Skip to main content

Social Efficiency of E-participation Portals in Russia: Assessment Methodology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2018)

Abstract

The paper presents a methodology for e-participation portals social efficiency assessment based on the United Nations (UN) approach. The system of indicators frames a political decision-making cycle and covers 3 dimensions of social efficiency such as political, technological and socio-economic. The methodology developed involves factors that are available from open sources. The authors present results of the methodology approbation on 5 e-participation portals in Russia. The findings have revealed the portals studied show the least progress in socio-economic dimension of social efficiency compared to political and technological ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chugunov, A., Filatova, O., Misnikov, Y.: Online discourse as a microdemocracy tool: towards new discursive epistemics for policy deliberation. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01–03 March 2016, pp. 40–49. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Misnikov, Y.: Citizens versus the government or citizens with the government: a tale of two e-participation portals in one city - a case study of St. Petersburg, Russia. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F128003, pp. 70–77. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Civil Participation in Decision-Making Processes: An overview of standards and practices in Council of European Member States. European Center for Not-for-profit Law. European Center for Not-for-profit Law (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Criado, J.I., Rojas-Martín, F., Gil-Garcia, J.R.: Enacting social media success in local public administrations: an empirical analysis of organizational, institutional, and contextual factors. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 30(1), 31–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2016-0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawes, S.S., Gharawi, M.A., Burke, G.B.: Transnational public sector knowledge networks: knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(Suppl. 1), S112–S120 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 15–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Sutherland, M.K.: Information sharing in the regulatory context: revisiting the concepts of cross-boundary information sharing. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 01–03 March 2016, pp. 346–349. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hagen, L., Harrison, T.M., Uzuner, Ö., May, W., Fake, T., Katragadda, S.: E-petition popularity: do linguistic and semantic factors matter? Gov. Inf. Q. 33(4), 783–795 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison, T.M., et al.: E-petitioning and online media: the case of #bringbackourgirls. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F128275, pp. 11–20. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jho, W., Song, K.: Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 488–495 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen, T., Bozeman, B.: Public values an inventory. Adm. Soc. 39, 354–381 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawaljeet, K.K., Amizan, O., Utyasankar, S.: Enabling multichannel participation through ICT adaptation. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 13, 66–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2017040104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kipenis, L., Askounis, D.: Assessing e-Participation via user’s satisfaction measurement: the case of OurSpace platform. Ann. Oper. Res. 247(2), 599–615 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1911-8

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Luna-Reyes, L.F., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Puron-Cid, G., Picazo-Vela, S., Luna, Dolores E., G-G., J.R.: Understanding public value creation in the delivery of electronic services. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 378–385. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for e-Participation. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 2(1), 16–30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810862928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level. UNDESA Working Paper (2013). http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/METEP%20framework_18%20Jul_MOST%20LATEST%20Version.pdf

  17. Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 346–360 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, M.H.: Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Picazo-Vela, S., et al.: The role of social media sites on social movements against policy changes. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F128275, pp. 588–589. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Radu, R.: E-participation and deliberation in the European Union: the case of debate Europe. Int. J. E-Polit. 5(2), 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014040101

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Reggi, L., Dawes, S.: Open government data ecosystems: linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability. In: Scholl, H.J., et al. (eds.) EGOVIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9820, pp. 74–86. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-Garcia, J.R.: Cyberactivism through social media: Twitter, YouTube, and the Mexican political movement “I’m Number 132”. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, № 6480047, pp. 1704–1713 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scherer, S., Wimmer, M.: Trust in E-participation: literature review and emerging research needs. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 61–70, 27–30 October 2014, Guimaraes (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schroeter, R., Scheel, O., Renn, O., Schweizer, P.: Testing the value of public participation in Germany: theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 116–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ter’an, L., Drobnjak, A.: An evaluation framework for eParticipation: the VAAs case study. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 7(1), 77–85 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. UN E-government Survey (2016). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2016

  27. Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Participation in policy making. Study of Social Impact of ICT (CPP № 55 A - SMART №2007/0068). Topic Report, pp. 32–72 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vidiasova, L., Dawes, S.S.: The influence of institutional factors on E-governance development and performance: an exploration in the Russian Federation. Inf. Polity 22(4), 267–289 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vidiasova, L.: The applicability of international techniques for E-participation assessment in the Russian context. In: Chugunov, A.V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.) DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674, pp. 145–154. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng, Y.: The impact of E-participation on corruption: a cross-country analysis. Int. Rev. Public Adm. 21(2), 91–103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2016.1186457

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted with the support of RFBR grant No. 16-36-60035, “The research of social efficiency of e-participation portals in Russia”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyudmila Vidiasova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vidiasova, L., Tensina, I., Bershadskaya, E. (2018). Social Efficiency of E-participation Portals in Russia: Assessment Methodology. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02842-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02843-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics