Skip to main content

Measurement of Upper Limb Function During Daily Life After Stroke

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III (ICNR 2018)

Part of the book series: Biosystems & Biorobotics ((BIOSYSROB,volume 21))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

Patient progress in rehabilitation after stroke is measured with standard clinical assessments. In questionnaires or test settings a therapist encourages the patient to perform a set of tasks. These tasks typically do not match what the patient does in daily life. To measure the upper limb function in daily life movements, a sensor-based system has been developed. The study investigates, with a full body sensor-based system the difference between standard clinical assessments and daily life monitoring. Four stroke patients were included in the analyses. A change in arm use during rehabilitation and the difference between clinical assessments and daily life measures were observed rendering the latter as potentially more sensitive candidates for outcome measures.

This study was part of the INTERACTION project, which was funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (FP7-ICT-2011-7-287351) and the P&K Pühringer Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jørgensen, H.S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H.O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M., Olsen, T.S.: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76(5), 406–412 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, E., Murray, L., Richards, L., Zorowitz, R., Bakas, T., Clark, P., et al.: Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 41(10), 2402–2448 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schweighofer, N., Han, C.E., Wolf, S.L., Arbib, M.A., Winstein, C.J.: A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial. Phys. Ther. 89(12), 1327–1336 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, R.R., Klaesner, J.W., Lang, C.E.: Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29(10), 969–978 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, Y.F., Goldstein, D.B., Angrist, M., Cavalleri, G.: Personalized medicine and human genetic diversity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4(9), a008581 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klaassen, B., van Beijnum, B.J., Weusthof, M., Hofs, D., van Meulen, F., Droog, E., et al.: A full body sensing system for monitoring stroke patients in a home environment. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 511, 378–393 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Meulen, F.B., Klaassen, B., Held, J., Reenalda, J., Buurke, J.H., van Beijnum, B.-J.F., et al.: Objective evaluation of the quality of movement in daily life after stroke. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3, 210 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Held, J.P.O., Klaassen, B., Eenhoorn, A., van Beijnum, B.-J.F., Buurke, J.H., Veltink, P.H., Luft, A.R.: Inertial sensor measurements of upper-limb kinematics in stroke patients in clinic and home environment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6(27) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roetenberg, D., Luinge, H.J., Baten, C.T., Veltink, P.H.: Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13(3), 395–405 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goudriaan, M., Jonkers, I., van Dieen, J.H., Bruijn, S.M.: Arm swing in human walking: what is their drive? Gait Posture 40, 321–326 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart, J.C., Cramer, S.C.: Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke 44, 1111–1116 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfe, C.D., Crichton, S.L., Heuschmann, P.U., McKevitt, C.J., Toschke, A.M., Grieve, A.P., Rudd, A.G.: Estimates of outcomes up to ten years after stroke: analysis from the prospective South London Stroke Register. PLoS Med. 8(5), e1001033 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. https://clinicaltrials.govNCT03522519

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremia P. O. Held .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Held, J.P.O., Veltink, P.H., van Meulen, F.B., Luft, A.R., Buurke, J.H. (2019). Measurement of Upper Limb Function During Daily Life After Stroke. In: Masia, L., Micera, S., Akay, M., Pons, J. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III. ICNR 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01844-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01845-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics