Skip to main content

Accountability and Responsibility in Agent Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2018)

Abstract

We discuss the limits of current agent organizations, and the benefits of introducing an explicit account of responsibility and accountability. We, then, illustrate how through such notions it is possible to design both organization specifications and organization entities, that are guaranteed to properly distribute responsibilities, that is, not only to own but also to connect the needed, distributed control over the goal so as to enable its achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aldewereld, H., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Noriega, P., Padget, J. (eds.): Social Coordination Frameworks for Social Technical Systems. LGTS, vol. 30. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33570-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldewereld, H., Dignum, V., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Agreeing on role adoption in open organisations. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz 26(1), 37–45 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Capuzzimati, F., Micalizio, R.: Type checking for protocol role enactments via commitments. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 32(3), 349–386 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., May, K.M., Micalizio, R., Tedeschi, S.: Computational accountability in MAS organizations with ADOPT. J. Appl. Sci. 8(4), 489 (2018). Special issue “Multi-Agent Systems”

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., May, K.M., Micalizio, R., Tedeschi, S.: ADOPT JaCaMo: accountability-driven organization programming technique for JaCaMo. In: An, B., Bazzan, A., Leite, J., Villata, S., van der Torre, L. (eds.) PRIMA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10621, pp. 295–312. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69131-2_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., May, K.M., Micalizio, R., Tedeschi, S.: An information model for computing accountabilities. In: Ghedini, C., Magnini, B., Passerini, A., Traverso, P. (eds.) Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, AI*IA 2018. LNAI, Trento, Italy. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to the special issue on normative multiagent systems. J. AAMAS 17(1), 1–10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boissier, O., Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Ricci, A., Santi, A.: Multi-agent oriented programming with JaCaMo. Sci. Comput. Program. 78(6), 747–761 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castelfranchi, C.: Principles of individual social action. In: Contemporary Action Theory: Social Action, vol. 2, pp. 163–192. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chopra, A.K., Dalpiaz, F., Aydemir, F.B., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Singh, M.P.: Protos: foundations for engineering innovative sociotechnical systems. In: IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 53–62 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: From social machines to social protocols: software engineering foundations for sociotechnical systems. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on WWW (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colman, A., Han, J.: Operational management contracts for adaptive software organisation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 170–179. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Corkill, D.D., Lesser, V.R.: The use of meta-level control for coordination in distributed problem solving network. In: Bundy, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1983, pp. 748–756. William Kaufmann, Los Altos (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coutinho, L.R., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Modelling dimensions for agent organizations. In: Handbook of Research on Multi-Agent Systems: Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models, pp. 18–50. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. da Rocha Costa, A.C.: Proposal for a notion of modularity in multiagent systems. In: Dalpiaz, F., Dix, J., van Riemsdijk, M.B. (eds.) Pre-proceedings of Engineering Multi-Agent Systems Workshop at AAMAS, Paris, pp. 21–40 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dastani, M., Tinnemeier, N.A.M., Meyer, J.-J.C.: A programming language for normative multi-agent systems. In: Handbook of Research on Multi-Agent Systems: Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models, pp. 397–417. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht University (2004). Published by SIKS

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dignum, V.: Handbook of Research on Multi-Agent Systems: Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Dignum, V., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.: OMNI: introducing social structure, norms and ontologies into agent organizations. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) ProMAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3346, pp. 181–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32260-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Durkheim, E.: De la division du travail social. PUF, Paris (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Esteva, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In: Dignum, F., Sierra, C. (eds.) Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce. LNCS, vol. 1991, pp. 126–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44682-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: Artificial institutions: a model of institutional reality for open multiagent systems. Artif. Intell. Law 16(1), 89–105 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 20(3), 369–400 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Teussop, R.K.: Gestion de louverture au sein dorganisations multi-agents: une approche basée sur des artefacts organisationnels. Ph.D. thesis. EMSE, Saint-Etienne (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marengo, E., Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Chopra, A.K., Patti, V., Singh, M.P.: Commitments with regulations: reasoning about safety and control in REGULA. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, vol. 2, pp. 467–474 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Romzek, B.S., Dubnick, M.J.: Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Adm. Rev. 47(3), 227–238 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlenker, B.R., Britt, T.W., Pennington, J., Rodolfo, M., Doherty, K.: The triangle model of responsibility. Psychol. Rev. 101(4), 632–652 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, M.P.: An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems. Artif. Intell. Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh, M.P.,: Distributed enactment of multiagent workflows: temporal logic for web service composition. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 14–18 July 2003, pp. 907–914. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Baldoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Boissier, O., May, K.M., Micalizio, R., Tedeschi, S. (2018). Accountability and Responsibility in Agent Organizations. In: Miller, T., Oren, N., Sakurai, Y., Noda, I., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cao Son, T. (eds) PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03097-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03098-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics