Skip to main content

Influence of Animal Handling and Housing on Multimodality Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Image Fusion in Preclinical Applications
  • 450 Accesses

Abstract

Development of small-animal imaging systems for functional and anatomical measurements resulted in a fundamental shift toward smaller animals being used for medical research. Rodents, in particular rats and mice, have become the most commonly used species due in part to their low cost, ability to image large numbers quickly, and ease of handling. This had led to the development of support devices such as imaging chambers and specialized anesthesia systems. These imaging chambers provide physiological and physical support for imaging animals, which in turn facilitates imaging animals multiple times and in multiple imaging systems. The ability to reproducibly position animals greatly aids in image analysis, making it easier to co-register and fuse images, draw and reuse regions of interest across studies, and create uniformly positioned images for presentation.

The focus of this chapter is on imaging chambers and the physiological variations that can occur due to variations in handling and housing conditions and how these factors impact image fusion and analysis. The ideal conditions are dependent on the experimental design requirements for each particular research investigation; thus it is essential to have a range of conditions suitable for imaging research. Well-defined and followed protocols are important for any scientific research project; however the appropriate animal model, housing, and handling conditions vary, and no one set of conditions can be applied to all animal research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glasser O. Wilhelm Röntgen and the early history of the Roentgen rays. San Francisco, CA: Norman Publishing; 1993. p. 25, ISBN: 0930405226.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jaszczak RJ. The early years of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT): an anthology of selected reminiscences. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:R99–115. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R07.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Portnow LH, Vaillancourt DE, Okun MS. The history of cerebral PET scanning. Neurology. 2013;80:952. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318285c135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherry SR, Gambhir SS. Use of positron emission tomography in animal research. ILAR J. 2001;42(3):219–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.42.3.219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zinn KR, Chaudhuri TR, Szafran AA, O’Quinn D, Weaver C, Dugger K, Lamar D, Kesterson RA, Wang X, Frank SJ. Noninvasive bioluminescence imaging in small animals. ILAR J. 2008;49(1):103–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.49.1.103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne DR, Kuntner C, Berr S, Stout DB. Guidance of efficient small animal imaging quality control. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:485–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-1012-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Magota K, Kudo N, Kuge Y, Nishijima K, Zhao S, Tamaki N. Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:742–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1683-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chehade M, Srivastava AK, Bulte JWM. Co-registration of bioluminescence tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for multimodal in vivo stem cell tracking. Tomography. 2016;2:158–65. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00160.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Torigian DA, Zaidi H, Kwee TC, Saboury B, Udupa JK, Cho ZHC, Alavi A. PET/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. Radiology. 2013;267:26–44. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF, Newport DF, et al. Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging. Nat Med. 2008;14:459–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sasser TA, Chapman SE, Sanders I, Liepert L, Leevy WM. Cross-platform MRI/PET or MRI/SPECT imaging, and co-registration. 2016. Available at: https://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upload/8-PDF-Docs/PreclinicalImaging/Brochures/T156737_App_Note_Cross-Platform_edit_bur.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.

  12. Suckow CE, Kuntner C, Chow PL, Silverman RW, Chatziioannou AF, Stout DB. Multimodality rodent imaging chambers for use under barrier conditions with gas anesthesia. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:100–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-008-0165-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira FP, Tavares JM. Medical image registration: a review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17:73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.670855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Stout D, Chatziioannou A. A deformable atlas of the laboratory mouse. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-014-0767-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Segars WP, Tsui BMW, Frey EC, Johnson GA, Berr SS. Development of a 4D digital mouse phantom for molecular imaging research. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:149–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mibio.2004.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I, Tran C, Halpern BS, Stout DB, Phelps ME, Weber WA. Impact of animal handling on the results of FDG-PET studies in mice. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(6):999–1006.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. David J, Knowles S, Lamkin D, Stout D. Individually ventilated cages impose cold stress on laboratory mice: a source of systemic experimental variability. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2013;52:738–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. David J, Chatziioannou A, Taschereau R, Wang H, Stout D. The hidden cost of housing practices: quantifying the metabolic demands of chronic cold-stress of laboratory mice with non-invasive imaging. Comp Med. 2013;63(5):386–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jilge B, Kunz E. The laboratory mouse, Chapter 20. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012336425-8/50073-X.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Stout D, Berr S, LeBlanc A, Kalen J, Osborne D, Price J, Schiffer W, Kuntner C, Wall J. Guidance for methods descriptions used in preclinical imaging papers. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;12:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NEMA DICOM WG30 Supplemental 187. https://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup187_ft_preclinicalanimalacquistitioncontext.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stout, D. (2019). Influence of Animal Handling and Housing on Multimodality Imaging. In: Kuntner-Hannes, C., Haemisch, Y. (eds) Image Fusion in Preclinical Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02973-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02973-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02972-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02973-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics