campaigns. From the Labour (‘Labour Leave’) and Green (‘Green Leave’) campaigns, which focused instead upon the EU’s treatment of Greece, its support for ‘tax-dodging multinationals’, and its contribution to insecurity in the East (e.g. Labour Leave 2016; Green Leaves 2016).

Bibliography

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Moira Dustin for detailed comments on the manuscript and Daniel Payne at the LSE Archives for his assistance in tracking down material from the referendum campaign(s). We would also like to thank participants of the Feminist and Queer Perspectives on Brexit Workshop at Sussex University for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Martill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Achilleos-Sarll, C., Martill, B. (2019). Toxic Masculinity: Militarism, Deal-Making and the Performance of Brexit. In: Dustin, M., Ferreira, N., Millns, S. (eds) Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03122-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics