Abstract
With the rise of data-centric process management paradigms, small and interdependent processes, such as artifacts or object lifecycles, form a business process by interacting with each other. To arrive at a meaningful overall business process, these process interactions must be coordinated. One challenge is the proper consideration of one-to-many and many-to-many relations between interacting processes. Other challenges arise from the flexible, concurrent execution of the processes. Relational process structures and semantic relationships have been proposed for tackling these individual challenges. This paper introduces coordination processes, which bring together both relational process structures and semantic relationships, leveraging their features to enable proper coordination support for interdependent, concurrently running processes. Coordination processes contribute an abstracted and concise model for coordinating the highly complex interactions of interrelated processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A selection has been approved for publication, available at https://bit.ly/2yo6GTe.
- 2.
For more details on the prototype visit https://bit.ly/2KYvyT9.
- 3.
A selection has been approved for publication, available at https://bit.ly/2yo6GTe.
References
Belardinelli, F., Lomuscio, A., Patrizi, F.: Verification of GSM-based artifact-centric systems through finite abstraction. In: Liu, C., Ludwig, H., Toumani, F., Yu, Q. (eds.) ICSOC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7636, pp. 17–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34321-6_2
Damaggio, E., Hull, R., VaculÃn, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)
Decker, G., Weske, M.: Interaction-centric modeling of process choreographies. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 292–312 (2011)
Deutsch, A., Li, Y., Vianu, V.: Verification of hierarchical artifact systems. ArXiv e-prints (2016)
Eid-Sabbagh, R.-H., Dijkman, R., Weske, M.: Business process architecture: use and correctness. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 65–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_5
Fahland, D., de Leoni, M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Many-to-many: some observations on interactions in artifact choreographies. In: 3rd Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition (ZEUS), 2011. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 705, pp. 9–15. CEUR-WS.org (2011)
Hull, R., et al.: business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: 5th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-based System (DEBS) 2011, pp. 51–62. ACM (2011)
Hull, R., et al.: Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M., Bultan, T. (eds.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19589-1_1
Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: towards a framework for object-aware process management. J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res. Pract. 23(4), 205–244 (2011)
Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_10
Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: A new paradigm for the enactment and dynamic adaptation of data-driven process structures. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_4
Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 428–445 (2003)
Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011)
Steinau, S., Andrews, K., Reichert, M.: The relational process structure. In: Krogstie, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) CAiSE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10816, pp. 53–67. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91563-0_4
Steinau, S., Künzle, V., Andrews, K., Reichert, M.: Coordinating business processes using semantic relationships. In: 19th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), pp. 33–43. IEEE Computer Society Press (2017)
Sun, Y., Xu, W., Su, J.: Declarative choreographies for artifacts. In: Liu, C., Ludwig, H., Toumani, F., Yu, Q. (eds.) ICSOC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7636, pp. 420–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34321-6_28
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Barthelmess, P., Ellis, C.A., Wainer, J.: Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 10(04), 443–481 (2001)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the ZAFH Intralogistik, funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg, Germany (F.No. 32-7545.24-17/3/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Steinau, S., Andrews, K., Reichert, M. (2018). Modeling Process Interactions with Coordination Processes. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Proper, H., Ardagna, C., Roman, D., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences. OTM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11229. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02610-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02610-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02609-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02610-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)