Skip to main content

Art Critics and Art Producers: Interaction Through the Text

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2018)

Abstract

As well as the most areas of social life, the field of art is now extended to the cyberspace. In this study, we analyze online reviews of Russian art critics with two objectives. On the one hand, we investigate the patterns of the interactions between critics and artists (both contemporary and recognized ones) in the Russian Art. Since the Russian school of art critique is still in the process of formation, an analysis of web data we offer a significant contribution to the scope of Russian Art studies. On the other hand, we use social network analysis and text mining tools in order to gain more insights from the data and affirm the applicability of the modern tools to the classic research tasks. In this study we analyze data from the 5 Russian art magazines, in particular articles, authors and named entities from this texts. As a result, we explored different patterns of the critics production that could divide this area of web interaction both by geographical and textual characteristics of agents and articles.

A. Alekseev—List of authors is in reverse alphabetical order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bourdieu, P.: Theory of Symbolic Power. Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, vol. 155 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdieu, P.: Outline of a sociological theory of art perception. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 20(4), 589–612 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Allison, P.D.: Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: a core-periphery perspective. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79(2), 258–281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414520960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chetviorkin, I., Loukachevitch, N.: Extraction of Russian sentiment lexicon for product meta-domain. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012, pp. 593–610 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eliashberg, J., Shugan, S.M.: Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors? J. Mark. 61(2), 68–78 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koltsova O., Alexeeva S., Kolcov S.: An opinion word lexicon and a training dataset for Russian sentiment analysis of social media. In: International Conference Dialogue 2016. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, pp. 277–287 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Korobov, M.: Morphological analyzer and generator for Russian and Ukrainian languages. In: Khachay, M.Y., Konstantinova, N., Panchenko, A., Ignatov, D.I., Labunets, V.G. (eds.) AIST 2015. CCIS, vol. 542, pp. 320–332. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26123-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kukushkin, A.: Natasha/named entity recognition library. GitHub. https://github.com/natasha/natasha. Accessed 7 Mar 2018

  9. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Doklady 10(8), 707–710 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. de Nooy, W.: Social networks and classification in literature. Poetics 20(5), 507–537 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90023-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Nooy, W.: A literary playground: literary criticism and balance theory. Poetics 26(5–6), 385–404 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson, R.: The Production of Culture A Prolegomenon. Am. Behav. Sci. 19(6), 669–684 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427601900601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shrum, W.: Fringe and Fortune: The Role of Critics in High and Popular Art. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swanwick, K.: Musical criticism and musical development. Br. J. Music Educ. 8(2), 139–148 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505170000824X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uzzi, B., Spiro, J.: Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 447–504 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/432782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White, H.C., White, C.A.: Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Kuleva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Menshikova, A., Maglevanaya, D., Kuleva, M., Bogdanova, S., Alekseev, A. (2018). Art Critics and Art Producers: Interaction Through the Text. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 859. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02846-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02846-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02846-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics