Skip to main content

Using Technologies to Teach Different Age Groups Meaningfully

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Didactics of Smart Pedagogy
  • 1685 Accesses

Abstract

Increasing use of technologies in schools is inevitable as technologies provide new opportunities for innovative ways of learning and naturally attract students’ attention as modern and even playful tools. However, use of technologies can be most effective if the tasks are suitable for the specific age of students. It is necessary for teachers to be aware of cognitive development of children in different age groups in order to offer teaching methods and tasks that can be well-perceived by students and that foster the development of their cognitive abilities. This chapter provides a brief overview of cognitive development of children at different school ages, including development of executive functions and cognitive abilities, and gives examples of how information technology tools can be effectively used for different age groups. There should be at least two advantages for appropriate use of technologies: (1) age-appropriate technology use should enhance learning experiences so that students gain deeper knowledge, comprehension, and competencies in school subjects; and (2) appropriate tools help to maintain students’ attention and motivation, as well as foster their cognitive development, not impede it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, T., & Tatnall, A. (2008). Using ICT to improve the education of students with learning disabilities. In M. Kendall & B. Samways (Eds.), Learning to live in the knowledge society (pp. 63–70). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 468–492). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydges, C. R., Reid, C. L., Fox, A. M., & Anderson, M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence, 40, 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J, Giedd, J. N., & Thomas, K. M. (2000). Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology, 54(1–3), 241–257. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00058-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J., Tottenham, N., Liston, C., & Durston, S. (2005). Imaging the developing brain: What have we learned about cognitive development? Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 104–110. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniela, L., & Lytras, M. (2018). SMART pedagogy: (Re)defining pedagogy. In L. Daniela & M. Lytras (Eds.), Learning strategies and constructionism in modern education settings (pp. 1–15). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5430-1.ch001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David, M., Varga-Estefan, M., Hatvani, A., Taskó, T. A., Dorner, L., & Soltész, P. (2015). The impact of ICTs use on cognitive skills. Proceedings of ECER 2015 “Education and Transition. Contributions from Educational Research”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., & Cakane, L. (2015). The use of ICT in the science lessons: Experience from Latvia. Proceedings of the International Conference BalticSTE 2015. Šiauliai, Lithuania. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/13101334/STATE-OF-THE-ART_AND_FUTURE_PERSPECTIVES

  • Friedman, N. P., Haberstick, B. C., Willcutt, E. G., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., et al. (2007). Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence. Psychological Science, 18(10), 893–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhs, M. W., Nesbitt, K. T., Farran, D. C., & Dong, N. (2014). Longitudinal associations between executive functioning and academic skills across content areas. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1698–1709. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. A., Princiotta, D., & Otero, T. M. (2014). Introduction: A history of executive functioning as a theoretical and clinical construct. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of executive functioning (pp. 3–12). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hacatrjana, L. (2017). Relation of complex problem solving skills, cognitive abilities and executive functions in 16–19 year old students. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Latvia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, J. (2016). Digital skills and the influence of students’ socio-economic background. An exploratory study in German elementary schools. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(2), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved from: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/The_Impact_of_Digital_Technologies_on_Learning_(2012).pdf

  • Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. L. (2016). Possible effects of internet use on cognitive development in adolescence. Media and Communication, 4(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i3.516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, G. (2011). Primary teachers and ICT: Is gender, age or experience important? Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(7), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Position statement). Reston, VA. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/

  • Nelson, K. (2002). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). Educational apps from the Android Google Play for Greek preschoolers: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 116, 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paus, T. (2005). Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L. (2015). Researching young children’s everyday uses of technology in the family home. Interacting with Computers, 27(1), 36–46. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpina, F., & Tagini, S. (2017). The stroop color and word test. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 557. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557

  • Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Lockl, K., & Fernandez, O. (2013). In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.)., Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability and theory of mind Interrelationships among theory of mind, executive control, language development, and working memory in young children: A longitudinal analysis. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., & Sodian, B. (Eds.). (2013). Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability and theory of mind. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 745–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500162854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 69–74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 562–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towse, J., & Cowan, N. (2013). Working memory and its relevance for cognitive development). In W. Schneider, R. Schumann-Hengsteler, & B. Sodian (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability and theory of mind. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tun, P. A., & Lachman, M. E. (2010). The association between computer use and cognition across adulthood: Use it so you won’t lose it? Psychological Aging, 25(3), 560–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umar, I. N., & Jalil, N. A. (2012). ICT skills, practices and barriers of its use among secondary school students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5672–5676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaranis, N. (2016). Does the use of Information and Communication Technology through the use of Realistic Mathematics Education help kindergarten students to enhance their effectiveness in addition and subtraction? Preschool & Primary Education, 5(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.9058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hačatrjana, L. (2019). Using Technologies to Teach Different Age Groups Meaningfully. In: Daniela, L. (eds) Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01550-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01551-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics