Skip to main content

The Strategic and Economic Implications of Consumer-to-Consumer Product Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sharing Economy

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 6))

Abstract

In recent years, mobile communications technologies and online sharing platforms have made collaborative consumption among consumers a major trend in the economy. Consumers buy many products but end up not fully utilizing them. A product owners self-use values can differ over time, and in a period of low self-use value, the owner may rent out her product in a product-sharing market. This paper develops an analytical framework to examine the strategic and economic impact of product sharing among consumers. Our analysis shows that transaction costs in the sharing market have a non-monotonic effect on the firm’s profits, consumer surplus, and social welfare. We find that when the firm strategically chooses its retail price, consumers sharing of products with high marginal costs is win-win for the firm and the consumers whereas their sharing of products with low marginal costs can be lose-lose. Further, in the presence of the sharing market, the firm will find it optimal to strategically increase its quality, leading to higher profits but lower consumer surplus. In addition, within a distribution channel framework, the existence of the sharing market is more likely to increase the downstream retailers profit than the upstream manufacturers profit, i.e., product sharing can sometimes benefit the downstream retailer at the expense of the upstream manufacturer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Though we use consumer-to-consumer sharing as the context, our model applies equally to business-to-business sharing of products, e.g., the sharing of equipment among businesses or hospitals. The essence is that a firm/manufacturer’s customers may rent out the product to its other potential customers during periods of low self-use value.

  2. 2.

    For expositional convenience, we refer to the firm/manufacturer as “it” and a consumer as “she.”

  3. 3.

    The firm is assumed to play no direct role in the product-sharing market. In reality, in many markets, the firms (manufacturers) themselves do not offer hour-to-hour or day-to-day rentals of their products. This may be because the firm’s transaction cost for managing renting of its products is much higher than that for consumers. For example, a consumer with an Xbox console can rent it to others in her local area on a daily or weekly basis much more efficiently than Microsoft, the producer of the Xbox, since the company would have many logistical issues (e.g., due to the lack of physical presence in the consumer’s local area or city). Indeed, in reality, on these product-sharing platforms (or the firms’ stores), we typically do not see the firms themselves offering to rent their products on a day-to-day basis; for example, we do not see General Motors offering hourly rental of their cars on car-sharing websites or at its own dealerships.

  4. 4.

    https://techcrunch.com/2016/04/08/bmw-just-jumped-into-the-u-s-car-sharing-biz-with-the-help-of-yc-alum-ridecell/

References

  • Agrawal VV, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas VM (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Manag Sci 58(3):523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, So KC, Tang CS, Chen X, Wang H (2016) Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform: price, wage, and payout ratio. Working paper, University of California, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2010) Sharing. J Consum Res 36:715–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R (2014) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res 67:1595–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellos L, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2017) The car sharing economy: interaction of business model choice and product line design. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 19(2):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C (2018, Forthcoming) Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Manag Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Esteban S, Shum M (2013) Why do secondary markets harm firms. Am Econ Rev 103(7):2911–2934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai P (1999) Competition in durable goods markets: the strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Market Sci 18(1):42–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Manag Sci 44(11):19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraiberger S, Sundararajan A (2015) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. Working paper, New York University

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • General Motors (2012) RelayRides and OnStar: baby, you can rent my car. GM news. http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2012/Jul/0717_onstar.html

    Google Scholar 

  • He L, Mak HY, Rong Y, Shen ZJM (2017) Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 19(2):309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendel I, Lizzeri A (1999) Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J Econ 30(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B, Tian L (2018) Collaborative consumption: strategic and economic implications of product sharing. Manag Sci 64(3):1171–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JP (2011) Secondary markets with changing preferences. RAND J Econ 42(3):555–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J Econ Theory 18:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PWC (2015) The sharing economy: consumer intelligence series. PWC research report. http://www.pwc.com/us/en/technology/publications/sharing-economy.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Jiang B (2018) Effects of consumer-to-consumer product sharing on distribution channel. Prod Oper Manag 27(2):350–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber TA (2014) Intermediation in a sharing economy: insurance, moral hazard, and rent extraction. J Manag Inf Syst 31(3):35–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber TA (2016) Product pricing in a peer-to-peer economy. J Manag Inf Syst 33(2):573–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW (2017) The rise of the sharing economy: estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. J Market Res 54(5):687–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is extensively based on the authors’ paper in Management Science (Jiang and Tian 2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baojun Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiang, B., Tian, L. (2019). The Strategic and Economic Implications of Consumer-to-Consumer Product Sharing. In: Hu, M. (eds) Sharing Economy. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01863-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics