Skip to main content

A Review of Distributed Ledger Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences (OTM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11230))

Abstract

Recently the race toward trusted distributed systems has attracted a huge interest, mostly due to the advances in crypto-currencies platforms such as Bitcoin. Currently, different Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs) are competing to demonstrate their capabilities and show how they can overcome the limitations faced by others. The common denominator among all distributed ledger technologies is their reliance on a distributed, decentralized peer-to-peer network and a set of modular mechanisms such as cryptographic hashes and consensuses mechanisms. However, their implementations vary substantially in terms of the used data structure, fault tolerance and consensus approaches. This divergence affects the nature of each instance of the DLT in terms of cost, security, latency and performance. In this paper, we present a snapshot of four existing implementations of DLTs. The particularities of each technology and an initial comparison between them is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hashgraph is new competitor for blockchain. https://bit.ly/2LAMNdN. Accessed 19 July 2018

  2. Ali, M.S., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F.: IoT data privacy via blockchains and IPFS. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Internet of Things, p. 14. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antonopoulos, A.M.: Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baird, L.: The swirlds hashgraph consensus algorithm: fair, fast, byzantine fault tolerance. Swirlds, Inc., Technical report SWIRLDS-TR-2016 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchmann, J., Dahmen, E., Ereth, S., Hülsing, A., Rückert, M.: On the security of the Winternitz one-time signature scheme. In: Nitaj, A., Pointcheval, D. (eds.) AFRICACRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6737, pp. 363–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21969-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cachin, C.: Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. El Ioini, N., Pahl, C.: Trustworthy orchestration of container based edge computing using permissioned blockchain. In: International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, T., Westbrook, R.: SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plann. 30(1), 46–52 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, I.C., Liao, T.C.: A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges. IJ Netw. Secur. 19(5), 653–659 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pahl, C., El Ioini, N., Helmer, S.: A decision framework for blockchain platforms for IoT and edge computing. In: International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pahl, C., El Ioini, N., Helmer, S., Lee, B.: An architecture pattern for trusted orchestration in IoT edge clouds. In: 2018 Third International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC), pp. 63–70. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Popov, S.: Iota: The tangle. https://iota.org/IOTA_Whitepaper.pdf (2016). Accessed 19 July 2018

  13. Walport, M.: Distributed ledger technology: beyond blockchain. UK Government Office for Science (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, X., et al.: A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA), pp. 243–252. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Wang, H.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Work Pap.-2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil El Ioini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

El Ioini, N., Pahl, C. (2018). A Review of Distributed Ledger Technologies. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Proper, H., Ardagna, C., Roman, D., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences. OTM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11230. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02670-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02671-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics