Skip to main content

The Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sexually Transmitted Infections
  • 871 Accesses

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of STDs caused by bacteria and protozoa has been in place since the identification of the specific pathogens. Initially, the culture based techniques and the microscopic examination of genital secretions were considered the reference methods and in selected cases these methods are still relevant to achieve the laboratory diagnosis. In the last decades the major improvements in the diagnostic workflows were made based on the use of recombinant antigens for the serology of syphilis and the implementation of nucleic acids amplification techniques for most of these infections. The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and genital mycoplasma is discussed, with a focus on the most innovative approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edmondson DG, Hu B, Norris SJ. Long-term in vitro culture of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. mBio. 2018;9:e01153–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janier M, Hegyi V, Dupin N, Unemo M, Tiplica GS, Potočnik M, French P, Patel R. 2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;12:1581–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chi KH, Danavall D, Taleo F, Pillay A, Ye T, Nachamkin E, Kool JL, Fegan D, Asiedu K, Vestergaard LS, Ballard RC, Chen CY. Molecular differentiation of Treponema pallidum subspecies in skin ulceration clinically suspected as yaws in Vanuatu using real-time multiplex PCR and serological methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:134–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Creegan L, Bauer HM, Samuel MC, Klausner J, Liska S, Bolan G. An evaluation of the relative sensitivities of the venereal disease research laboratory test and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test among patients diagnosed with primary syphilis. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:1016–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peeling RW, Holmes KK, Mabey D, Ronald A. Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(Suppl 5):v1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ptttastuszczak M, Gozdzialska A, Jakiela B, Obtulowicz A, Jaskiewicz J, Wojas-Pelc A. Robust pro-inflammatory immune response is associated with serological cure in patients with syphilis: an observational study. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsen SA, Johnson RE. A manual of tests for syphilis: diagnostics test. 9th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998. http://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/manual-1998/chapt 1.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sambri V, Marangoni A, Eyer C, Reichhuber C, Soutschek E, Negosanti M, D'Antuono A, Cevenini R. Western immunoblotting with five Treponema pallidum recombinant antigens for serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:534–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Enders M, Hunjet A, Gleich M, Imdahl R, Mühlbacher A, Schennach H, Chaiwong K, Sakuldamrongpanich T, Turhan A, Sertöz R, Wolf E, Mayer W, Tao C, Wang LL, Semprini S, Sambri V. Performance evaluation of the Elecsys syphilis assay for the detection of total antibodies to Treponema pallidum. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015;22:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peeling RW, Mabey D, Kamb ML, Chen XS, Radolf JD, Benzaken AS. Syphilis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cevenini R, Donati M, Sambri V. Chlamydia trachomatis - the agent. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol1. 2002;16:761–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papp JR, Schachter J, Gaydos CA, Van der Pol B. Recommendations for the laboratory detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae – 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63:1–19.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanjouw E, Ouburg S, de Vries HJ, Stary A, Radcliffe K, Unemo M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27:333–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook RL, Hutchison SL, Østergaard L, Braithwaite RS, Ness RB. Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:914–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schachter J, Chow JM, Howard H, Bolan G, Moncada J. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2512–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoner BP, Cohen SE. Lymphogranuloma venereum 2015: clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(Suppl 8):s865–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer T. Diagnostic procedures to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Microorganisms. 2016;4:25–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly H, Coltart CEM, Pant Pai N, Klausner JD, Unemo M, Toskin I, Peeling RW. Systematic reviews of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(S4):S22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Unemo M, Bradshaw CS, Hocking JS, de Vries HJC, Francis SC, Mabey D, Marrazzo JM, Sonder GJB, Schwebke JR, Hoornenborg E, Peeling RW, Philip SS, Low N, Fairley CK. Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:e235–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Unemo M. Challenges with antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the era of extensively drug-resistant gonorrhoea – molecular antimicrobial resistance testing crucial. Pathog Glob Health. 2014;108:214–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Low N, Unemo M. Molecular tests for the detection of antimicrobial resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae: when, where, and how to use? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guy RJ, Causer LM, Klausner JD, Unemo M, Toskin I, Azzini AM, Peeling RW. Performance and operational characteristics of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of urogenital gonococcal infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(S4):S16–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira AS, Ferrão AR, Pereira FM, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, Palmeira-de-Oliveira A. Trichomonas vaginalis: an updated overview towards diagnostic improvement. Acta Parasitol. 2016;61:10–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bouchemal K, Bories C, Loiseau PM. Strategies for prevention and treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:811–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fox J, Fidler S. Sexual transmission of HIV-1. Antivir Res. 2010;85:276–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Muzny CA, Blackburn RJ, Sinsky RJ, Austin EL, Schwebke JR. Added benefit of nucleic acid amplification testing for the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis among men and women attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:834–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Capoccia R, Greub G, Baud D. Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013;26:231–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tully JG, Taylor-Robinson D, Cole RM, Rose DL. A newly discovered mycoplasma in the human urogenital tract. Lancet. 1981;1:1288–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaydos CA. Mycoplasma genitalium: accurate diagnosis is necessary for adequate treatment. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl 2):S406–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Munson E. Molecular diagnostics update for the emerging (if not already widespread) sexually transmitted infection agent Mycoplasma genitalium: just about ready for prime time. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2894–902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: yet another challenging STI. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:795–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis DA, Mitjà O. Haemophilus ducrey: from sexually transmitted infection to skin ulcer pathogen. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:52–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis DA. Epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of Haemophilus ducrey – a disappearing pathogen? Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2014;12:687–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mackay IM, Harnett G, Jeoffreys N, Bastian I, Sriprakash KS, Siebert D, Sloots TP. Detection and discrimination of herpes simplex virus, Haemophilus ducrey, Treponema pallidum and Calymmatobacterium (Klebsiella) granulomatis from genital ulcers. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1431–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. O'Farrell N, Moi H. 2016 European guideline on donovanosis. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27:605–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Farrell N. Donovanosis. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78:452–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Carter JS, Kemp DJ. A colorimetric detection system for Calymmatobacterium granulomatis. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76:134–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dirani G, Zannoli S, Pedna MF, Congestrì F, Farabegoli P, Dalmo B, Sambri V. Bacterial vaginosis: epidemiologic clinical and diagnostic updates. Microbiol Med. 2017;32:7347.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:223–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983;74:14–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;29:297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Coleman JS, Gaydos CA. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: an update. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00342–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Paavonen J, Brunham RC. Bacterial vaginosis and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. NEJM. 2018;379:2246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vittorio Sambri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sambri, V. (2020). The Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases. In: Cristaudo, A., Giuliani, M. (eds) Sexually Transmitted Infections . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02200-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02200-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02199-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02200-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics